It's not fun or worth the money, to pay the same amount for those bubble players to play on a B team that mostly made up of unskilled kids who should probably be playing rec. It's hard to get better on these teams, no matter how hard you work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child is young and joined the pool for the Spring season, but we were told initially she'd start out on the second team. She's been with the first team all season, though, and despite not as much field time as her first team peers she is happy to be playing with that group int he matches. We know the player pool is expanding substantially for the next year cycle. We didn't ask about team placement for next year, because from our perspective it would be impossible for the coaches to know that now as much can change over summer and until they can have the entire group together to train in pre-season to see where it makes sense to sort things out. To me, it doesn't matter until they reach 11v11 and positions become really specialized. Then you have a good sense as to whether or not your DC is a top player in their position or not. At the younger ages, I don't think parents should concern themselves with it too much unless they are seeing their DC is not getting much playing time at all on whatever team they are grouped with.
It's very club dependent. If the club fields 4 teams at an age group, moving through them is probably fine and the kid is best off playing more. If the club fields two and one is playing high level and the other low, then a kid probably won't improve much playing and practicing with the B team (especially compared to a similarly skilled player playing and practicing with the A team)
Facing this issue. It's a bad position to be in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child is young and joined the pool for the Spring season, but we were told initially she'd start out on the second team. She's been with the first team all season, though, and despite not as much field time as her first team peers she is happy to be playing with that group int he matches. We know the player pool is expanding substantially for the next year cycle. We didn't ask about team placement for next year, because from our perspective it would be impossible for the coaches to know that now as much can change over summer and until they can have the entire group together to train in pre-season to see where it makes sense to sort things out. To me, it doesn't matter until they reach 11v11 and positions become really specialized. Then you have a good sense as to whether or not your DC is a top player in their position or not. At the younger ages, I don't think parents should concern themselves with it too much unless they are seeing their DC is not getting much playing time at all on whatever team they are grouped with.
It's very club dependent. If the club fields 4 teams at an age group, moving through them is probably fine and the kid is best off playing more. If the club fields two and one is playing high level and the other low, then a kid probably won't improve much playing and practicing with the B team (especially compared to a similarly skilled player playing and practicing with the A team)
I also think that moving a kid off the A team to make it competitive is fine, but your kid is the consumer and is free to shop elsewhere if they don't like the product being offered.
And unfortunately there are younger teams where position s seem fully set by U11. Personally I think that is doing a disservice to the kids; bodies and skills change over time and they should know how to play each position before their teen years. But what do I know, I’m just a parent...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child is young and joined the pool for the Spring season, but we were told initially she'd start out on the second team. She's been with the first team all season, though, and despite not as much field time as her first team peers she is happy to be playing with that group int he matches. We know the player pool is expanding substantially for the next year cycle. We didn't ask about team placement for next year, because from our perspective it would be impossible for the coaches to know that now as much can change over summer and until they can have the entire group together to train in pre-season to see where it makes sense to sort things out. To me, it doesn't matter until they reach 11v11 and positions become really specialized. Then you have a good sense as to whether or not your DC is a top player in their position or not. At the younger ages, I don't think parents should concern themselves with it too much unless they are seeing their DC is not getting much playing time at all on whatever team they are grouped with.
It's very club dependent. If the club fields 4 teams at an age group, moving through them is probably fine and the kid is best off playing more. If the club fields two and one is playing high level and the other low, then a kid probably won't improve much playing and practicing with the B team (especially compared to a similarly skilled player playing and practicing with the A team)
Anonymous wrote:Our child is young and joined the pool for the Spring season, but we were told initially she'd start out on the second team. She's been with the first team all season, though, and despite not as much field time as her first team peers she is happy to be playing with that group int he matches. We know the player pool is expanding substantially for the next year cycle. We didn't ask about team placement for next year, because from our perspective it would be impossible for the coaches to know that now as much can change over summer and until they can have the entire group together to train in pre-season to see where it makes sense to sort things out. To me, it doesn't matter until they reach 11v11 and positions become really specialized. Then you have a good sense as to whether or not your DC is a top player in their position or not. At the younger ages, I don't think parents should concern themselves with it too much unless they are seeing their DC is not getting much playing time at all on whatever team they are grouped with.
Anonymous wrote:What are you doing PP? Are you assuming you'll just accept whatever offer they give or are you looking around?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our club has only guaranteed existing players a spot but will not commit at all to which team, nor to a timeline for that commitment. We are leaving, it is not worth the drama at this age.
What club? That's anxiety provoking.
Anonymous wrote:Be proud of your kid. He’s no fool and not falling for their BS...smart kid. I hope he ends up in a great situation elsewhere!
Agreed.
I think it depends. If the reason they are moving him down is to get more $, by all means, getting out of there is 100 percent the right choice. If the reason that they are moving him down is that they think the other players are better, then the club is doing what it is supposed to. Much as I would like to think that clubs are working to develop kids, and I hope that they are, at the end of the day, another consideration that they have is to put together the most competitive teams that they can. I get that it stings - my son was not offered a spot on his club's futsal team, even though he did a good job for them in multiple previous years, because there were players outside the club that they felt were stronger.
Anonymous wrote:Our club has only guaranteed existing players a spot but will not commit at all to which team, nor to a timeline for that commitment. We are leaving, it is not worth the drama at this age.