Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kids don't get bored in the suburbs. But they do get into trouble of the sort that most parents will never know about. And parents who think "not MY kids" are in denial. Most end up fine in the end, though -- like kids everywhere.
I got bored as hell in the suburbs and that is why I did drugs. It was boring before the drugs and boring after the high came down.
Anonymous wrote:there is a lot between nyc and cow tipping
Anonymous wrote:I moved from NYC to LA (which is basically the suburbs) in high school and I was bored. Having to coordinate rides to get places was so tedious and annoying, and I had no interest in "playing" in the backyard which was beautiful. I was not involved in sports and even the stuff I was involved in required a lot of carpooling and coordinating rides. The idea that I constantly had to ask for rides and get adults involved seemed totally ridiculous to me. I felt like I spent so much time waiting around for someone to drive me somewhere.
Had I lived in like, Idaho or someplace REALLY suburban I'd probably have run away. I was the type of kid going to a museum or event every week. If all there was to do was going to various friends houses or tip cows, I'd have been totally miserable.
And one of the best things about growing up there was that it was completely normal to go into the city for dinner and a Broadway show or to the see the ballet after school. Highly recommend the area! Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A suburb that has things you can walk/bike to or has decent public transit is very different than a really sprawling suburb that is highly car dependent.
Kids who want to find trouble will find it in any setting.
I grew up in suburban NY and then suburban Philly, right by trains to both, and we almost never bothered to go in except for a few concerts once people had their licenses. There was enough stuff to do at home.
You lived by a train in suburban NY but had to wait to get drivers’ licenses to go to concerts?