Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Do public schools have freshman teams?
Deepnds on the sport - but yes - plenty do. Not all though.
NP here. Large high schools should be fielding an A team and a B team starting freshman year, all the way through high school. The A track would end in Varsity, the B track would not. Coaching staff and field space would be two obstacles, but I wish school systems would overcome them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Do public schools have freshman teams?
Deepnds on the sport - but yes - plenty do. Not all though.
It would be wonderful if all private schools would embrace this model. No cuts can go beyond JV and freshman teams if there are enough players.Anonymous wrote:My kids go to a school with no cuts for any sports and a sports requirement. The number of kids who try new things is inspiring. For the first time in a long time, after we switched to this kind of school, I see kids playing for fun again, even the really athletic kids. They get all the benefit of exercising and working hard to improve, being a part of team, having leadership opportunities, learning the thrill of victory and agony of defeat, with none of the other modern nonsense we are seeing in youth athletics.
The competitiveness of some leagues and schools (and we've been there too) is a disaster for development, and it is all related to college admissions, for profit youth sports, tracking kids to levels and labeling them according to ability, and measuring their worth based on these levels. It is all marketing. It is the same tactic used by the most addictive video games. Parent and their kids have become addicted to leveling up in pay to play sports.
+1,000Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
Do public schools have freshman teams?
Anonymous wrote:Why does PE have to be the only outlet for physical fitness for these kids? Go for a 30 minute walk with your kid. Is that not an option?
BTW, my primary school PE teacher in the 70s & 80s was not any more fit than what you describe. The “fit” PE teacher in secondary school was a roid monster all about gains in the weight room.
Anonymous wrote:NP.
Here is a link to the article OP quoted.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-04-10/youth-sports-mental-health-pandemic
I agree with many of the author's points. At risk awakening the forum bully, the instability of youth sports, and particularly soccer, is detrimental to the lessons you want to teach kids - taking risks, managing stress, and persisting through setbacks. Putting kids on a never-ending chopping block beginning at 8 is setting kids up for mental health issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids go to a school with no cuts for any sports and a sports requirement. The number of kids who try new things is inspiring. For the first time in a long time, after we switched to this kind of school, I see kids playing for fun again, even the really athletic kids. They get all the benefit of exercising and working hard to improve, being a part of team, having leadership opportunities, learning the thrill of victory and agony of defeat, with none of the other modern nonsense we are seeing in youth athletics.
The competitiveness of some leagues and schools (and we've been there too) is a disaster for development, and it is all related to college admissions, for profit youth sports, tracking kids to levels and labeling them according to ability, and measuring their worth based on these levels. It is all marketing. It is the same tactic used by the most addictive video games. Parent and their kids have become addicted to leveling up in pay to play sports.
Do you mind sharing what school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think MS & HS sports should be open to more kids. I think more kids wouldn’t drop out at age 13 if that was the case.
It wouldn't be hard for schools to fields multiple teams in most sports. Of course then the kids wouldn't represent the school per se, but if we think athletics are really an important part of what happens in high school, then why not field three volleyball teams if enough kids want to play?
You mean like Varsity, JV and freshmen teams?
if you still turn away the majority of kids who come out for tryouts there aren't enough spots
Blame the BIG 100-220 county school districts like MoCo, Fairfax and even DC. 9th grade can be 400-800 students at some of their high schools, times four grades. Same team sizes.
I wish it was a township public school - academics, autonomy, sports, community- would all better serve the actual students. The county model is just corrupt and mismanaged. ESP in barbell large counties (huge % of above avg performers and huge % of below).
Anonymous wrote:My kids go to a school with no cuts for any sports and a sports requirement. The number of kids who try new things is inspiring. For the first time in a long time, after we switched to this kind of school, I see kids playing for fun again, even the really athletic kids. They get all the benefit of exercising and working hard to improve, being a part of team, having leadership opportunities, learning the thrill of victory and agony of defeat, with none of the other modern nonsense we are seeing in youth athletics.
The competitiveness of some leagues and schools (and we've been there too) is a disaster for development, and it is all related to college admissions, for profit youth sports, tracking kids to levels and labeling them according to ability, and measuring their worth based on these levels. It is all marketing. It is the same tactic used by the most addictive video games. Parent and their kids have become addicted to leveling up in pay to play sports.