Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

here is Gayles making fun of Reimer https://mobile.twitter.com/SmPotatoes/status/1386510384601907201

OK, I dislike Riemer more than almost any other politician out there, but Gayles doesn't own the guidance and information he tells people. He's the public health officer after all. He's supposed to give us guidance. And Riemer is just educating his constituents with that note.

The guy is so egotistical that he thinks Riemer should cite him when repeating his guidance. But in any case, I'm not going to defend Gayles but I can see a situation if you work in the vicinity of Riemer for long enough that you would just interpret all of his behavior as craven. Because well...

hahah, true.

Ok what’s the backstory with Riemer? He doesn’t seem well liked but don’t know the particulars....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

here is Gayles making fun of Reimer https://mobile.twitter.com/SmPotatoes/status/1386510384601907201

OK, I dislike Riemer more than almost any other politician out there, but Gayles doesn't own the guidance and information he tells people. He's the public health officer after all. He's supposed to give us guidance. And Riemer is just educating his constituents with that note.

The guy is so egotistical that he thinks Riemer should cite him when repeating his guidance. But in any case, I'm not going to defend Gayles but I can see a situation if you work in the vicinity of Riemer for long enough that you would just interpret all of his behavior as craven. Because well...

hahah, true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

here is Gayles making fun of Reimer https://mobile.twitter.com/SmPotatoes/status/1386510384601907201

OK, I dislike Riemer more than almost any other politician out there, but Gayles doesn't own the guidance and information he tells people. He's the public health officer after all. He's supposed to give us guidance. And Riemer is just educating his constituents with that note.

The guy is so egotistical that he thinks Riemer should cite him when repeating his guidance. But in any case, I'm not going to defend Gayles but I can see a situation if you work in the vicinity of Riemer for long enough that you would just interpret all of his behavior as craven. Because well...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

here is Gayles making fun of Reimer https://mobile.twitter.com/SmPotatoes/status/1386510384601907201

OK, I dislike Riemer more than almost any other politician out there, but Gayles doesn't own the guidance and information he tells people. He's the public health officer after all. He's supposed to give us guidance. And Riemer is just educating his constituents with that note.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

here is Gayles making fun of Reimer https://mobile.twitter.com/SmPotatoes/status/1386510384601907201

Anonymous wrote:Is this legit? Isn’t that publication like the Fox of newspapers?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing will happen to him but he should be fired. Shows so much bias and discontent for people advocating for their child's education and social well-being. Even if Gayles personally disagreed, that's just repulsive.

This would be an opportunity for Elrich or the Council to actually show some guts and put out some forceful words, but they won't do that either. I can't imagine Elrich doing so, would be nice to see some of the more reasonable Council members do anything. I can think of one or two that would probably want to but won't for the sake of county politics and it being a perceived risk to say anything at all negative about Gayles.

They all have the same mindset. I am almost certain they see nothing wrong with his comments.

This. And that's a big problem because I tend to agree with Gayles/Elrich/County Council on a lot of things but I can't support this. It tells me he made decisions, and others supported him, out of vindictiveness and not public health considerations. That undermines everything else we need to do to end the pandemic.

I donated to Elrich and voted for him. I personally agreed with the decision to keep both public and private schools closed at the time until county case numbers came down.

However, I really just cannot get with this. The "vindictiveness" that you point out seems to have infected a lot of prevailing attitudes in this county, not just public health but also education and planning. it is very troubling because we are either one community or we are not. It seems that a lot people, particularly people in important positions, do not believe that we are. It frankly worries me for the future of this county.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing will happen to him but he should be fired. Shows so much bias and discontent for people advocating for their child's education and social well-being. Even if Gayles personally disagreed, that's just repulsive.

This would be an opportunity for Elrich or the Council to actually show some guts and put out some forceful words, but they won't do that either. I can't imagine Elrich doing so, would be nice to see some of the more reasonable Council members do anything. I can think of one or two that would probably want to but won't for the sake of county politics and it being a perceived risk to say anything at all negative about Gayles.

They all have the same mindset. I am almost certain they see nothing wrong with his comments.

This. And that's a big problem because I tend to agree with Gayles/Elrich/County Council on a lot of things but I can't support this. It tells me he made decisions, and others supported him, out of vindictiveness and not public health considerations. That undermines everything else we need to do to end the pandemic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

here is Gayles making fun of Reimer https://mobile.twitter.com/SmPotatoes/status/1386510384601907201

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the stuff on Riemer? I can’t find it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting the hypocrisy that he hasn’t been cancelled yet. And we all know why.

I'm willing to bet it's because few people know about it and county officials want to keep it that way. People need to write their councilmemebers- it will be harder for them to ignore if they hear from constituents about it. And other news organizations need to pick up the story.