Anonymous wrote:Reminder: this thread is supposed to be about how people feel about no distancing in the fall. Stop telling everyone who is uncomfortable with no distance to choose virtual. They all know that is an option. Sheesh.
Personally, I am very curious if and how no distancing changes the risk calculation for parents who were planning to send kids to school this fall. Obviously there are some who will send their kids no matter what precautions are eliminated, and some who will choose virtual no mater the precautions taken. Its those in the middle that I'd like to hear from (I'm NOT OP).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reminder: this thread is supposed to be about how people feel about no distancing in the fall. Stop telling everyone who is uncomfortable with no distance to choose virtual. They all know that is an option. Sheesh.
Personally, I am very curious if and how no distancing changes the risk calculation for parents who were planning to send kids to school this fall. Obviously there are some who will send their kids no matter what precautions are eliminated, and some who will choose virtual no mater the precautions taken. Its those in the middle that I'd like to hear from (I'm NOT OP).
There is no discussion here about that because those posters get jumped on to pick virtual. We are sending our kids back but are not 100% thrilled with the safety protocols (particularly as it pertains to lunch). If I had an unvaccinated middle school student I would be pushing for more safety protocols (not distancing) like air quality, use of outdoors and testing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reminder: this thread is supposed to be about how people feel about no distancing in the fall. Stop telling everyone who is uncomfortable with no distance to choose virtual. They all know that is an option. Sheesh.
Personally, I am very curious if and how no distancing changes the risk calculation for parents who were planning to send kids to school this fall. Obviously there are some who will send their kids no matter what precautions are eliminated, and some who will choose virtual no mater the precautions taken. Its those in the middle that I'd like to hear from (I'm NOT OP).
There is no discussion here about that because those posters get jumped on to pick virtual. We are sending our kids back but are not 100% thrilled with the safety protocols (particularly as it pertains to lunch). If I had an unvaccinated middle school student I would be pushing for more safety protocols (not distancing) like air quality, use of outdoors and testing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am totally fine with it and wish they would just do it now. DL days are utterly worthless for my second and kinder kid and most every parent I talk to feel the same. I do no understand why the school board isn't pushing for more days - how in the world can Fairfax pull this off but we can't. Between no school last spring, the dragging of feet to get kids in school this year, and what I'm sure will be insane quarantine procedures next year, we are looking for homes in McLean. i just can't gamble my kids education with APS anymore. My friends around the coutnry have all been back since October with minimal disruption. Yes, it's different but their kids are learning mine are not.
Right on point. We also have a HS...disadvantages applying for college and competing with kids from districts that didn’t close, continued sports and EC activities, learning loss...etc.
Anonymous wrote:I am totally fine with it and wish they would just do it now. DL days are utterly worthless for my second and kinder kid and most every parent I talk to feel the same. I do no understand why the school board isn't pushing for more days - how in the world can Fairfax pull this off but we can't. Between no school last spring, the dragging of feet to get kids in school this year, and what I'm sure will be insane quarantine procedures next year, we are looking for homes in McLean. i just can't gamble my kids education with APS anymore. My friends around the coutnry have all been back since October with minimal disruption. Yes, it's different but their kids are learning mine are not.
Anonymous wrote:Reminder: this thread is supposed to be about how people feel about no distancing in the fall. Stop telling everyone who is uncomfortable with no distance to choose virtual. They all know that is an option. Sheesh.
Personally, I am very curious if and how no distancing changes the risk calculation for parents who were planning to send kids to school this fall. Obviously there are some who will send their kids no matter what precautions are eliminated, and some who will choose virtual no mater the precautions taken. Its those in the middle that I'd like to hear from (I'm NOT OP).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As long as they are masking when they’re not eating, I’m okay with this. Odds are most middle and high schoolers will be able to get the vaccine shortly after school starts, if not earlier, and elementary students are easy to cohort.
My issue that I am not happy accepting is that 6th graders (11 yo) will not be vax. They eat in the cafeteria unmasked on cold or rainy days. DD told me they’ve been playing trivia games (at their seat) with the lunch monitors, but kids are not putting their mass back on after they’re done eating. So they’re shouting out answers to trivia games unmasked for about 15 to 20 minutes.
You can start your kid virtual and then switch to in person after the first semester. There’s no way to get all the kids in the building while following distancing.
The answer is not starting virtual (what are you talking about anyway about starting after first quarter? Huh?). The solution is air quality abd enforcing masking when in close contact (not eating) and TESTING!
Do you people even read the information the school sends out?
If you can’t deal, go virtual. There are on ramps to get back in and yes in elementary it’s after the first quarter.
Why would someone to choose to go back after the first quarter when their child is still 11 (speaking of reading, this specific post/discussion was about children who aren’t yet vaccinated in middle school). Many students have June, July, August, September birthdays so will be 11 until their seventh grade year.
Because there is a good chance they’ll be eligible for vaccination by then. The point is they have a chance to go back at certain points if the situation changes.
Yes we all know that. But thanks. The topic of the thread is asking if you comfortable with going back given lack of distancing. It’s perfectly reasonable for people to say no and why they feel that way without being told pick virtual. This is a discussion.
DP here... what is your goal? If you are uncomfortable you either choose virtual or you decide to ignore your worries and send them anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As long as they are masking when they’re not eating, I’m okay with this. Odds are most middle and high schoolers will be able to get the vaccine shortly after school starts, if not earlier, and elementary students are easy to cohort.
My issue that I am not happy accepting is that 6th graders (11 yo) will not be vax. They eat in the cafeteria unmasked on cold or rainy days. DD told me they’ve been playing trivia games (at their seat) with the lunch monitors, but kids are not putting their mass back on after they’re done eating. So they’re shouting out answers to trivia games unmasked for about 15 to 20 minutes.
You can start your kid virtual and then switch to in person after the first semester. There’s no way to get all the kids in the building while following distancing.
The answer is not starting virtual (what are you talking about anyway about starting after first quarter? Huh?). The solution is air quality abd enforcing masking when in close contact (not eating) and TESTING!
Do you people even read the information the school sends out?
If you can’t deal, go virtual. There are on ramps to get back in and yes in elementary it’s after the first quarter.
Why would someone to choose to go back after the first quarter when their child is still 11 (speaking of reading, this specific post/discussion was about children who aren’t yet vaccinated in middle school). Many students have June, July, August, September birthdays so will be 11 until their seventh grade year.