Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of gingers, you know who is kind of a bummer? Amy Adams. The first pic below is the 2016 Golden Globes, when she was 41. And the second photo is last year (age 45). Maybe it's a temporary issue but she looked amazing in 2016 and just looks so puffy and more middle-aged in the second one. Not bad (she's obviously a beautiful woman) but the difference is really striking. I notice it because I have her coloring and similar bone structure and I'm 41 and like how I look, but when I saw her recently I was like "whaaaaat is happening?" If a rich celebrity can take that middle-aged turn so quick, I don't stand a chance!
![]()
I think she looks great in both photos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who look amazing over 40 also looked amazing when they were younger. It’s not surprising that beautiful people remain beautiful.
Some people grow into looks, some people get a faces of meth situation, but for the most part? Yeah. Attractive people are attractive. There was a recent reddit post wondering how Heather Graham looks so great at 51. Step one? Look like Heather Graham at 21. A person who looks awful at 21 for the most part isn't going to transform into a hottie at 51.
(also I like to think that from everything I've heard and personal experience Heather Graham is one of the nicest people in Hollywood so that helps)
I think people know this. Yes, you have to be gorgeous to start out. However, the point is that being gorgeous at 21 does NOT mean you will be even moderately good looking at 51.
Just look at Britney Spears, who I don’t think is even 40. Brooke Shields is someone who was stunning at 20, but at 50, no one would even take a second look at her if they passed her in a grocery store.
My friend is a good friend of Heather Graham and he says that she legit looks like she’s in her early 30s in person. I mean, at 20, Brooke Shields was far more striking than Heather Graham was at the same age, but Heather Graham has aged much more slowly. I think these threads are trying to tease out the differences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of gingers, you know who is kind of a bummer? Amy Adams. The first pic below is the 2016 Golden Globes, when she was 41. And the second photo is last year (age 45). Maybe it's a temporary issue but she looked amazing in 2016 and just looks so puffy and more middle-aged in the second one. Not bad (she's obviously a beautiful woman) but the difference is really striking. I notice it because I have her coloring and similar bone structure and I'm 41 and like how I look, but when I saw her recently I was like "whaaaaat is happening?" If a rich celebrity can take that middle-aged turn so quick, I don't stand a chance!
![]()
I think she looks great in both photos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of gingers, you know who is kind of a bummer? Amy Adams. The first pic below is the 2016 Golden Globes, when she was 41. And the second photo is last year (age 45). Maybe it's a temporary issue but she looked amazing in 2016 and just looks so puffy and more middle-aged in the second one. Not bad (she's obviously a beautiful woman) but the difference is really striking. I notice it because I have her coloring and similar bone structure and I'm 41 and like how I look, but when I saw her recently I was like "whaaaaat is happening?" If a rich celebrity can take that middle-aged turn so quick, I don't stand a chance!
![]()
I think she looks great in both photos.
+1
She looks more vibrant in photo 1, because her makeup brings out her eyes and her dress works well with her makeup coloring. The following time of the blue dress is a less sunny look yet she still looks good.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP and I feel I might have misdirected this thread. It's not meant to insult anyone for not looking great at 40, or to ask how you can look younger than 40 when you are 40.
I really just meant to have a balm to that "what are mistakes people make at 40" thread wherein women who have dared get older and look older and still look awesome can be shared and celebrated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of gingers, you know who is kind of a bummer? Amy Adams. The first pic below is the 2016 Golden Globes, when she was 41. And the second photo is last year (age 45). Maybe it's a temporary issue but she looked amazing in 2016 and just looks so puffy and more middle-aged in the second one. Not bad (she's obviously a beautiful woman) but the difference is really striking. I notice it because I have her coloring and similar bone structure and I'm 41 and like how I look, but when I saw her recently I was like "whaaaaat is happening?" If a rich celebrity can take that middle-aged turn so quick, I don't stand a chance!
![]()
I think she looks great in both photos.
Anonymous wrote:People who look amazing over 40 also looked amazing when they were younger. It’s not surprising that beautiful people remain beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congrats on winning the genetic lottery, I guess?
I don't get the bitterness. Celebrating older women makes me, an older woman, feel good. I know I'll never look like a celebrity, that's not the point. The point is that it's nice to take inspiration from mature women who look their age while also looking amazing. It's just nice to be reminded that being over 40 (or 50, or 60) doesn't mean it's over for you, looks wise. I don't want or need to look 25. But that doesn't mean I can no longer be sexy or beautiful.
Also, while the women we're talking about on here are genetically gifted, a lot of their beauty comes from their personalities and their talent. Beauty isn't just tight, dewey skin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who look amazing over 40 also looked amazing when they were younger. It’s not surprising that beautiful people remain beautiful.
Some people grow into looks, some people get a faces of meth situation, but for the most part? Yeah. Attractive people are attractive. There was a recent reddit post wondering how Heather Graham looks so great at 51. Step one? Look like Heather Graham at 21. A person who looks awful at 21 for the most part isn't going to transform into a hottie at 51.
(also I like to think that from everything I've heard and personal experience Heather Graham is one of the nicest people in Hollywood so that helps)
Anonymous wrote:People who look amazing over 40 also looked amazing when they were younger. It’s not surprising that beautiful people remain beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s her name... the ginger with really long hair? In her 50s, I think?
Nicole Kidman? She’s so plastic, if you put her next to a radiator, she’d melt.
Julianne Moore? She is gorgeous.