Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 21:06     Subject: Re:McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well written...lots of examples...
I totally understand and agree.


Lol OP literally refused to give an example


I told you it was my feeling, I told you it wasn't 100 objective but contingent on our experience. You can take it or leave it
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 21:00     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.



SYC Boys have no interest in being part of McLean or ECNL crazy travel and fees. What's the benefit for SYC boys there????


I agree. ECNL type structures should not start until U15 or U16. If it's about getting into college then why put 12 year olds in it? I just don't see the benefit. It's the same kids in the same areas playing soccer no matter the team or league.


Ha wait to hear this, ECNL showcase in South Carolina next month for U13 and U14s. With the purpose of? Recruiters are not even attending older ages showcases.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 21:00     Subject: McLeaving
I am McLovin this thread Bubba Bob Bubba
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:58     Subject: McLeaving
We are McLeavin too. Going to SYC!
Oh wait.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:57     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.



SYC Boys have no interest in being part of McLean or ECNL crazy travel and fees. What's the benefit for SYC boys there????


I agree. ECNL type structures should not start until U15 or U16. If it's about getting into college then why put 12 year olds in it? I just don't see the benefit. It's the same kids in the same areas playing soccer no matter the team or league.


So they still haven't explain the benefit to U14 and under????
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:44     Subject: McLeaving
OP here. I made it all up.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:44     Subject: Re:McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:Well written...lots of examples...
I totally understand and agree.


Lol OP literally refused to give an example
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:43     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.


You couldn’t misrepresent this any harder.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:36     Subject: Re:McLeaving
Well written...lots of examples...
I totally understand and agree.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:33     Subject: McLeaving
Do they plan to announce coaching staff during the town hall??
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:26     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.


Agree with this, it is will much better if we can attend tryout after coaching assignment is out.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:25     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.



SYC Boys have no interest in being part of McLean or ECNL crazy travel and fees. What's the benefit for SYC boys there????


I agree. ECNL type structures should not start until U15 or U16. If it's about getting into college then why put 12 year olds in it? I just don't see the benefit. It's the same kids in the same areas playing soccer no matter the team or league.
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:24     Subject: Re:McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We are out too


We know, OP


LOL!
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:13     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.



SYC Boys have no interest in being part of McLean or ECNL crazy travel and fees. What's the benefit for SYC boys there????
Anonymous
Post 04/14/2021 20:04     Subject: McLeaving
Anonymous wrote:I agree with OP. There is a total lack of transparency. I think it is because even they don't know what is going to happen. Last night the 2006 boys had an ID session and NOT A SINGLE SYC player came. Aren't they the #1 team? Supposed to save McLean boys program? Meanwhile a million SYC girls are showing up from first, second, third teams trying to get spots. They need to put out the coaching slate, discuss maximum roster sizes for each age and tell parents when these decisions will be made.


Of course. It was a hasty desperate move by a club trying to stay relevant. That is why MCl wouldn't part with NM when Great Falls stipulated that as a criteria for a merger with them. This is a good move for SYC- they are a club on the rise. For McLean all this means is further alienation of their home grown players and families and their having to fire a bunch more coaches.