Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.
So you think they’ll have your kids come back for IPL only to have ABAR sessions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Yeah to the PP - no schools have every done social engineering before.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?
I would not answer such a garbage-design survey.
Perhaps that’s how they’re weeding folks out.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.
So you think they’ll have your kids come back for IPL only to have ABAR sessions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
DP. Not paranoid at all, given how much people who want IPL have been vilified as racist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?
I would not answer such a garbage-design survey.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Not really. If we were asked this, I also might not be totally honest. It's silly to ask people such a loaded question and expect them to answer honestly when it isn't anonymous. You are skewing the results automatically. It would be different if they question were neutral like, by the way, how do you like the lunch offerings?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:seriously who is going to say ON A NON-ANONYMOUS SURVEY "meh I don't want my kids to have anti-racist education."
Clearly there are some...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?
How paranoid are you?
Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.
Wow. That is paranoid!
Anonymous wrote:seriously who is going to say ON A NON-ANONYMOUS SURVEY "meh I don't want my kids to have anti-racist education."