Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Girl, same. Hitting 40 and my already crappy metabolism tanking has been incredibly demoralizing. Working on improving my attitude—also a slow process
You hit 40 already? Plenty of 50 pluses women on here have no issue being normal or underweight.
I’m the 40+year old you’re insulting.
First—THANK you for those who have stood up for me.
Second—you sound mean and miserable, pp. what compelled you to say this? You don’t know me at all. I have hypothyroidism and my endocrinologist told me I have slow metabolism and he warned me it would likely tank at age 40. Guess what? I exercise and eat really well, barely drink and yet I keep gaining weight on the same food I ate before. Of course I know 50 year olds who are doing fine, good for them— but *I* am having trouble with my metabolism after 40. And you sound like you put other women down to make yourself feel superior. How’s that working for you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you just stopped trying to lose weight? What if you found other goals that were less miserable, like being able to run a certain distance without walking, or holding a plank a certain length of time. Or doing some activity with your kid or your spouse. What if you made sure you were getting the nutrition and quality foods your body needs to accomplish that goal, but then you just stopped worrying about the odd indulgence here and there that you gave just for the pleasure of it.
What if losing weight sucks because it’s not a particularly worthwhile goal?
I love this idea in theory. However, I love to eat. If i could, I would love to nibble all day, I’d have wine with dinner every night.. If I’m not working at it and feeling deprivation, then I’m gaining weight.
Ok, I hear you, but what if you set a physical (non-weight) goal for yourself and then worked towards it just to see what happened? I also loooove to eat. But last year I decided I wanted to be able to run 2 miles without having to stop and walk. It’s a pretty low bar, but I’ve always struggled with endurance. I started with one of those “couch to 5k” plans and keep at it. I made no effort to change my diet.
Well, as I got closer to my goal, I found myself making healthier eating choices overall. I chose less heavy dinner options and drank less at night because I knew that would make me drag in the morning when I ran. I shifted to snacks like nuts and dark chocolate, as opposed to chips, for the same reason.
I didn’t transform my eating habits (I still love dessert, still love wine with dinner, still love food). But I hit my 2 mile goal and now I’m working on being able to do unassisted pull-ups. I eat better. Not perfect, and no calorie restriction. But I FEEL so much better. I sleep better. I like how my body looks more— more toned and just fitter overall. Oh and I drink more water and am more hydrated and even my skin looks better.
I just don’t think deprivation will ever get you anywhere long term. You might hit a short term weight loss goal, but it will come back and you’ll wonder why you bothered, because as OP explains, the process to lose that weight is miserable.
Throw the scale away. Find a better goal.
What constitutes a good goal is subjective.
Personally I find looking good in a tank top and shorts to be motivating
I could care less how long it takes me to run a mile

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Girl, same. Hitting 40 and my already crappy metabolism tanking has been incredibly demoralizing. Working on improving my attitude—also a slow process
You hit 40 already? Plenty of 50 pluses women on here have no issue being normal or underweight.
Anonymous wrote:KETO!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What if you just stopped trying to lose weight? What if you found other goals that were less miserable, like being able to run a certain distance without walking, or holding a plank a certain length of time. Or doing some activity with your kid or your spouse. What if you made sure you were getting the nutrition and quality foods your body needs to accomplish that goal, but then you just stopped worrying about the odd indulgence here and there that you gave just for the pleasure of it.
What if losing weight sucks because it’s not a particularly worthwhile goal?
I love this idea in theory. However, I love to eat. If i could, I would love to nibble all day, I’d have wine with dinner every night.. If I’m not working at it and feeling deprivation, then I’m gaining weight.
Ok, I hear you, but what if you set a physical (non-weight) goal for yourself and then worked towards it just to see what happened? I also loooove to eat. But last year I decided I wanted to be able to run 2 miles without having to stop and walk. It’s a pretty low bar, but I’ve always struggled with endurance. I started with one of those “couch to 5k” plans and keep at it. I made no effort to change my diet.
Well, as I got closer to my goal, I found myself making healthier eating choices overall. I chose less heavy dinner options and drank less at night because I knew that would make me drag in the morning when I ran. I shifted to snacks like nuts and dark chocolate, as opposed to chips, for the same reason.
I didn’t transform my eating habits (I still love dessert, still love wine with dinner, still love food). But I hit my 2 mile goal and now I’m working on being able to do unassisted pull-ups. I eat better. Not perfect, and no calorie restriction. But I FEEL so much better. I sleep better. I like how my body looks more— more toned and just fitter overall. Oh and I drink more water and am more hydrated and even my skin looks better.
I just don’t think deprivation will ever get you anywhere long term. You might hit a short term weight loss goal, but it will come back and you’ll wonder why you bothered, because as OP explains, the process to lose that weight is miserable.
Throw the scale away. Find a better goal.
Anonymous wrote:What if you just stopped trying to lose weight? What if you found other goals that were less miserable, like being able to run a certain distance without walking, or holding a plank a certain length of time. Or doing some activity with your kid or your spouse. What if you made sure you were getting the nutrition and quality foods your body needs to accomplish that goal, but then you just stopped worrying about the odd indulgence here and there that you gave just for the pleasure of it.
What if losing weight sucks because it’s not a particularly worthwhile goal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Girl, same. Hitting 40 and my already crappy metabolism tanking has been incredibly demoralizing. Working on improving my attitude—also a slow process
You hit 40 already? Plenty of 50 pluses women on here have no issue being normal or underweight.
wow that was helpful
Age isn't an excuse for a bad metabolism. Plenty of 20 somethings who are big and stay big even when fit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Girl, same. Hitting 40 and my already crappy metabolism tanking has been incredibly demoralizing. Working on improving my attitude—also a slow process
You hit 40 already? Plenty of 50 pluses women on here have no issue being normal or underweight.
wow that was helpful
Age isn't an excuse for a bad metabolism. Plenty of 20 somethings who are big and stay big even when fit.
That’s not how metabolism works, dipshit.