Anonymous wrote:You guys are going to freak the *#% out, but my DD is in the high-average 89% for math and the 96% for reading on recent MAPS, all As, in the enriched math etc in her regular ES and she was placed in the lottery pool for both. Did not get placed in either. Do you think they took cohort into account this year? Congrats on all your 99% everything kiddos! But sad about not getting a chance for my DD to go to Eastern. I love that program so much. TP would not have been a good fit... but I admit to feeling good she was in the pool. Those of you with 99-ers are probably (justifiably?) angry that she was, I admit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?
I agree but you have to have the top kids there or else it's pointless. At TPMS there's a core group of a dozen kids in each grade who are exceptional. Other kids go there to be with these kids. If they are no longer there then what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?
I agree but you have to have the top kids there or else it's pointless. At TPMS there's a core group of a dozen kids in each grade who are exceptional. Other kids go there to be with these kids. If they are no longer there then what?
They are top kids. I mean they're all in the top 10%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?
I agree but you have to have the top kids there or else it's pointless. At TPMS there's a core group of a dozen kids in each grade who are exceptional. Other kids go there to be with these kids. If they are no longer there then what?
They are top kids. I mean they're all in the top 10%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?
I agree but you have to have the top kids there or else it's pointless. At TPMS there's a core group of a dozen kids in each grade who are exceptional. Other kids go there to be with these kids. If they are no longer there then what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?
I agree but you have to have the top kids there or else it's pointless. At TPMS there's a core group of a dozen kids in each grade who are exceptional. Other kids go there to be with these kids. If they are no longer there then what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fall 2020 MAP: 244 math 240 reading
Report card: straight A's
School: CES Chevy Chase
Lottery pool status: in pool for Eastern and Takoma Park
Magnet status: selected for TPMS but not Eastern
Girl?
There were kids with 270+ MAP last year not selected.
OP here. For reference, my child is a girl, with higher scores, and from the same CES, and did not get in. She's Asian, though. I don't know if MCPS takes gender and race into consideration. I hope not.
It’s a lottery. Once they’re in pool, the actual scores don’t matter.
They might have separate pools for boys and girls if they want to keep some kind of gender balance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fall 2020 MAP: 244 math 240 reading
Report card: straight A's
School: CES Chevy Chase
Lottery pool status: in pool for Eastern and Takoma Park
Magnet status: selected for TPMS but not Eastern
Girl?
There were kids with 270+ MAP last year not selected.
OP here. For reference, my child is a girl, with higher scores, and from the same CES, and did not get in. She's Asian, though. I don't know if MCPS takes gender and race into consideration. I hope not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I saw the letter in our Informed Delivery, but it wasn’t delivered with our mail. Thank you, USPS. Are the notices going to be posted somewhere? Like in ParentVue?
We got our letter today in the mail but it is not in PatrntVue.
Does anyone know how we accept lottery placement? There was no email
Address given in the letter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fall 2020 MAP: 244 math 240 reading
Report card: straight A's
School: CES Chevy Chase
Lottery pool status: in pool for Eastern and Takoma Park
Magnet status: selected for TPMS but not Eastern
Girl?
There were kids with 270+ MAP last year not selected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fall 2020 MAP: 244 math 240 reading
Report card: straight A's
School: CES Chevy Chase
Lottery pool status: in pool for Eastern and Takoma Park
Magnet status: selected for TPMS but not Eastern
Girl?
There were kids with 270+ MAP last year not selected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it seems that some kids with lower scores ‘won’ the lottery and that’s bad luck for the high scoring and also deserving kids. I don’t understand how high scorers were not included in the pool when there are clearly kids with lower (still very good) scores in there.
A much simpler way to doing it would have been to select the top scorers, taking into account previous years of MAP scores to account for the pandemic.
True, although the scores may not be the perfect predictor for success in magnet programs.
Honestly, the magnet middle school program could double or triple their seating and not dilute their excellence. Due to seat shortages, it's more selective than either high school or elementary school magnets.
No selection method is perfect, but I would rather have a strictly academic selection method than any other. This isn't so much for the children who get in since I know they'll do well (see above). It's to allow the outliers and higher-scorers to avoid their home school. A bright kid who is on the cusp might be expected to do well at either school, but for a kid who consistently scores higher than anyone else - how can anyone think they'd be fine in their home school? Weren't magnets made for just these children?