Anonymous wrote:That the mother is proud of her surname and is not the property of her husband, so she wants to give the child her name as well.
Anonymous wrote:I think nothing. At all. This doesn't even register as a thing to me. People have all kinds of names. Some are more familiar or pleasing to my ear but the vast majority of last names don't register as anything to me. I wouldn't even assume the double-barrel name is one name from each parent. As PPs have mentioned, there are naming conventions in other countries where double-barreled last names are the norm.
If you are drawing conclusions from this, what else are you drawing conclusions from? The ethnicity of the names? When you see a Jewish name, what do you think? Or a very Anglo-Saxon name? What random conclusions about people are you forming based on nothing but their name?
You need a hobby that isn't judging people based on dumb sh$t.
Anonymous wrote:It’s always seemed a bit selfish to me. Like the parents are thinking about being equally represented more than what a pain having a hyphenated name will be for the child. It also doesn’t work through generations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love it, the father's name, and then the mother's father's name. #feminism #slay
Love that the reason you think this is some sort of “gotcha” is that you believe a woman’s birth name doesn’t actually belong to her, while a man’s birth name does.
Anonymous wrote:Love it, the father's name, and then the mother's father's name. #feminism #slay
Anonymous wrote:Love it, the father's name, and then the mother's father's name. #feminism #slay