Anonymous wrote:Good. Right choice. Sorry in-person teacher who can't teach from home apparently, even presumably having to for the first half of the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here who signed up to teach in person. I am unable to teach from my house so I am glad DCPS called a two hour delay. It’s wrong to think teachers that are in person should easily go from in person teaching to virtual. My in person lessons look way different from my virtual ones.
Parents really have no clue what it is to create lesson plans or the difference between teaching in person versus online. I’m constantly amazed at the ignorance posted on this forum, especially when it couple with rage. Parents are getting a glimpse into their kids’ school day and suddenly they’ve become experts on teaching and curriculum design. Morons.
Quit making parents do 50%+ of your JOB and they'll let you be the so-called professional you see yourself as. If I wanted to be an education professional I would have gone to university for that. Teachers want to be seen as professionals only when it's convenient or serves their argument. Otherwise, they are somehow a special population who rules should be rewritten or sidestepped for.
I’m a parent, not a teacher. I taught at the college level though. Your level of vitriol is astounding. Seek help. Teachers do not deserve this hostility. We are all coping with this pandemic nightmare. Stop complaining and see what you can do to help. While I would like for my kids to be back in school, I also recognize this whole pandemic has been mismanaged at every level of the government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here who signed up to teach in person. I am unable to teach from my house so I am glad DCPS called a two hour delay. It’s wrong to think teachers that are in person should easily go from in person teaching to virtual. My in person lessons look way different from my virtual ones.
Parents really have no clue what it is to create lesson plans or the difference between teaching in person versus online. I’m constantly amazed at the ignorance posted on this forum, especially when it couple with rage. Parents are getting a glimpse into their kids’ school day and suddenly they’ve become experts on teaching and curriculum design. Morons.
Quit making parents do 50%+ of your JOB and they'll let you be the so-called professional you see yourself as. If I wanted to be an education professional I would have gone to university for that. Teachers want to be seen as professionals only when it's convenient or serves their argument. Otherwise, they are somehow a special population who rules should be rewritten or sidestepped for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:two-hour delays make no sense. For equity sake you have to do the same for everyone, so the in-person kids are two hours late but so are the virtual kids. Just make everyone remote for the day again! So stupid.
The start time for virtual students should not be delayed. This isn't equity.
At our school, the teachers simulcast the lesson to the in-person and virtual kids from the classroom, so there isn't any way to have different start times for the two groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:two-hour delays make no sense. For equity sake you have to do the same for everyone, so the in-person kids are two hours late but so are the virtual kids. Just make everyone remote for the day again! So stupid.
The start time for virtual students should not be delayed. This isn't equity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what is simulcast? I can't keep up on the terminology. It was hard enough to figure out asynchronous. Please, someone explain so a dummy like me can understand.
I might not be using the right term. There are kids in person and kids that the teacher is teaching to at home at the same time. Concurrent is maybe another term for it? I don’t even know any more except that it’s a hot mess.
Yeah I still agree with other posters that it should just be a full virtual day for all students. A two hour delay is dumb when you can easily switch to virtual learning.
Not for families who need the CARES classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here who signed up to teach in person. I am unable to teach from my house so I am glad DCPS called a two hour delay. It’s wrong to think teachers that are in person should easily go from in person teaching to virtual. My in person lessons look way different from my virtual ones.
Parents really have no clue what it is to create lesson plans or the difference between teaching in person versus online. I’m constantly amazed at the ignorance posted on this forum, especially when it couple with rage. Parents are getting a glimpse into their kids’ school day and suddenly they’ve become experts on teaching and curriculum design. Morons.
Anonymous wrote:Teacher here who signed up to teach in person. I am unable to teach from my house so I am glad DCPS called a two hour delay. It’s wrong to think teachers that are in person should easily go from in person teaching to virtual. My in person lessons look way different from my virtual ones.
Anonymous wrote:just proves again that dcps didn't think things through and plan for anything. 80% of kids aren't IPL so because of the 20% we are all without school. Its ridiculous.
Our school has IPL isolated classrooms, not simulcast (which sounds worse than DL - someone tell me how its good for all kids and how, I don't see it). So 83% of our kids are not getting instruction when their teachers are home ready to teach and know how.