Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This gets shut down each time it's posted but you can't argue with medical facts. Mother nature does not care that more women now are pursuing careers.
The reality is that it's much more difficult to get pregnant at 35 than it is at 25. And it's nearly impossible after 40. Money and procedures can sometimes help, but there really are many women out there that waited too long and missed the boat.
Your body wants to have a baby between the ages of about 17 and 30. After that it's more difficult and riskier.
Are you saying that women should be having babies at 17, 18, 19? They should forgo college and a solid career because biology hasn't caught up with our culture?
Biologically, I might have been able to have a kid at 17, 20, 25, but emotionally, mentally, financially, I was no where near ready. Would you be willing to pay a lot more taxes to support 17 yr olds having kids, making sure that they have access to daycare, or are you advocating that 17 yr olds should drop out of school to have babies because nature intended for a 17 yr old to have babies?
How about the daddies? What's their role in all this? Do you think a 17 yr old guy is ready to take on the responsibilities of being a dad just because biologically he is able to produce the sperm necessary to procreate?
FFS.
The melodrama lol. She's saying biologically, we were made to have children in late teens/early 20s. She's not advocating for mass teen pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This gets shut down each time it's posted but you can't argue with medical facts. Mother nature does not care that more women now are pursuing careers.
The reality is that it's much more difficult to get pregnant at 35 than it is at 25. And it's nearly impossible after 40. Money and procedures can sometimes help, but there really are many women out there that waited too long and missed the boat.
Your body wants to have a baby between the ages of about 17 and 30. After that it's more difficult and riskier.
Are you saying that women should be having babies at 17, 18, 19? They should forgo college and a solid career because biology hasn't caught up with our culture?
Biologically, I might have been able to have a kid at 17, 20, 25, but emotionally, mentally, financially, I was no where near ready. Would you be willing to pay a lot more taxes to support 17 yr olds having kids, making sure that they have access to daycare, or are you advocating that 17 yr olds should drop out of school to have babies because nature intended for a 17 yr old to have babies?
How about the daddies? What's their role in all this? Do you think a 17 yr old guy is ready to take on the responsibilities of being a dad just because biologically he is able to produce the sperm necessary to procreate?
FFS.
Anonymous wrote:Not in DC. I had my first at 36; most of my friends back home in Texas had 5-10 year olds at the time.
Anonymous wrote:No, but fertility rate starts to decline really fast.
Anonymous wrote:This gets shut down each time it's posted but you can't argue with medical facts. Mother nature does not care that more women now are pursuing careers.
The reality is that it's much more difficult to get pregnant at 35 than it is at 25. And it's nearly impossible after 40. Money and procedures can sometimes help, but there really are many women out there that waited too long and missed the boat.
Your body wants to have a baby between the ages of about 17 and 30. After that it's more difficult and riskier.
Anonymous wrote:This gets shut down each time it's posted but you can't argue with medical facts. Mother nature does not care that more women now are pursuing careers.
The reality is that it's much more difficult to get pregnant at 35 than it is at 25. And it's nearly impossible after 40. Money and procedures can sometimes help, but there really are many women out there that waited too long and missed the boat.
Your body wants to have a baby between the ages of about 17 and 30. After that it's more difficult and riskier.
Anonymous wrote:This gets shut down each time it's posted but you can't argue with medical facts. Mother nature does not care that more women now are pursuing careers.
The reality is that it's much more difficult to get pregnant at 35 than it is at 25. And it's nearly impossible after 40. Money and procedures can sometimes help, but there really are many women out there that waited too long and missed the boat.
Your body wants to have a baby between the ages of about 17 and 30. After that it's more difficult and riskier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am 28 and a friend who is 29 recently told me I need to get married soon-ish or I'll "have" to have my first baby at 30 lmfao. First of all, I think the ship for having a baby at 30 has sailed unless I meet The One and get engaged and married AND pregnant within the next two years haha. Second of all, she said it like it was so tragic. I don't know anyone my age who has children; I figure most people here are at least 30 when they have their first.
I agree with you that this is true for DMV.
But don't give up. You can freeze your eggs now. It's better to have a back up plan than finding out later that your eggs are too old.
And don't listen to these moms on this board. 35 year olds calling themselves "young" while talking trash by calling others "old".
Anonymous wrote:I am 28 and a friend who is 29 recently told me I need to get married soon-ish or I'll "have" to have my first baby at 30 lmfao. First of all, I think the ship for having a baby at 30 has sailed unless I meet The One and get engaged and married AND pregnant within the next two years haha. Second of all, she said it like it was so tragic. I don't know anyone my age who has children; I figure most people here are at least 30 when they have their first.