Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no sex trafficking in Pretty Woman. She doesn’t have a pimp. Don’t compare her to a sex trafficked victim.
The movie makes prostitution seem fairy tale line - rich guy, fast car, new life, new clothes, set for life, jewelry, helicopter, etc.
Prostitution is nothing like that.
Right...because it’s a movie.
And, lots of young girls with sugar daddies have an experience better than Julia’s.
Again: none of this is sex trafficking.
Anonymous wrote:Bc Julia Roberts is so charming in it, with her giant smile. So we just "tra lala" over the hooker parts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You'd have to ask the Hollywood producers who greenlighted this predictable piece of trash. Handsome rich guy chooses to protect his emotions, but a beautiful whore with a heart of gold makes him open his heart! Edgy!
Whore?
Wow. Talk about misogyny.
It's the standard idiom.
http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/Whore_with_a_heart_of_gold
And sure, any term other than "sex worker" is misogynistic, but so is every element of Pretty Woman, in which Julia Roberts's character claims to want a "fairy tale."
There’s nothing wrong with wanting the fairytale. That’s a metaphor for falling in love with a good guy and living happily ever after. Everyone wants that.
Dehumanizing a woman by labeling her a whore is awful. It’s 2021...be better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A great movie and holds up surprisingly well! Not perfectly, but surprisingly well.
I don't have a daughter, but I wouldn't want to send the message to my daughter that being saved by a wealthy guy is the way to go. Or that wealthy guys are always middle aged white men.
Great thing that there are movies like this to use as conversation starters, huh?
THIS.
I hate idiots who think movies/books/TV shows must be "good" to be...good.
"Oh, I don't like that Blanche DuBois. She's not a nice person."![]()
![]()
![]()
"NICE" is not the only redeeming quality or worthy subject for artistic exploration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You'd have to ask the Hollywood producers who greenlighted this predictable piece of trash. Handsome rich guy chooses to protect his emotions, but a beautiful whore with a heart of gold makes him open his heart! Edgy!
Whore?
Wow. Talk about misogyny.
It's the standard idiom.
http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/Whore_with_a_heart_of_gold
And sure, any term other than "sex worker" is misogynistic, but so is every element of Pretty Woman, in which Julia Roberts's character claims to want a "fairy tale."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A great movie and holds up surprisingly well! Not perfectly, but surprisingly well.
I don't have a daughter, but I wouldn't want to send the message to my daughter that being saved by a wealthy guy is the way to go. Or that wealthy guys are always middle aged white men.
Great thing that there are movies like this to use as conversation starters, huh?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You'd have to ask the Hollywood producers who greenlighted this predictable piece of trash. Handsome rich guy chooses to protect his emotions, but a beautiful whore with a heart of gold makes him open his heart! Edgy!
Whore?
Wow. Talk about misogyny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no sex trafficking in Pretty Woman. She doesn’t have a pimp. Don’t compare her to a sex trafficked victim.
The movie makes prostitution seem fairy tale line - rich guy, fast car, new life, new clothes, set for life, jewelry, helicopter, etc.
Prostitution is nothing like that.
Anonymous wrote:There is no sex trafficking in Pretty Woman. She doesn’t have a pimp. Don’t compare her to a sex trafficked victim.