Anonymous wrote:I think Princeton did a study that athletes did better overall in terms salary and donations. It’s not all about test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are the “B” students managing the “A” students, because of their political and people skills at a business started by a “c”
Student from public colleges.
"People skills" was only ever enough to become a mediocre lower/middle-management type. And in today's highly technical world, its not even enough to be lower-middle management, as management is expected to keep up technically with the staff.
The overwhelming number of CEOs and executive suite, even moreso today, tend to be those that excelled in an academic environment from an early age, went to magnet schools, etc.
The trope of B-students managing A-students is essentially a trope for dummies to feel good about themselves.
As for athletes in Ivy League schools, these students are more than capable of doing well, especially with the rampant grade inflation at the Ivies where failing a class is impossible. They get tutors, generally come from wealth because sports tend to cost a fortune, went to prep schools and thus have familial connections.
Being an athlete can be an advantage for business schools (MBA), and recruiters look highly upon athletes as they know the student is dedicated and is able to manage time.
Note that the vast majority of Ivy sports are esoteric sports that the vast majority of US population doesn't participate in i.e. equestrian, rowing, skiing, etc., not football, basketball, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^Those other teams are rowing, equestrian, polo, et. al. These are sports that require an extremely large parental financial investment from an early age, so no wonder their students do well in academics as well.
My kids sport was track. Shoes are relatively cheap. I met many engineering majors on his team. Several from modest backgrounds.
Anonymous wrote:^Those other teams are rowing, equestrian, polo, et. al. These are sports that require an extremely large parental financial investment from an early age, so no wonder their students do well in academics as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The OP seems to assume that the curriculum at the Ivies are so tough that above-average students wouldn't be able to cut it or even pass classes.
It's not. Perhaps if we were talking about engineering/physics at MIT or Caltech, OP would have a point. But its impossible to fail humanities courses at any college in America.
This.
Most Ivy athletes are business or communications... not engineering. Maybe 1 or 2 on the roster can handle engineering.
Anonymous wrote:The OP seems to assume that the curriculum at the Ivies are so tough that above-average students wouldn't be able to cut it or even pass classes.
It's not. Perhaps if we were talking about engineering/physics at MIT or Caltech, OP would have a point. But its impossible to fail humanities courses at any college in America.
Anonymous wrote:Good with math, good with people. I’d say the folks who I knew who were athletes at a lower Ivy (Penn) fit the bill. This is what Corporations are looking for - not the know it all brainiac who is as conceited as the earlier poster. Remember you have to have skills to motivate your peers and to understand the data you are getting - what better training than being an athlete on a solid team? What is a sport but a very advanced and real time spatial exam? In addition the greatest lesson an athlete learns is time management.
Anonymous wrote:Recruits’ minimal requirements are 3.5 HS gpa and 1250 SAT. They do as well as any 3.5 1250 students.
Anonymous wrote:Recruits’ minimal requirements are 3.5 HS gpa and 1250 SAT. They do as well as any 3.5 1250 students.