Anonymous wrote:Elrich won becuase it was a 6-way primary and the moderate vote got spread among the rest. Elrich focused on a few key groups (unions, ultra-progessives, socialists) and that was enough to squeak by with a win. Then he was up against crackpot Ficker in the general so that was an easy win.
One solution is open primaries. Then the top 2 of any party in the primary end up in the general, and it also gives the people of MoCo more of a say (33% of registered voters are independents = can't vote in primaries except for BOE).
I have friends in the GOP in MD. The problem is the moderates get derailed by the right-wingers and then they end up with candidates who will not do well with the general public. Hogan was the exception to this -- he managed to get through that and he's a moderate Republican.
Also a lot of the "noise" from the County comes from the progressive Takoma Park triangle, and that's where most Council members are from too. That's not what all of MoCo is about -- especially areas upcounty like Germantown/Clarksburg the people are more moderate in their views generally. The few times I've met with Elrich, I always tell him to think of the entire county and not just certain parts of it.
Anonymous wrote:Blair is an Obama Democrat. Elrich is a Bernie Sanders Socialist. There is a difference but both are left of center. I think it's time we balance things out with someone in the true center, or center-right. Another Hogan would be great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need ranked voting. In a crowded county exec field like the last primary, someone like Elrich is always going to win.
That and more participation in the primaries- that’s where the main contest takes place, for better or worse, but so many voters sit it out or don’t officially affiliate with the Democratic Party, even if they generally vote that way in the general.
"Someone like Elrich," meaning what? Not to mention that Elrich only had about 80 more votes than Blair, and the election could easily have come out the other way. So are you putting Blair in the category of "someone like Elrich"?
The most extreme/progressive. The other candidates were more moderate but split the vote. Come on, Elrich was generally your first choice or last.
Blair is another leftwing wolf in sheep's clothing. He was more rhetorically pro-business but he's another far left Wokester. He campaigned in favor of free government programs for illegal immigrants and defunding the police.
If you're putting Blair in the same category as Elrich, then you're a member of the Republican Party that causes Montgomery County to only elect Democrats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need ranked voting. In a crowded county exec field like the last primary, someone like Elrich is always going to win.
That and more participation in the primaries- that’s where the main contest takes place, for better or worse, but so many voters sit it out or don’t officially affiliate with the Democratic Party, even if they generally vote that way in the general.
"Someone like Elrich," meaning what? Not to mention that Elrich only had about 80 more votes than Blair, and the election could easily have come out the other way. So are you putting Blair in the category of "someone like Elrich"?
The most extreme/progressive. The other candidates were more moderate but split the vote. Come on, Elrich was generally your first choice or last.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need ranked voting. In a crowded county exec field like the last primary, someone like Elrich is always going to win.
That and more participation in the primaries- that’s where the main contest takes place, for better or worse, but so many voters sit it out or don’t officially affiliate with the Democratic Party, even if they generally vote that way in the general.
"Someone like Elrich," meaning what? Not to mention that Elrich only had about 80 more votes than Blair, and the election could easily have come out the other way. So are you putting Blair in the category of "someone like Elrich"?
The most extreme/progressive. The other candidates were more moderate but split the vote. Come on, Elrich was generally your first choice or last.
Blair is another leftwing wolf in sheep's clothing. He was more rhetorically pro-business but he's another far left Wokester. He campaigned in favor of free government programs for illegal immigrants and defunding the police.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need ranked voting. In a crowded county exec field like the last primary, someone like Elrich is always going to win.
That and more participation in the primaries- that’s where the main contest takes place, for better or worse, but so many voters sit it out or don’t officially affiliate with the Democratic Party, even if they generally vote that way in the general.
"Someone like Elrich," meaning what? Not to mention that Elrich only had about 80 more votes than Blair, and the election could easily have come out the other way. So are you putting Blair in the category of "someone like Elrich"?
The most extreme/progressive. The other candidates were more moderate but split the vote. Come on, Elrich was generally your first choice or last.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need ranked voting. In a crowded county exec field like the last primary, someone like Elrich is always going to win.
That and more participation in the primaries- that’s where the main contest takes place, for better or worse, but so many voters sit it out or don’t officially affiliate with the Democratic Party, even if they generally vote that way in the general.
"Someone like Elrich," meaning what? Not to mention that Elrich only had about 80 more votes than Blair, and the election could easily have come out the other way. So are you putting Blair in the category of "someone like Elrich"?
Anonymous wrote:We need ranked voting. In a crowded county exec field like the last primary, someone like Elrich is always going to win.
That and more participation in the primaries- that’s where the main contest takes place, for better or worse, but so many voters sit it out or don’t officially affiliate with the Democratic Party, even if they generally vote that way in the general.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. The Council chose the representatives for the Redistricting Commission. They've cooked the books before it even begins.
Folks do need to wake up if they want any real changes. And I say this as a moderate Democrat. You all are about to lose your police department and I just wonder if anyone is even paying attention.
Oh good grief. No, we are not about to lose our police department, whatever that would even mean.
Yeah, you are. They are getting it from both sides -- public and politicians. All the good ones are leaving. You'll be left with the likes of Baltimore.
Nah, these guys love their good MoCo paycheck that they can take back to more rural parts of MD and PA. The police union huffs & puffs, but where else are these guys gonna work with such a robust tax base?
All talk. They have to deal with independent oversight moving forward. Waaaah, too bad.
Actually, the MoCo police department is one of the lowest paid in the region. There used to be hundreds of applicants for the academy each year, but now they are struggling to even fill seats. MoCo is currently an undesirable department because of the working conditions, primarily a very hostile council that doesn’t respect the officers or their contract. It’s easy for us to look in from the outside and criticize, isn’t it?