Anonymous wrote:What you're missing is that university admissions are not based on a meritocacy in this country.
Diversity is everything here. Which means that someone who checks a box on a form that you child doesn't check will overtake someone like your child who has way better scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what some posters are saying, scores still matter if you are white, Asian, or rich. That may not be woke, but it’s true. Test optional is for admitting URM, first-gen, and low income. To have a good shot at admission, your score should be above the school’s 50th percentile, ideally around the 75th percentile. Also, many colleges require applicants to apply to a specific school, and scores can vary depending on school. A quarter to one-third of admits at selective schools go to diversity applicants and athletes. You will be competing with the upper half of applicants. Applying to publics, you must take into account quotas to admit state residents. There are also international students, whose applications are ramping again with the change in Administration. International students are full-pay, so schools like them. After accessing all these variables, be reasonable. People like to dream, but being reasonable yields better results.
Rich is full pay and absolutely a hook.
Not at a needs-blind school, which is most, if not all, of the most selective schools. For solid, but less selective privates, yes. Some more selective publics too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Despite what some posters are saying, scores still matter if you are white, Asian, or rich. That may not be woke, but it’s true. Test optional is for admitting URM, first-gen, and low income. To have a good shot at admission, your score should be above the school’s 50th percentile, ideally around the 75th percentile. Also, many colleges require applicants to apply to a specific school, and scores can vary depending on school. A quarter to one-third of admits at selective schools go to diversity applicants and athletes. You will be competing with the upper half of applicants. Applying to publics, you must take into account quotas to admit state residents. There are also international students, whose applications are ramping again with the change in Administration. International students are full-pay, so schools like them. After accessing all these variables, be reasonable. People like to dream, but being reasonable yields better results.
Rich is full pay and absolutely a hook.
Anonymous wrote:Despite what some posters are saying, scores still matter if you are white, Asian, or rich. That may not be woke, but it’s true. Test optional is for admitting URM, first-gen, and low income. To have a good shot at admission, your score should be above the school’s 50th percentile, ideally around the 75th percentile. Also, many colleges require applicants to apply to a specific school, and scores can vary depending on school. A quarter to one-third of admits at selective schools go to diversity applicants and athletes. You will be competing with the upper half of applicants. Applying to publics, you must take into account quotas to admit state residents. There are also international students, whose applications are ramping again with the change in Administration. International students are full-pay, so schools like them. After accessing all these variables, be reasonable. People like to dream, but being reasonable yields better results.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS got 33 on ACT, which according to charts is in the top 1.5%, let’s even say 2%. Then add in SAT takers and say there is some overlap of top scorers so top 3%. There are 3 million college students nationwide in each class. So top 90,000. Or about 90,00 higher ranked by test score. DS has 3.9 uw 4.5 w and I would think average record of APs and ECs. Might be on high end but let’s just say this would not move needle. If Ivy League fills 20,000 of the 90,000 (estimate Brown might be 1,000 but Penn is 4,000). Then you have those tippy top publics like UNC, Michigan, UCLA, etc filling another 50k. Then add in the likes of Vanderbilt, Rice, Duke and it is well over the 90,000. And this does not even factor in that MANY kids don’t has the support/inclination to go out of state. I just don’t understand how my kid is reach for Middlebury, Emory, Wake Forest, USC, etc. Where do all the students come from? I get there are Athletes and legacies without the stats but it just doesn’t add up to me. I also get the test score is not the be all end all - but are there really kids with more APs than 10 and 4.0 with lower test score that is skewing this number. I am missing something in the math as to how it is possible for my DS to be shut out of top 30 (has not happened yet) but courteous for insight.
A lot has been said but honestly your child's stats are not all that competitive for top schools. They are definitely amazing but expectations need to be lowered...
Anonymous wrote:DS got 33 on ACT, which according to charts is in the top 1.5%, let’s even say 2%. Then add in SAT takers and say there is some overlap of top scorers so top 3%. There are 3 million college students nationwide in each class. So top 90,000. Or about 90,00 higher ranked by test score. DS has 3.9 uw 4.5 w and I would think average record of APs and ECs. Might be on high end but let’s just say this would not move needle. If Ivy League fills 20,000 of the 90,000 (estimate Brown might be 1,000 but Penn is 4,000). Then you have those tippy top publics like UNC, Michigan, UCLA, etc filling another 50k. Then add in the likes of Vanderbilt, Rice, Duke and it is well over the 90,000. And this does not even factor in that MANY kids don’t has the support/inclination to go out of state. I just don’t understand how my kid is reach for Middlebury, Emory, Wake Forest, USC, etc. Where do all the students come from? I get there are Athletes and legacies without the stats but it just doesn’t add up to me. I also get the test score is not the be all end all - but are there really kids with more APs than 10 and 4.0 with lower test score that is skewing this number. I am missing something in the math as to how it is possible for my DS to be shut out of top 30 (has not happened yet) but courteous for insight.
Anonymous wrote:International is WAAAYYYY down. Pandemic, US response and xenophobia and racism as shown by previous administration has made many international students go to Canada, New Zealand, Germany (for some strange reason).
Compared to 2019-20, the volume of international applicants has increased by about 9% this year according to data from the Common App, as of January 22
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regarding U Penn’s 2400 kids, don’t forget half are boys and half are girls. Then, there are the internationals.
And the athletes and legacies.
International is WAAAYYYY down. Pandemic, US response and xenophobia and racism as shown by previous administration has made many international students go to Canada, New Zealand, Germany (for some strange reason).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regarding U Penn’s 2400 kids, don’t forget half are boys and half are girls. Then, there are the internationals.
And the athletes and legacies.