Anonymous wrote:Don’t be such a downer. Schools aren’t super spreaders. DCPS is back!
Anonymous wrote:If the new more contagious variant ends up dominating
the US as it has done in England, all schools will need to SHUT down. Right now predictions are that it will form the majority of new cases by March.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The wait list appears to be working. We got an email today offering us a spot in a K-2 in person class.
See? PPs need to relax.
I'm a new poster. But to the comment on relaxing, we are a family that would like to go back and have not been offered a slot yet. And, honestly, it is hard to be among the few that are not allowed back while others get at least a little in person instruction. So, I guess I ask on behalf of us families affected that you have a little compassion.
DP here. I hope you get a spot. That wasn't a nice comment from pp telling people to relax. DL is horrible for most kids so of course parents are concerned for their children. We got a spot because DC has an IEP, but trust me you wouldn't want to trade places with us if it meant taking the SN too.
I hope all DCPS schools open up back to normal for term 4 (no WTU troll responses please).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The wait list appears to be working. We got an email today offering us a spot in a K-2 in person class.
See? PPs need to relax.
I'm a new poster. But to the comment on relaxing, we are a family that would like to go back and have not been offered a slot yet. And, honestly, it is hard to be among the few that are not allowed back while others get at least a little in person instruction. So, I guess I ask on behalf of us families affected that you have a little compassion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The wait list appears to be working. We got an email today offering us a spot in a K-2 in person class.
See? PPs need to relax.
Anonymous wrote:The wait list appears to be working. We got an email today offering us a spot in a K-2 in person class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, PP is correct. To get 22 kids in over the day that requires 2 classrooms. Even IF every teacher said they would do in person, they can not accommodate that.
At Lafayette they have 6 K classrooms and with an alternating schedule they could make it work. It is a staffing + flexibility issue. They didn't have enough teachers to provide IPL and they discounted any type of hybrid model that would require the teachers to teach more than 20 students.
How in gods name would you expect an online class of 30 kindergartners to work? Your proposal basically is to screw the kids at home in favor of kids in school. I know plenty of kids who can't come in -- so they don't deserve to learn? I'm sorry you are angry you didn't get a slot, but my goodness your suggestion is outrageous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why there isn't capacity for K-2 kids who want to be in person. If each class is cut in half (between AM and PM cohorts), and they have the physical space plus all the teachers that they advertised as in person last week, why can they not have enough capacity for all the kids who want to be in person? Class size is capped to begin with and that is school-wide so the K-2 classes shouldn't be any bigger than the other grades. SOOOO frustrated.
I don't necessarily think schools have the physical space. If there is an AM and PM group per teacher, they are using 2 classrooms. So if 4 2nd grade teachers returned for AM/PM half days, they would need 8 classrooms. That takes up more than a floor for many schools, I'm sure.
Why the need to use two classrooms for the AM/PM groups? Janney is doing that as well. An hour between the two groups is adequate to clean the classrooms if the two groups shared one. Surface transmission is not a primary route of infection. They could get a lot more kids in the building if the am and pm groups shared one class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why there isn't capacity for K-2 kids who want to be in person. If each class is cut in half (between AM and PM cohorts), and they have the physical space plus all the teachers that they advertised as in person last week, why can they not have enough capacity for all the kids who want to be in person? Class size is capped to begin with and that is school-wide so the K-2 classes shouldn't be any bigger than the other grades. SOOOO frustrated.
I don't necessarily think schools have the physical space. If there is an AM and PM group per teacher, they are using 2 classrooms. So if 4 2nd grade teachers returned for AM/PM half days, they would need 8 classrooms. That takes up more than a floor for many schools, I'm sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, PP is correct. To get 22 kids in over the day that requires 2 classrooms. Even IF every teacher said they would do in person, they can not accommodate that.
At Lafayette they have 6 K classrooms and with an alternating schedule they could make it work. It is a staffing + flexibility issue. They didn't have enough teachers to provide IPL and they discounted any type of hybrid model that would require the teachers to teach more than 20 students.
How in gods name would you expect an online class of 30 kindergartners to work? Your proposal basically is to screw the kids at home in favor of kids in school. I know plenty of kids who can't come in -- so they don't deserve to learn? I'm sorry you are angry you didn't get a slot, but my goodness your suggestion is outrageous.
Now the claws come out. The PPP wants her kid in and f*** everyone else
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, PP is correct. To get 22 kids in over the day that requires 2 classrooms. Even IF every teacher said they would do in person, they can not accommodate that.
At Lafayette they have 6 K classrooms and with an alternating schedule they could make it work. It is a staffing + flexibility issue. They didn't have enough teachers to provide IPL and they discounted any type of hybrid model that would require the teachers to teach more than 20 students.
How in gods name would you expect an online class of 30 kindergartners to work? Your proposal basically is to screw the kids at home in favor of kids in school. I know plenty of kids who can't come in -- so they don't deserve to learn? I'm sorry you are angry you didn't get a slot, but my goodness your suggestion is outrageous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, PP is correct. To get 22 kids in over the day that requires 2 classrooms. Even IF every teacher said they would do in person, they can not accommodate that.
At Lafayette they have 6 K classrooms and with an alternating schedule they could make it work. It is a staffing + flexibility issue. They didn't have enough teachers to provide IPL and they discounted any type of hybrid model that would require the teachers to teach more than 20 students.