It looks dried out.

Don't really care hw long or short she wears her hair. But it seems to make her hold her head so stiffly. That in combination with her entirely heavily scripted remarks gives her such a robotic demeanor. If her hair is contributing to her not moving her head naturally, she should cut it off.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you going off about that fact that she is too old to have hair that long - stop it. We are never too old to do things that make us happy and that hurt no one. My grandmother had hair down to her waist and I loved - she wore it braided around her head in a coronet most days but much better then q-tip old hair!

Back to Kelly - she just looks too much like Barbie doll/Real House Wives wannabe for me.

Yeah, I agree with this. It's not the length itself, it's the way she styles it.

Oh really? So how would a woman her age style hair that length to have it look good? Like a Duggar? Or maybe she should braid it and wrap it around her head like the PP suggests?

I can't think of any way a professional woman over 50 can wear hair that long. If you are old, gray, and baking pies in your cottage, then yes..by all means grow to your back and wrap in a glorious crown. But for capital hill..??

Lol gtfo with this nonsense. I have always had long hair and I plan to keep it as I get older so you can die mad about it I guess. Is your issue that yours won’t grow? There are plenty of elegant updos a woman “over 50” could do with long hair that don’t give off a “baking pies in a cottage” vibe.

Hair won’t grow?? You don’t need to do anything to make hair grow...that is what hair does. No one is jealous because they don’t have hair down to their back.

I cannot think of a single woman with hair as long or longer than Kelly Loeffler over 50 that has a professional career and wears it down. I suppose you could wear an up do..but that would look rather prom like or 1960s beehive with that mass of hair. Post an example if you can find one

Anonymous wrote:Her hair looks great, those are expensive extensions. Overall, on the outside, she has a great and we'll put together look. I am sure it's expensive to maintain.

She looks great on the outside, but her soul is empty and ugly on the inside. Concerning for democracy. At least she conceded in her own election after the storming of the Capitol insurrection happened.

She also dropped her objections to the presidential elections, so I give her that.

Her hair looks great, those are expensive extensions. Overall, on the outside, she has a great and we'll put together look. I am sure it's expensive to maintain.

She looks great on the outside, but her soul is empty and ugly on the inside. Concerning for democracy. At least she conceded in her own election after the storming of the Capitol insurrection happened.

Anonymous wrote:I love that she's normalizing long hair on middle aged women.

Also, saying that long hair is unprofessional is no different than saying curly hair or african american hairstyles are unprofessional.

LOL please don’t put her and her ugly hair in the same category with curls or AA hair. She’s a rich white lady and not “normalizing” anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you going off about that fact that she is too old to have hair that long - stop it. We are never too old to do things that make us happy and that hurt no one. My grandmother had hair down to her waist and I loved - she wore it braided around her head in a coronet most days but much better then q-tip old hair!

Back to Kelly - she just looks too much like Barbie doll/Real House Wives wannabe for me.

Yeah, I agree with this. It's not the length itself, it's the way she styles it.

Oh really? So how would a woman her age style hair that length to have it look good? Like a Duggar? Or maybe she should braid it and wrap it around her head like the PP suggests?

I can't think of any way a professional woman over 50 can wear hair that long. If you are old, gray, and baking pies in your cottage, then yes..by all means grow to your back and wrap in a glorious crown. But for capital hill..??

Lol gtfo with this nonsense. I have always had long hair and I plan to keep it as I get older so you can die mad about it I guess. Is your issue that yours won’t grow? There are plenty of elegant updos a woman “over 50” could do with long hair that don’t give off a “baking pies in a cottage” vibe.

I'm the PP and I wasn't suggesting she do the Duggar thing - just giving an example. And my point was pick on her for her hair if you want but it shouldn't be about age. I agree with one of the other PP's - her face is too long and thin.

Long hair is NOT unprofessional. Lack of grooming, dirty clothing - that is unprofessional. I'll take long hair over keyhole purple dress that CNN anchor was wearing yesterday on the news any day But, hey - I work in the tech field where it's hard to be too casual and I don't miss the days when I had to wear hose, skirts only and heels at all.

I love that she's normalizing long hair on middle aged women.

Also, saying that long hair is unprofessional is no different than saying curly hair or african american hairstyles are unprofessional.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you going off about that fact that she is too old to have hair that long - stop it. We are never too old to do things that make us happy and that hurt no one. My grandmother had hair down to her waist and I loved - she wore it braided around her head in a coronet most days but much better then q-tip old hair!

Back to Kelly - she just looks too much like Barbie doll/Real House Wives wannabe for me.

Yeah, I agree with this. It's not the length itself, it's the way she styles it.

Oh really? So how would a woman her age style hair that length to have it look good? Like a Duggar? Or maybe she should braid it and wrap it around her head like the PP suggests?

I can't think of any way a professional woman over 50 can wear hair that long. If you are old, gray, and baking pies in your cottage, then yes..by all means grow to your back and wrap in a glorious crown. But for capital hill..??

Lol gtfo with this nonsense. I have always had long hair and I plan to keep it as I get older so you can die mad about it I guess. Is your issue that yours won’t grow? There are plenty of elegant updos a woman “over 50” could do with long hair that don’t give off a “baking pies in a cottage” vibe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In the first photo, I think if she cut it to the first layer, it would look great. It's the second tier of hair that takes it over the top.

Agreed. That was my thought when I saw this pic, too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of you going off about that fact that she is too old to have hair that long - stop it. We are never too old to do things that make us happy and that hurt no one. My grandmother had hair down to her waist and I loved - she wore it braided around her head in a coronet most days but much better then q-tip old hair!

Back to Kelly - she just looks too much like Barbie doll/Real House Wives wannabe for me.

Yeah, I agree with this. It's not the length itself, it's the way she styles it.

Oh really? So how would a woman her age style hair that length to have it look good? Like a Duggar? Or maybe she should braid it and wrap it around her head like the PP suggests?

I can't think of any way a professional woman over 50 can wear hair that long. If you are old, gray, and baking pies in your cottage, then yes..by all means grow to your back and wrap in a glorious crown. But for capital hill..??

Anonymous wrote:It’s awful. She looks like Sedition Barbie.

Sedition Barbie

It’s awful. She looks like Sedition Barbie.

Anonymous wrote:All of you going off about that fact that she is too old to have hair that long - stop it. We are never too old to do things that make us happy and that hurt no one. My grandmother had hair down to her waist and I loved - she wore it braided around her head in a coronet most days but much better then q-tip old hair!

Back to Kelly - she just looks too much like Barbie doll/Real House Wives wannabe for me.

So it’s not ok to object to hair length on basis of age, but ok to object on basis of looking like reality tv participants? Ok.

Anonymous wrote:

In the first photo, I think if she cut it to the first layer, it would look great. It's the second tier of hair that takes it over the top.