Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sela has been open to PreK 3 and 4 kids since Nov and is about to open up to students in all classes - parents are getting to chose in-person or virtual.
Communication has been excellent and planning has been thoughful.
Wow. For the first time ever I wish we were at Sela.
Can we have some links about their success and method to share with our admins?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son is at Two Rivers 4th Street. They have not been good at communicating what plans, if any, they have for in-person instruction beyond general aspirations that it will happen some day. They have talked about increasing “in person opportunities” but all we’ve seen so far is an in person, outdoor social event for my son’s class. The school is apparently offering a very small Cares-like class but only for the few kids who weren’t logging in to any of the online classes and wouldn’t/couldn’t do so after the school followed up with them. They have not announced any metric for what rate of infection would trigger a shift from DL to in person learning. HTH.
Maybe post on DCUM less, read more of the TR emails and attend some of the meetings and Q&A the school does every two weeks (same meetings they have done since school began). There is a big difference between not liking the outcome and not being told the outcome. TR has clearly communicated in advance of each term what their plans are. They have done surveys and published those survey results. In fact, the only part of your post that is accurate is that they have not set a metric.
I agree that TR sends a significant volume of communication, but its of very little substance. Teachers and staff will be able to get vaccinated beginning Jan. 25, there should be a reopening plan in place, beyond the CARES accommodation, even if its to say, we’re doing DL for the rest of the year (which is what they will likely do).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here are the LEAs' plans: https://osse.dc.gov/publication/lea-continuous-education-plans
I believe that KIPP, Friendship, Meridian, Truth, and BASIS all have at least some students coming into their buildings, but I don't know whether they are getting direct education from teachers or whether it's a learning hub model where they are watching DL from the school building.
Our school's plan is there and is for show only it seems. I.e., it includes where outdoor classrooms might go but they have no plans to have outdoor classrooms.
This is DCB and they have not been good about communicating that they have basically decided as little in person as possible and its really up to teachers if they offer it or not. They are also prioritizing a big construction project starting this spring. It's pretty maddening and I wouldn't recommend the school to new parents at this point even though we initially loved it.
Anonymous wrote:Sela has been open to PreK 3 and 4 kids since Nov and is about to open up to students in all classes - parents are getting to chose in-person or virtual.
Communication has been excellent and planning has been thoughful.
Anonymous wrote:Sela has been open to PreK 3 and 4 kids since Nov and is about to open up to students in all classes - parents are getting to chose in-person or virtual.
Communication has been excellent and planning has been thoughful.
Anonymous wrote:Sela has been open to PreK 3 and 4 kids since Nov and is about to open up to students in all classes - parents are getting to chose in-person or virtual.
Communication has been excellent and planning has been thoughful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son is at Two Rivers 4th Street. They have not been good at communicating what plans, if any, they have for in-person instruction beyond general aspirations that it will happen some day. They have talked about increasing “in person opportunities” but all we’ve seen so far is an in person, outdoor social event for my son’s class. The school is apparently offering a very small Cares-like class but only for the few kids who weren’t logging in to any of the online classes and wouldn’t/couldn’t do so after the school followed up with them. They have not announced any metric for what rate of infection would trigger a shift from DL to in person learning. HTH.
Maybe post on DCUM less, read more of the TR emails and attend some of the meetings and Q&A the school does every two weeks (same meetings they have done since school began). There is a big difference between not liking the outcome and not being told the outcome. TR has clearly communicated in advance of each term what their plans are. They have done surveys and published those survey results. In fact, the only part of your post that is accurate is that they have not set a metric.
I agree that TR sends a significant volume of communication, but its of very little substance. Teachers and staff will be able to get vaccinated beginning Jan. 25, there should be a reopening plan in place, beyond the CARES accommodation, even if its to say, we’re doing DL for the rest of the year (which is what they will likely do).
Anonymous wrote:My son is at Two Rivers 4th Street. They have not been good at communicating what plans, if any, they have for in-person instruction beyond general aspirations that it will happen some day. They have talked about increasing “in person opportunities” but all we’ve seen so far is an in person, outdoor social event for my son’s class. The school is apparently offering a very small Cares-like class but only for the few kids who weren’t logging in to any of the online classes and wouldn’t/couldn’t do so after the school followed up with them. They have not announced any metric for what rate of infection would trigger a shift from DL to in person learning. HTH.