Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
IDK, wouldn't we consider it a type of rape now in 2020 if a woman manipulated a man into impregnating her against his wishes?
Trapping a man with a pregnancy is NOT the same as rape. He wasn’t forced to have sex. And, in 2020, men can opt for a condom.
The scene was just yet another ridiculous piece of the weak, unbelievable story. It was less disturbing than the pulling out scenes.
She deliberately gets him drunk in order to "take advantage" of him and, iirc, he even tells her during the act that he doesn't want to come in her and she refuses to let him pull out.
If a man did that to a woman, it would be rape.
None of that happens in the Netflix series.
How do they portray it? I haven't seen the series yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
IDK, wouldn't we consider it a type of rape now in 2020 if a woman manipulated a man into impregnating her against his wishes?
Trapping a man with a pregnancy is NOT the same as rape. He wasn’t forced to have sex. And, in 2020, men can opt for a condom.
The scene was just yet another ridiculous piece of the weak, unbelievable story. It was less disturbing than the pulling out scenes.
She deliberately gets him drunk in order to "take advantage" of him and, iirc, he even tells her during the act that he doesn't want to come in her and she refuses to let him pull out.
If a man did that to a woman, it would be rape.
None of that happens in the Netflix series.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
IDK, wouldn't we consider it a type of rape now in 2020 if a woman manipulated a man into impregnating her against his wishes?
Trapping a man with a pregnancy is NOT the same as rape. He wasn’t forced to have sex. And, in 2020, men can opt for a condom.
The scene was just yet another ridiculous piece of the weak, unbelievable story. It was less disturbing than the pulling out scenes.
She deliberately gets him drunk in order to "take advantage" of him and, iirc, he even tells her during the act that he doesn't want to come in her and she refuses to let him pull out.
If a man did that to a woman, it would be rape.
None of that happens in the Netflix series.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
IDK, wouldn't we consider it a type of rape now in 2020 if a woman manipulated a man into impregnating her against his wishes?
Trapping a man with a pregnancy is NOT the same as rape. He wasn’t forced to have sex. And, in 2020, men can opt for a condom.
The scene was just yet another ridiculous piece of the weak, unbelievable story. It was less disturbing than the pulling out scenes.
She deliberately gets him drunk in order to "take advantage" of him and, iirc, he even tells her during the act that he doesn't want to come in her and she refuses to let him pull out.
If a man did that to a woman, it would be rape.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope we will find out who Lady Whistledown is. It could be the independent outspoken sister but that seems to obvious.
You can tell it’s Julie Andreas’ voice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
IDK, wouldn't we consider it a type of rape now in 2020 if a woman manipulated a man into impregnating her against his wishes?
Trapping a man with a pregnancy is NOT the same as rape. He wasn’t forced to have sex. And, in 2020, men can opt for a condom.
The scene was just yet another ridiculous piece of the weak, unbelievable story. It was less disturbing than the pulling out scenes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
IDK, wouldn't we consider it a type of rape now in 2020 if a woman manipulated a man into impregnating her against his wishes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It reminds of Drive Me Crazy.
I wish they would have cast a better Daphne. She’s too plain.
I love seeing Nicola from Derry Girls!
+1 to this, but not so much because of her looks. She seems mismatched to the Duke. Unlike Outlander where Clair and Jamie seemed matched, Daphne seems more like a girl, rather than a woman. I didn't read the books though so maybe this is how the character is supposed to be.
Daphne is plain and girlish in the books though. I haven't seen the show yet but the Duke is supposed to be way out of her league in every way possible (socially, financially, even looks wise). That's why they become friends first, because neither assumes there will ever be anything between them, and it will be mutually beneficial, He doesn't want to get married at all and she's having a hard time finding a husband. All the men look at her like a "little sister/friend" type. So she will repel husband hunters for him and his interest in her will make her more valuable to other men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.
That’s not rape. I read the Vox article, and I found it troubling to equate the scene with rape.
And, the whole storyline is irrational.
“I love you so deeply, but I won’t sleep with you anymore.” Riiiiiiiight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It reminds of Drive Me Crazy.
I wish they would have cast a better Daphne. She’s too plain.
I love seeing Nicola from Derry Girls!
+1 to this, but not so much because of her looks. She seems mismatched to the Duke. Unlike Outlander where Clair and Jamie seemed matched, Daphne seems more like a girl, rather than a woman. I didn't read the books though so maybe this is how the character is supposed to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It reminds of Drive Me Crazy.
I wish they would have cast a better Daphne. She’s too plain.
I love seeing Nicola from Derry Girls!
+1 to this, but not so much because of her looks. She seems mismatched to the Duke. Unlike Outlander where Clair and Jamie seemed matched, Daphne seems more like a girl, rather than a woman. I didn't read the books though so maybe this is how the character is supposed to be.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder what they do with the infamous rape/nonconsensual scene.