Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid made a huge mistake not applying ED, but did EA to 7 schools and deferred at every single one. ED admittance rates are way up at my kid's school, but EA is not doing well. Visited one college campus before coronavirus, so has no idea where he wants to go and his father is insisting he will be able to get into a T20 school that we have a very close connection to (including 7+figure donations), but doesn't have ED and my kid is not qualified to get into. Dad refuses to allow ED2, even though that is his best chance at one of these more mid-tier schools, which are a better fit for my son. I fear my husband is steering him toward some very bad decisions!
It seems like the 7+ figure donations would be your ticket...maybe no need to worry so much?
Because of those donations, a few economically stressed families can afford to send their kids to the school. Let's keep in mind this fact while judging if a donor also benefits from his/her donations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid made a huge mistake not applying ED, but did EA to 7 schools and deferred at every single one. ED admittance rates are way up at my kid's school, but EA is not doing well. Visited one college campus before coronavirus, so has no idea where he wants to go and his father is insisting he will be able to get into a T20 school that we have a very close connection to (including 7+figure donations), but doesn't have ED and my kid is not qualified to get into. Dad refuses to allow ED2, even though that is his best chance at one of these more mid-tier schools, which are a better fit for my son. I fear my husband is steering him toward some very bad decisions!
It seems like the 7+ figure donations would be your ticket...maybe no need to worry so much?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plenty of reasons, but doesn't hurt to lock in as many tuition payers (er... applicants) as possible when there are few drawbacks. That, plus more ED applicants than ever... Makes sense to me. Outcome is more or less the same as any other year, just skewed in terms of initial data.
Harvard took 150 less this year - that doesn’t seem to square with your thesis.
They have EA, not ED.
So what? the PPs point was that schools wanted to lock in more paying students. Obviously that wasn’t the case here - they took fewer students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plenty of reasons, but doesn't hurt to lock in as many tuition payers (er... applicants) as possible when there are few drawbacks. That, plus more ED applicants than ever... Makes sense to me. Outcome is more or less the same as any other year, just skewed in terms of initial data.
Harvard took 150 less this year - that doesn’t seem to square with your thesis.
They have EA, not ED.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plenty of reasons, but doesn't hurt to lock in as many tuition payers (er... applicants) as possible when there are few drawbacks. That, plus more ED applicants than ever... Makes sense to me. Outcome is more or less the same as any other year, just skewed in terms of initial data.
Harvard took 150 less this year - that doesn’t seem to square with your thesis.
They have EA, not ED.
Anonymous wrote:My kid made a huge mistake not applying ED, but did EA to 7 schools and deferred at every single one. ED admittance rates are way up at my kid's school, but EA is not doing well. Visited one college campus before coronavirus, so has no idea where he wants to go and his father is insisting he will be able to get into a T20 school that we have a very close connection to (including 7+figure donations), but doesn't have ED and my kid is not qualified to get into. Dad refuses to allow ED2, even though that is his best chance at one of these more mid-tier schools, which are a better fit for my son. I fear my husband is steering him toward some very bad decisions!
Anonymous wrote:Testing optional started with good intention, but it ended up benefiting colleges financially.. If this kind of ridiculous application continues, they may need to limit the number of college applications per a student. When there are so many applications like this, applicants don’t receive careful considerations they deserve spending so many hours to write essays etc.
Anonymous wrote:Testing optional started with good intention, but it ended up benefiting colleges financially.. If this kind of ridiculous application continues, they may need to limit the number of college applications per a student. When there are so many applications like this, applicants don’t receive careful considerations they deserve spending so many hours to write essays etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plenty of reasons, but doesn't hurt to lock in as many tuition payers (er... applicants) as possible when there are few drawbacks. That, plus more ED applicants than ever... Makes sense to me. Outcome is more or less the same as any other year, just skewed in terms of initial data.
Harvard took 150 less this year - that doesn’t seem to square with your thesis.
Anonymous wrote:What about other Ivy Plus schools? Duke, Chicago, Stanford, Northwestern?
Anonymous wrote:Plenty of reasons, but doesn't hurt to lock in as many tuition payers (er... applicants) as possible when there are few drawbacks. That, plus more ED applicants than ever... Makes sense to me. Outcome is more or less the same as any other year, just skewed in terms of initial data.