Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep him in private. I thought about sending my child to a big public after years of private and then came to my senses. Def don’t hold him back AND put him with less advanced kids at the same time!
Yes. I don’t see any benefit to the public school. I’m not Catholic, but I’d send DC to a Catholic private in a heartbeat, over an under-performing public. Then he gets to stay with his grade. Problem solved.
Anonymous wrote:Keep him in private. I thought about sending my child to a big public after years of private and then came to my senses. Def don’t hold him back AND put him with less advanced kids at the same time!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would like to do this with my child also. She's in fifth and smart, but the very youngest in her class and still plays with dolls. It's a tough call. In your case I definitely would put him in 6th.
I know multiple 6th grade girls who still play with dolls. Your daughter sounds great.
Anonymous wrote:Are you really allowed to decide this, OP? Where I live (not DC area) grade enrollment at the time of public school entry is entirely at the discretion of the principal. "My child is small and immature" would never, never be enough.
Anonymous wrote:My son has a late fall birthday and young for his current grade (5th). He currently goes to a small private school where 4-6th grade work all together and he has always been able to work at whatever level he needs. He is currently working on materials 2-3 grades above 5th grade in core subjects and tests 95-99% on standardized tests. He will stay in 6th grade at private, but then switch to public after. When he switches, I am thinking of sending him to public 6th instead of 7th. He doesn't know anyone so it won't be an issue of kids knowing he was "held back." He is small for his age and sensitive. Our public schools are underperforming and a pretty rough environment overall. I feel like he will do better socially being older instead of younger. But that would put him light years ahead of most his peer academically (our public school is below state proficiency averages). I think it may be ok though because starting in middle school, our district has an excellent and rigerous academically talented program where the qualifying kids are taking to a partnering state university for their core classes.
Has anyone held an older child back for purely social reasons even though they were academically advanced?