Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kids arrive at Deal and Hardy at varying math levels and are sorted into 3-4 paths. That means, every school that feeds into Deal differentiates, even if parents don't realize it (as in, if you are expecting an award certificate saying your kid is in the highest math group, you won't be seeing that; they won't even say it to you).
If you are starting in 6th grade at Deal, but are not coming from a feeder school, how do they know what math path to put your kid in? We plan to do that next year. The math at our current EOTP ES is very weak but our kid is excelling at the accelerated programs we have them enrolled in outside of school, and I want to make sure they are placed on the right path. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kids arrive at Deal and Hardy at varying math levels and are sorted into 3-4 paths. That means, every school that feeds into Deal differentiates, even if parents don't realize it (as in, if you are expecting an award certificate saying your kid is in the highest math group, you won't be seeing that; they won't even say it to you).
If you are starting in 6th grade at Deal, but are not coming from a feeder school, how do they know what math path to put your kid in? We plan to do that next year. The math at our current EOTP ES is very weak but our kid is excelling at the accelerated programs we have them enrolled in outside of school, and I want to make sure they are placed on the right path. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Kids arrive at Deal and Hardy at varying math levels and are sorted into 3-4 paths. That means, every school that feeds into Deal differentiates, even if parents don't realize it (as in, if you are expecting an award certificate saying your kid is in the highest math group, you won't be seeing that; they won't even say it to you).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP coming to add one last thing. Another reason for testing is that I was semi-hopeful (eternal optimist) that maybe if we came armed with test results and actual data that our school might consider they aren't meeting the needs of all learners (including our child, but I know there are others!). Still hopeful, but also trying to be realistic.
I very much doubt this would happen. Your child is not the first time they have had a kid who is talented at math.
I would very strongly not recommend Inspired Teaching, as there is very little math differentiation at all and it just doesn't feel like a priority. Not just this year but every year starting in K it has felt that way to me.
I would take a very good look at Seaton, their math MGP is impressive and I hear great things from people I know with math-loving kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what you do if you want to stay in DC public is deliberately accelerate your child yourself over the years. Hire a tutor, have them work out of Singapore Math and Saxon math workbooks, put the kid on Khan Academy videos, send them to Johns Hopkins CTY camps etc. Document their progress and bring the evidence to the school's math coordinator a couple times a year.
If teachers get fed up with the kid burning through math assignments fast and causing mischief while s/he waits for others to catch up, believe me, the school starts to deliver the math challenge, at least as long as the school is mostly high SES kids. The kid may be sent to the library to work on math software. Don't give up or give in and the differentiation starts to kick in as long as the kid really can work far ahead of grade level. That's been our experience.
Thanks for this. It helps to hear that documentation is important with getting help. And I absolutely won't give up (my kid doesn't suffer quietly, so I think I have no choice but push forward). Our school is not high SES (it is Title I). From a lot of the answers I am seeing, it appears that (with the exception of Seaton), all the schools mentioned that differentiate for math are high SES. This is a HUGE equity problem, because I can guarantee you high ability math students at our school are being missed and/or ignored because they are meeting grade levels stats and their parents aren't asking the school about providing more. There just isn't the parental push for programming, at least not historically.
My kid is absolutely burning through Singapore workbooks (I don't know about Saxon - will pick that one up next). I've gotta get back on the Khan, although we went away from it due to the 5 hours a day on synchronous instruction (doesn't leave much time for extra work or screen time). We don't really have the budget for a tutor - I got a quote that was like $75/hours (?!). I will try to find more, but I take it this might be the going rate (correct me if I am wrong).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what you do if you want to stay in DC public is deliberately accelerate your child yourself over the years. Hire a tutor, have them work out of Singapore Math and Saxon math workbooks, put the kid on Khan Academy videos, send them to Johns Hopkins CTY camps etc. Document their progress and bring the evidence to the school's math coordinator a couple times a year.
If teachers get fed up with the kid burning through math assignments fast and causing mischief while s/he waits for others to catch up, believe me, the school starts to deliver the math challenge, at least as long as the school is mostly high SES kids. The kid may be sent to the library to work on math software. Don't give up or give in and the differentiation starts to kick in as long as the kid really can work far ahead of grade level. That's been our experience.
Thanks for this. It helps to hear that documentation is important with getting help. And I absolutely won't give up (my kid doesn't suffer quietly, so I think I have no choice but push forward). Our school is not high SES (it is Title I). From a lot of the answers I am seeing, it appears that (with the exception of Seaton), all the schools mentioned that differentiate for math are high SES. This is a HUGE equity problem, because I can guarantee you high ability math students at our school are being missed and/or ignored because they are meeting grade levels stats and their parents aren't asking the school about providing more. There just isn't the parental push for programming, at least not historically.
My kid is absolutely burning through Singapore workbooks (I don't know about Saxon - will pick that one up next). I've gotta get back on the Khan, although we went away from it due to the 5 hours a day on synchronous instruction (doesn't leave much time for extra work or screen time). We don't really have the budget for a tutor - I got a quote that was like $75/hours (?!). I will try to find more, but I take it this might be the going rate (correct me if I am wrong).
Anonymous wrote:Our charter differentiates work to the level of the students using the two teachers in the classroom to effectively run different groups at different levels. But I am not going to tell you what school it is because you seem like a HUGE d-bag with comments like "you would be willing to lottery" (how lucky are we!) and that you somehow saw fit to have your 6 years old IQ tested. I love our school and community, and people like you would add nothing.
Anonymous wrote:OP, what you do if you want to stay in DC public is deliberately accelerate your child yourself over the years. Hire a tutor, have them work out of Singapore Math and Saxon math workbooks, put the kid on Khan Academy videos, send them to Johns Hopkins CTY camps etc. Document their progress and bring the evidence to the school's math coordinator a couple times a year.
If teachers get fed up with the kid burning through math assignments fast and causing mischief while s/he waits for others to catch up, believe me, the school starts to deliver the math challenge, at least as long as the school is mostly high SES kids. The kid may be sent to the library to work on math software. Don't give up or give in and the differentiation starts to kick in as long as the kid really can work far ahead of grade level. That's been our experience.