Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Omg don’t blame the curriculum a whole district buys and says teachers have to use on the teachers. How much say do you have over how your leadership tells you to do elements of your job?
It’s interesting that you (teachers) can band together for so many things, like keeping schools shut down, but when it comes to what you teach, you don’t have a voice. OhhhhhhK.
The problem is, enough teachers think that current methods and curricula are good. Morons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Omg don’t blame the curriculum a whole district buys and says teachers have to use on the teachers. How much say do you have over how your leadership tells you to do elements of your job?
It’s interesting that you (teachers) can band together for so many things, like keeping schools shut down, but when it comes to what you teach, you don’t have a voice. OhhhhhhK.
The problem is, enough teachers think that current methods and curricula are good. Morons.
You are clueless and an a-hole. Not a good combination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Omg don’t blame the curriculum a whole district buys and says teachers have to use on the teachers. How much say do you have over how your leadership tells you to do elements of your job?
It’s interesting that you (teachers) can band together for so many things, like keeping schools shut down, but when it comes to what you teach, you don’t have a voice. OhhhhhhK.
The problem is, enough teachers think that current methods and curricula are good. Morons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Omg don’t blame the curriculum a whole district buys and says teachers have to use on the teachers. How much say do you have over how your leadership tells you to do elements of your job?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Omg don’t blame the curriculum a whole district buys and says teachers have to use on the teachers. How much say do you have over how your leadership tells you to do elements of your job?
Anonymous wrote:I keep asking - who makes the curriculum decisions? Is it at the principal or district level?
And now the Calkins is getting lots of negative attention from parents who are seeing the lack of instruction first hand, her organization is talking about “rebalancing”. They have been denying the science of reading for years. This is just a craven attempt to keep market share.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Every teacher and school administrator should read this book. I doubt many of them have.
It’s basically an opinion piece. All of my kids learned to read by me via whole language. All were reading at a 3rd grade level upon entering K. Head sprout (if it’s still around) was also part of my mom curriculum. Re phonics - You are teaching kids to read laugh and write it as laf. Why would anyone want their child to learn phonics in K? I still remember the K teacher “correcting” my DCs spelling/phonics test. Laugh was marked wrong and corrected as Laf. School was Skool. My poor DC came home crying. I had to schedule a conference and explain that DC DRA was a 36 and to stop teaching DC phonics.
That's not how I was taught phonics . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My APS ES kid has phonics instruction every day. I'm not sure about in K because it was just a "language arts" block, but in 1st had both phonemic awareness and phonics, and in 2nd phonics. DC is a strong reader so admittedly haven't paid much attention, but now I'm curious if it's not really phonics, or if there are differences between schools?
It varies with the school. Most APS schools choose Calkin but there are a few that don’t.
Mi thought all of APS switched. We are at nottingham and they are using Orrin Gilligham this year thank goodness. Mynolder kids has one heck of a time leading to read, and one is still struggling.
Anonymous wrote:I keep asking - who makes the curriculum decisions? Is it at the principal or district level?
And now the Calkins is getting lots of negative attention from parents who are seeing the lack of instruction first hand, her organization is talking about “rebalancing”. They have been denying the science of reading for years. This is just a craven attempt to keep market share.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Every teacher and school administrator should read this book. I doubt many of them have.
It’s basically an opinion piece. All of my kids learned to read by me via whole language. All were reading at a 3rd grade level upon entering K. Head sprout (if it’s still around) was also part of my mom curriculum. Re phonics - You are teaching kids to read laugh and write it as laf. Why would anyone want their child to learn phonics in K? I still remember the K teacher “correcting” my DCs spelling/phonics test. Laugh was marked wrong and corrected as Laf. School was Skool. My poor DC came home crying. I had to schedule a conference and explain that DC DRA was a 36 and to stop teaching DC phonics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Every teacher and school administrator should read this book. I doubt many of them have.
It’s basically an opinion piece. All of my kids learned to read by me via whole language. All were reading at a 3rd grade level upon entering K. Head sprout (if it’s still around) was also part of my mom curriculum. Re phonics - You are teaching kids to read laugh and write it as laf. Why would anyone want their child to learn phonics in K? I still remember the K teacher “correcting” my DCs spelling/phonics test. Laugh was marked wrong and corrected as Laf. School was Skool. My poor DC came home crying. I had to schedule a conference and explain that DC DRA was a 36 and to stop teaching DC phonics.
That's not how I was taught phonics . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Every teacher and school administrator should read this book. I doubt many of them have.
It’s basically an opinion piece. All of my kids learned to read by me via whole language. All were reading at a 3rd grade level upon entering K. Head sprout (if it’s still around) was also part of my mom curriculum. Re phonics - You are teaching kids to read laugh and write it as laf. Why would anyone want their child to learn phonics in K? I still remember the K teacher “correcting” my DCs spelling/phonics test. Laugh was marked wrong and corrected as Laf. School was Skool. My poor DC came home crying. I had to schedule a conference and explain that DC DRA was a 36 and to stop teaching DC phonics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please read “The Knowledge Gap” by Natalie Wexler. Lucy Calkins is HORRIBLE. I can’t believe teachers go along with this.
Every teacher and school administrator should read this book. I doubt many of them have.
It’s basically an opinion piece. All of my kids learned to read by me via whole language. All were reading at a 3rd grade level upon entering K. Head sprout (if it’s still around) was also part of my mom curriculum. Re phonics - You are teaching kids to read laugh and write it as laf. Why would anyone want their child to learn phonics in K? I still remember the K teacher “correcting” my DCs spelling/phonics test. Laugh was marked wrong and corrected as Laf. School was Skool. My poor DC came home crying. I had to schedule a conference and explain that DC DRA was a 36 and to stop teaching DC phonics.