Anonymous wrote:Lack of political will and continued ability to make mothers and poor people bear the burderns, and a culture that does not actually care about children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But who says that hybrid means a teacher needs to teach a virtual and in-person simultaneously? Why are you assuming that's the case? Because it's convenient for your case?
Because that's how it's laid out. What would you have the kids do the other 2 days a week ?
asynchronous work. it’s not that hard to figure out!
It amounts to part time school. And complete full time child minding for the smaller kids.
I mean, that’s effectively what we have now with DL. The amount of direct instruction minutes is part time; the balance of the work is asynchronous. kids going to school “part time” and then doing the rest of the work asynchronously (or let’s just call it “homework”) is better.
But your kids are learning new things every day and they check in with their teachers through live instruction every day. I think parents are happier to have their kid occupied daily rather than have 3 full days a week where they must organize and provide all the supervision. What you are suggesting means the teacher has to repeat the same lesson twice -- meaning the kids by definition are learning less.
This parent is NOT happier this way. Especially for my PK kid who is "occupied" by a live teacher a whopping 30 minutes per day.
Would LOVE to have 2 full days in person for him. Even my other kid can definitely do better with 2 days in person, and asynchronous assignments to complete the other 3 days. This is what we do on Wednesdays already.
Stop trying to speak for "most" parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the hybrid model is a joke for everyone. 2 days on 3 days off? School every Other week? nothing on the off days- sounds dreamy.
I have friend out of the area whose elementary school kids are in hybrid format 5 days a week, in am/pm format. No one eats lunch at school. Specials are all virtual and the time spent at school is on ela and math. Why can’t we do do that?
This sounds exactly right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because the hybrid model is a joke for everyone. 2 days on 3 days off? School every Other week? nothing on the off days- sounds dreamy.
I have friend out of the area whose elementary school kids are in hybrid format 5 days a week, in am/pm format. No one eats lunch at school. Specials are all virtual and the time spent at school is on ela and math. Why can’t we do do that?
Anonymous wrote:Make no mistake - this is about Bowser and her political aspirations.
She is vying for a spot in Kamala’s administration. After the election, Bowser will reconsider her metrics and everyone will thank her for opening schools.
The DC Covid update today shows pretty good numbers. Kids being put first is not going to spike death rate in D.C. it’s just not.
What is the reason that nobody ever holds Bowser accountable?
Anonymous wrote:Because the hybrid model is a joke for everyone. 2 days on 3 days off? School every Other week? nothing on the off days- sounds dreamy.
Anonymous wrote:Hybrid is not logistically feasible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But who says that hybrid means a teacher needs to teach a virtual and in-person simultaneously? Why are you assuming that's the case? Because it's convenient for your case?
Because that's how it's laid out. What would you have the kids do the other 2 days a week ?
asynchronous work. it’s not that hard to figure out!
It amounts to part time school. And complete full time child minding for the smaller kids.
I mean, that’s effectively what we have now with DL. The amount of direct instruction minutes is part time; the balance of the work is asynchronous. kids going to school “part time” and then doing the rest of the work asynchronously (or let’s just call it “homework”) is better.
But your kids are learning new things every day and they check in with their teachers through live instruction every day. I think parents are happier to have their kid occupied daily rather than have 3 full days a week where they must organize and provide all the supervision. What you are suggesting means the teacher has to repeat the same lesson twice -- meaning the kids by definition are learning less.
This parent is NOT happier this way. Especially for my PK kid who is "occupied" by a live teacher a whopping 30 minutes per day.
Would LOVE to have 2 full days in person for him. Even my other kid can definitely do better with 2 days in person, and asynchronous assignments to complete the other 3 days. This is what we do on Wednesdays already.
Stop trying to speak for "most" parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But who says that hybrid means a teacher needs to teach a virtual and in-person simultaneously? Why are you assuming that's the case? Because it's convenient for your case?
Because that's how it's laid out. What would you have the kids do the other 2 days a week ?
asynchronous work. it’s not that hard to figure out!
It amounts to part time school. And complete full time child minding for the smaller kids.
I mean, that’s effectively what we have now with DL. The amount of direct instruction minutes is part time; the balance of the work is asynchronous. kids going to school “part time” and then doing the rest of the work asynchronously (or let’s just call it “homework”) is better.
But your kids are learning new things every day and they check in with their teachers through live instruction every day. I think parents are happier to have their kid occupied daily rather than have 3 full days a week where they must organize and provide all the supervision. What you are suggesting means the teacher has to repeat the same lesson twice -- meaning the kids by definition are learning less.
Anonymous wrote:Lack of political will and continued ability to make mothers and poor people bear the burderns, and a culture that does not actually care about children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the reason is the teachers union. they want to shutter schools until everyone is vaccinated, and bowser doesn't want to fight with the teachers union.
If that were true, non-unionized charters would be reopening.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sigh....
We can make schools better and safer but that won't change the health conditions of people.
The government isn't going to suddenly ban fast food and force people to move more. If we are being honest most disease is from poor eating and lack of movement. Obesity is also a factor in being more susceptible.
If you actually look at trends in places re-opening you'll notice their obesity rates are much lower as well as their rates of people with comorbidities.
So, it's easier to just say teachers are babies than really examine why we could possible be in this situation. Germany's obesity rate is about 22% Average being 26 (which isn't obese by US standards) The average for DC is 50% YES, you read correctly FIFTY PERCENT. AND in ward 7 and 8 is 75%!!!
This is not a joke.
https://dchealth.dc.gov/service/obesity-overview
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world...ctbook/rankorder/2228rank.html (older but I wanted to use a gov agency)
so no school until we fix the obesity epidemic. way to move the goalposts allll the way into another dimension!