Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the winter break and before VA team play the Carolinas, is the season as you expected? Will be very interesting to see how the league moves around after a couple weekends of Carolinas v. Virginia. Carolina teams fared well in the SC ECNL national event.... gonna be sweet winter/spring season.
VA teams standings in the MA conf (#1-#5):
U13: RU, VDA, Loudoun, McLean, BRYC
U14: Loudoun, McLean, RU, VDA, BRYC
U15: VDA, RU, McLean, BRYC, Loudoun
U16: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U17: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U18: McLean, BRYC, RU, VDA, Loudoun
Avg:
RU: 1.83
McLean: 2.33
VDA: 3.16
Loudoun: 3.33
BRYC: 4.33
McLean on a downward diagonal trend. Interesting
No S Sherlock. It's been that way for years, McLean teams get better with age. #dosomeresearch
Why is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the winter break and before VA team play the Carolinas, is the season as you expected? Will be very interesting to see how the league moves around after a couple weekends of Carolinas v. Virginia. Carolina teams fared well in the SC ECNL national event.... gonna be sweet winter/spring season.
VA teams standings in the MA conf (#1-#5):
U13: RU, VDA, Loudoun, McLean, BRYC
U14: Loudoun, McLean, RU, VDA, BRYC
U15: VDA, RU, McLean, BRYC, Loudoun
U16: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U17: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U18: McLean, BRYC, RU, VDA, Loudoun
Avg:
RU: 1.83
McLean: 2.33
VDA: 3.16
Loudoun: 3.33
BRYC: 4.33
McLean on a downward diagonal trend. Interesting
No S Sherlock. It's been that way for years, McLean teams get better with age. #dosomeresearch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the winter break and before VA team play the Carolinas, is the season as you expected? Will be very interesting to see how the league moves around after a couple weekends of Carolinas v. Virginia. Carolina teams fared well in the SC ECNL national event.... gonna be sweet winter/spring season.
VA teams standings in the MA conf (#1-#5):
U13: RU, VDA, Loudoun, McLean, BRYC
U14: Loudoun, McLean, RU, VDA, BRYC
U15: VDA, RU, McLean, BRYC, Loudoun
U16: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U17: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U18: McLean, BRYC, RU, VDA, Loudoun
Avg:
RU: 1.83
McLean: 2.33
VDA: 3.16
Loudoun: 3.33
BRYC: 4.33
McLean on a downward diagonal trend. Interesting
No S Sherlock. It's been that way for years, McLean teams get better with age. #dosomeresearch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the winter break and before VA team play the Carolinas, is the season as you expected? Will be very interesting to see how the league moves around after a couple weekends of Carolinas v. Virginia. Carolina teams fared well in the SC ECNL national event.... gonna be sweet winter/spring season.
VA teams standings in the MA conf (#1-#5):
U13: RU, VDA, Loudoun, McLean, BRYC
U14: Loudoun, McLean, RU, VDA, BRYC
U15: VDA, RU, McLean, BRYC, Loudoun
U16: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U17: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U18: McLean, BRYC, RU, VDA, Loudoun
Avg:
RU: 1.83
McLean: 2.33
VDA: 3.16
Loudoun: 3.33
BRYC: 4.33
McLean on a downward diagonal trend. Interesting
Anonymous wrote:At the winter break and before VA team play the Carolinas, is the season as you expected? Will be very interesting to see how the league moves around after a couple weekends of Carolinas v. Virginia. Carolina teams fared well in the SC ECNL national event.... gonna be sweet winter/spring season.
VA teams standings in the MA conf (#1-#5):
U13: RU, VDA, Loudoun, McLean, BRYC
U14: Loudoun, McLean, RU, VDA, BRYC
U15: VDA, RU, McLean, BRYC, Loudoun
U16: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U17: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U18: McLean, BRYC, RU, VDA, Loudoun
Avg:
RU: 1.83
McLean: 2.33
VDA: 3.16
Loudoun: 3.33
BRYC: 4.33
Anonymous wrote:At the winter break and before VA team play the Carolinas, is the season as you expected? Will be very interesting to see how the league moves around after a couple weekends of Carolinas v. Virginia. Carolina teams fared well in the SC ECNL national event.... gonna be sweet winter/spring season.
VA teams standings in the MA conf (#1-#5):
U13: RU, VDA, Loudoun, McLean, BRYC
U14: Loudoun, McLean, RU, VDA, BRYC
U15: VDA, RU, McLean, BRYC, Loudoun
U16: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U17: RU, McLean, Loudoun, VDA, BRYC
U18: McLean, BRYC, RU, VDA, Loudoun
Avg:
RU: 1.83
McLean: 2.33
VDA: 3.16
Loudoun: 3.33
BRYC: 4.33
Anonymous wrote:^^Nah that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BRYC only win is from the U18/19 team. Next year they may not win a single game in any age group.
How is one team so good and everybody else so bad?
Because the girls who are U17 this year are the girls who dispersed to a bunch of teams when DA stood up. Pre-DA, to get recruited from a NOVA club, you played for FCV (ECNL), Mclean (ECNL), or BRYC (not ECNL). That first DA year, the younger girls flocked to the new DA teams and to the expanded ECNL teams while the older girls on already-established teams (03 and above) stayed put. I think it took BRYC another year to get admitted into ECNL, and by then the damage to their pipeline was done. The 04s and below who wanted “elite” had more options in either ECNL or DA at Mclean/FCV/VDA/Spirit (pre-Metro) etc.
Awesomely wrong analysis
Please share what you think happened? That info above seems to be more or less the running story with the wait until u16/u17 when it all comes together component.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BRYC only win is from the U18/19 team. Next year they may not win a single game in any age group.
How is one team so good and everybody else so bad?
Because the girls who are U17 this year are the girls who dispersed to a bunch of teams when DA stood up. Pre-DA, to get recruited from a NOVA club, you played for FCV (ECNL), Mclean (ECNL), or BRYC (not ECNL). That first DA year, the younger girls flocked to the new DA teams and to the expanded ECNL teams while the older girls on already-established teams (03 and above) stayed put. I think it took BRYC another year to get admitted into ECNL, and by then the damage to their pipeline was done. The 04s and below who wanted “elite” had more options in either ECNL or DA at Mclean/FCV/VDA/Spirit (pre-Metro) etc.
Awesomely wrong analysis
Please share what you think happened? That info above seems to be more or less the running story with the wait until u16/u17 when it all comes together component.
Nah.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BRYC only win is from the U18/19 team. Next year they may not win a single game in any age group.
How is one team so good and everybody else so bad?
Because the girls who are U17 this year are the girls who dispersed to a bunch of teams when DA stood up. Pre-DA, to get recruited from a NOVA club, you played for FCV (ECNL), Mclean (ECNL), or BRYC (not ECNL). That first DA year, the younger girls flocked to the new DA teams and to the expanded ECNL teams while the older girls on already-established teams (03 and above) stayed put. I think it took BRYC another year to get admitted into ECNL, and by then the damage to their pipeline was done. The 04s and below who wanted “elite” had more options in either ECNL or DA at Mclean/FCV/VDA/Spirit (pre-Metro) etc.
Awesomely wrong analysis
Please share what you think happened? That info above seems to be more or less the running story with the wait until u16/u17 when it all comes together component.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BRYC only win is from the U18/19 team. Next year they may not win a single game in any age group.
How is one team so good and everybody else so bad?
Because the girls who are U17 this year are the girls who dispersed to a bunch of teams when DA stood up. Pre-DA, to get recruited from a NOVA club, you played for FCV (ECNL), Mclean (ECNL), or BRYC (not ECNL). That first DA year, the younger girls flocked to the new DA teams and to the expanded ECNL teams while the older girls on already-established teams (03 and above) stayed put. I think it took BRYC another year to get admitted into ECNL, and by then the damage to their pipeline was done. The 04s and below who wanted “elite” had more options in either ECNL or DA at Mclean/FCV/VDA/Spirit (pre-Metro) etc.
Awesomely wrong analysis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprised to see Loudoun struggle like this. Such a large club with so many players. How does a club with 4 teams at most younger age group not develop higher level players?
FCV
+1
Top Loudoun players in the 06 and older age groups left for FCV (primarily) before Loudoun got ECNL. 07s and below don't have excuses.
Seems like based on results, the younger Loudoun teams don't need excuses.
3 teams out of about 100 gives you a rather measly percentage.
What exactly are you boasting about?