Anonymous wrote:I'm not buying the A scores boosters are posting. Come off it, DC schools are just too screwed up.
The honest parents are mostly those new to schools. They're left feeling confused by rave reviews up the chain.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not buying the A scores boosters are posting. Come off it, DC schools are just too screwed up.
The honest parents are mostly those new to schools. They're left feeling confused by rave reviews up the chain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis/5th/D-
Interesting. What are the issues? BASIS' DL approach is reputed to be kick ass.
I can see how it will (someday) be great. But 10 year olds who know no one, who are in classes of 45 kids, who have to navigate 9 subjects through teams with no consistency of organization at all with no help as to how to do it are not being set up to succeed.
Sorry, this arrangement sounds like a recipe for burnout and rebellion eventually, other than for a truly diligent kid.
Yes. And it's hard to know if your kid is even diligent without them being able to actually access the materials and the classes. I'm fascinated that parents from the upper grades seem very happy. That's great! But it also means they must do better with the 5th graders or they are going to wind up 1/2 the class leaving by 6th.
What else are the parents going to tell you? That they mind that the heads aren't much more than grad students, with few heads lasting even two years? That they care that at least a quarter of the teachers quit each spring, and most arrive with little experience. That it's fine by them that there's no library, gym or outdoor space? That they're concerned about chronically weak administrative capacity? That advanced work is really just done in math and science - STEM subjects is as stretch (not much in the way of T or E). That you can forget about advanced foreign languages or literature at BASIS.
No, most will defend BASIS to the hilt because the curriculum does offer far and away more rigor than DCPS, and BASIS is their best option to stay in their Capitol Hill row houses. Hint: they can't afford private school.
Is it necessary for them to say that? You’re here to remind everyone in each thread.
Anonymous wrote:LAMB / Rather not say / D-
Anonymous wrote:LAMB / Rather not say / D-
Anonymous wrote:LAMB. K. Solid C.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis/5th/D-
Interesting. What are the issues? BASIS' DL approach is reputed to be kick ass.
I can see how it will (someday) be great. But 10 year olds who know no one, who are in classes of 45 kids, who have to navigate 9 subjects through teams with no consistency of organization at all with no help as to how to do it are not being set up to succeed.
Sorry, this arrangement sounds like a recipe for burnout and rebellion eventually, other than for a truly diligent kid.
Yes. And it's hard to know if your kid is even diligent without them being able to actually access the materials and the classes. I'm fascinated that parents from the upper grades seem very happy. That's great! But it also means they must do better with the 5th graders or they are going to wind up 1/2 the class leaving by 6th.
What else are the parents going to tell you? That they mind that the heads aren't much more than grad students, with few heads lasting even two years? That they care that at least a quarter of the teachers quit each spring, and most arrive with little experience. That it's fine by them that there's no library, gym or outdoor space? That they're concerned about chronically weak administrative capacity? That advanced work is really just done in math and science - STEM subjects is as stretch (not much in the way of T or E). That you can forget about advanced foreign languages or literature at BASIS.
No, most will defend BASIS to the hilt because the curriculum does offer far and away more rigor than DCPS, and BASIS is their best option to stay in their Capitol Hill row houses. Hint: they can't afford private school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis/5th/D-
Interesting. What are the issues? BASIS' DL approach is reputed to be kick ass.
I can see how it will (someday) be great. But 10 year olds who know no one, who are in classes of 45 kids, who have to navigate 9 subjects through teams with no consistency of organization at all with no help as to how to do it are not being set up to succeed.
Sorry, this arrangement sounds like a recipe for burnout and rebellion eventually, other than for a truly diligent kid.
Yes. And it's hard to know if your kid is even diligent without them being able to actually access the materials and the classes. I'm fascinated that parents from the upper grades seem very happy. That's great! But it also means they must do better with the 5th graders or they are going to wind up 1/2 the class leaving by 6th.
Anonymous wrote:LAMB. K. Solid C.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis/5th/D-
Basis/5/A
Only a few bumps for us, but last week was great. whats been your issue? Maybe its element specific?
Basis 5th/A for us as well. (I’m on the google 5th grade listserve initiated by a parent and know some kids are struggling to figure out assignments and expectations, and are generally overwhelmed by Teams and the workload. But my kid seems extremely happy, is learning and is self-sufficient. Yes, there have been — and continue to be — some bumps. But overall an A.)
Have you actually looked too see what your kid has turned in?
Yes, I’ve looked at my kid’s work, to the extent I can access it after she hits submit Overall she seems to be doing a solid job, though I’ll obviously know more when we start to receive grades.
Given the emails from other parents expressing deep unhappiness and ongoing challenges, I periodically check in with my child asking how it’s going — including this morning when I was told once again all was good. The only thing I need to help with during the day is printing of the math homework PDF, which then needs to be scanned back and uploaded. So I currently spend a few minutes on most days assisting with that.
What I appreciate about the Basis curriculum is that it’s substantive and rigorous.
What is truly painful is listening through my DCPS elementary child’s curriculum, which is 90% a waste of time, full of nonsense social-emotional and community-building activities (eg., morning greetings that last 40 minutes), time-killers, and garbage political indoctrination disguised as “social studies.” The highlight of our DCPS year this far has been the iready test!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis/5th/D-
Interesting. What are the issues? BASIS' DL approach is reputed to be kick ass.
I can see how it will (someday) be great. But 10 year olds who know no one, who are in classes of 45 kids, who have to navigate 9 subjects through teams with no consistency of organization at all with no help as to how to do it are not being set up to succeed.
Sorry, this arrangement sounds like a recipe for burnout and rebellion eventually, other than for a truly diligent kid.