Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just read what Mac Love posted. Among other things, in response to news about a transgender person prevailing in a court case for equal access, he said "Sick."

I'm the parent of a transgender young adult. My child is not "sick." Mac Love is sick.

I'm glad he's been fired. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

I beg to differ.

Anonymous wrote:I just read what Mac Love posted. Among other things, in response to news about a transgender person prevailing in a court case for equal access, he said "Sick."

I'm the parent of a transgender young adult. My child is not "sick." Mac Love is sick.

I'm glad he's been fired. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

He committed other felonies besides the curfew issue and yes the law states you can’t declare self defense while committing a crime.

You think somebody that breaks into your house, you attack them... they can kill you and declare self defense?

No one broke into anyone's home. The streets belong to the public. Violating curfew isn't a felony. I'm either arguing with a retard (also, see inability to master simple formatting) or a 12 year old. If I'm carrying a rifle down King Street tonight and some idiot attacks me with blunt instrument and I shoot and kill him I have committed no crime. Same with Kyle. He was only charged to appease the masses while all this percolates. No way does he see time.

Wrong!!!!

He didn’t attack you with a gun, dummy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have any of you kept up with this? Criminal complaint is now public. Rittenhouse was drawn and fired on first.

That changes everything.

First, I think he has an extremely strong self defense case and likely won’t do hard time.

Second, he chose to take an automatic weapon into civil unrest. The fact he was fired upon certainly does not change “everything.”

It absolutely does. He was in legitimate fear for his life. Someone was trying to kill him.

And what was he doing in the streets with a gun after curfew, hunting wabbit?

You think he forfeited his right to self defense because he was violating curfew?

He committed other felonies besides the curfew issue and yes the law states you can’t declare self defense while committing a crime.

You think somebody that breaks into your house, you attack them... they can kill you and declare self defense?

No one broke into anyone's home. The streets belong to the public. Violating curfew isn't a felony. I'm either arguing with a retard (also, see inability to master simple formatting) or a 12 year old. If I'm carrying a rifle down King Street tonight and some idiot attacks me with blunt instrument and I shoot and kill him I have committed no crime. Same with Kyle. He was only charged to appease the masses while all this percolates. No way does he see time.