Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Well, they have to justify the price they pay somehow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You used “they” throughout, I assume to disguise your child’s sex. But it matters in that a boy will have a substantially better shot at Amherst than a girl with the same stats. Apply anyway, intellectual and good writer could help.
Weird statement. Source?
Undeniably true
Anonymous wrote:If it’s equestrian, look at Mt Holyoke up the road as a safety. Beautiful barn in walking distance to campus.
Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Haven’t you heard, the schools where parents literally have no power over teachers give everyone As while the schools where parents cut very large checks curve to a C+
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Yes. Most definitely. There’s no curve inflation. Classes are harder and a lot more work. Average grades at our private is probably a 3.5. Top half of class or greater either gets into top 20 schools.
Anonymous wrote:I have to say as well, I don't have the context of your child's extracurricular, but I struggle to think of one that isn't attractive to colleges if sold in the right way (especially if your child is genuinely passionate about it). Universities have become very suspicious (and rightfully so) of having a glut of extracurriculars (implying that the student isn't really serious about any of them) or of having 'paid for' extracurriculars (essentially those that only the wealthiest can afford).
Op here again. Thank you for all your responses, the different perspectives are quite helpful. DD has an extracurricular that she has been involved in for over a decade, but is a prohibitively expensive one, which is why I think it is unattractive for admission. The extracurricular is not a varsity sport at Amherst, but there is a club.
Equestrian? If you apply, she'll either get in or not. It's one or the other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Yes. Most definitely. There’s no curve inflation. Classes are harder and a lot more work. Average grades at our private is probably a 3.5. Top half of class or greater either gets into top 20 schools.
I have to say as well, I don't have the context of your child's extracurricular, but I struggle to think of one that isn't attractive to colleges if sold in the right way (especially if your child is genuinely passionate about it). Universities have become very suspicious (and rightfully so) of having a glut of extracurriculars (implying that the student isn't really serious about any of them) or of having 'paid for' extracurriculars (essentially those that only the wealthiest can afford).
Op here again. Thank you for all your responses, the different perspectives are quite helpful. DD has an extracurricular that she has been involved in for over a decade, but is a prohibitively expensive one, which is why I think it is unattractive for admission. The extracurricular is not a varsity sport at Amherst, but there is a club.
Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Haven’t you heard, the schools where parents literally have no power over teachers give everyone As while the schools where parents cut very large checks curve to a C+
No, I haven’t heard why a 36 ACT from one school should be valued over a 36 ACT from another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Haven’t you heard, the schools where parents literally have no power over teachers give everyone As while the schools where parents cut very large checks curve to a C+
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You used “they” throughout, I assume to disguise your child’s sex. But it matters in that a boy will have a substantially better shot at Amherst than a girl with the same stats. Apply anyway, intellectual and good writer could help.
Weird statement. Source?