Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents and teachers:
Let's go ahead and say that school will be virtual next year. Does anybody have any idea how many hours a day the kids will be expected to "be at school"?
My kids will be in PK3 and K..and just trying to figure out/think about a possible schedule.
TIA
There will not be DL for preK
Anonymous wrote:Parents and teachers:
Let's go ahead and say that school will be virtual next year. Does anybody have any idea how many hours a day the kids will be expected to "be at school"?
My kids will be in PK3 and K..and just trying to figure out/think about a possible schedule.
TIA
Anonymous wrote:Another DCPS teacher here. My school had zero requirements. There were teachers teaching 2-3 hours a day and others who did no live lessons whatsoever. Some of those teachers also did no videos or any real form of teaching outside of contacting parents. This is one of the reasons some parents are leery of distance learning. As a school district, we need to assure parents that things will be better since we have more knowledge now, and some people are better equipped to emotionally deal with the health crisis. Also, those teachers that didn't teach before because they had young kids to take care of should consider taking a leave of absence if they're unable to find childcare.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a DCPS teacher, and I don't have any inside information on the schedule, but from conversations with my colleagues I think we are all planning to do more and require more from students than we did in the spring. For example, in the spring I had live sessions 2-3 times per week, and in the fall they will be 4-5 times per week. In addition, I am planning to pull more small groups and do more individual meetings than I did in the spring. I am expecting that the experience for students will be significantly more robust.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the elementary level, I have heard there will be 2 days a week with live instruction and 1 day a week for small groups. Depending on grade level, it can be up to 3 hours of instruction on live instruction day. Breaks will be built into the learning.
so distance learning will only be for 3 days per week? WTF. So my kids will have no more than 9 hours per week of instruction whereas before it was 20+?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It better be more than last time. We got less than two hours of live teaching a week.
Our school had two, 25-min live sessions per week. Insane. It all fell to the parents. We’ve already been engaging the chancellor’s office to make sure our principal doesn’t pull this stunt again.
Was this Hearst?
I’m a NP, my kids go to Hearst and this sounds like what they got! It was really horrific and better not happen again.
At our DCPS elementary school, we had NO live teaching. AT ALL.
Anonymous wrote:At the elementary level, I have heard there will be 2 days a week with live instruction and 1 day a week for small groups. Depending on grade level, it can be up to 3 hours of instruction on live instruction day. Breaks will be built into the learning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It better be more than last time. We got less than two hours of live teaching a week.
Our school had two, 25-min live sessions per week. Insane. It all fell to the parents. We’ve already been engaging the chancellor’s office to make sure our principal doesn’t pull this stunt again.
Was this Hearst?
I’m a NP, my kids go to Hearst and this sounds like what they got! It was really horrific and better not happen again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Hearst parent here. Our kids got 1 hour total of teacher instruction per week in the spring. And yes, I blame it on the principal. Lack of leadership or outright telling teachers not to provide instruction. Not sure which but either way, I blame her.
But why not look to the district... that offered zero guidance so each school just made it up?
DCPS planning is like Trumps federal response to the pandemic... non existent.
So DCPS leadership is definitely to blame, however you also have to blame school leadership.
My school required at least 30 minutes live a day and 3 recorded lessons a week, which is definitely not enough and most teachers went way beyond that. Even if they couldn’t teach new material (district orders)
I’m sure other leadership at other schools did even better. School leadership 100% matters in this case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our charter school already announced next year’s schedule. It’s almost exactly the same hours as normal: 8:45 to 3-something. I really like how they’ve divvied up the hours. This is a middle school, and they’re doing 30 mins synchronous learning/45 mins asynchronous/15 minute break, three times a day. Plus lunch. That’s three classes per day. The next day, they do the same schedule but with the other three classes. Teachers are available for an hour after school each day for individual help.
I think this is a great plan. They can keep the same schedule whether school or individual kids are is in-person or virtual.
Anonymous wrote:Our charter school already announced next year’s schedule. It’s almost exactly the same hours as normal: 8:45 to 3-something. I really like how they’ve divvied up the hours. This is a middle school, and they’re doing 30 mins synchronous learning/45 mins asynchronous/15 minute break, three times a day. Plus lunch. That’s three classes per day. The next day, they do the same schedule but with the other three classes. Teachers are available for an hour after school each day for individual help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another Hearst parent here. Our kids got 1 hour total of teacher instruction per week in the spring. And yes, I blame it on the principal. Lack of leadership or outright telling teachers not to provide instruction. Not sure which but either way, I blame her.
But why not look to the district... that offered zero guidance so each school just made it up?
DCPS planning is like Trumps federal response to the pandemic... non existent.