Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 15-year-old girl in Baltimore died from Covid. She definitely was high risk, but you can't say "0 deaths ages 0-17."
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/15-year-old-in-maryland-dies-from-coronavirus/2306892/
What is the point of posting this? It’s sad, but what does it mean?
PP, if you’re uncomfortable sending your child to aftercare, then don’t. Why are you worried about what other parents do?
Not that PP, but how about: Because repeated false information of “no deaths” is not the truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
+1. My kids don't need it but good for Bar-T and the other providers for coming up with solutions. I do think MCPS or the state needs to pay part of the costs so it can be affordable to families
This is already being done. There are childcare subsidies available for lower income families.
There is going to be a massive increase in requests for subsidies and I don't know where the funding will come from. Subsidies were already very underfunded.
I definitely agree with folks that it's great these providers are creating options for families that need child care, but have huge concerns about MCPS essentially allowing private companies to charge for children to go to public school.
As one of the parents who hopes to send her kid, this is not public school. It's childcare. I don't consider DL public school. We're going to identify specific learning objectives for our kids, separate from the MCPS curriculum, and supplement to meet those goals. That's the best I think we can hope for from this year, particularly with elementary-aged kids. DL is, frankly, a way for school systems to provide the illusion of offering real education so that they can maintain their funding. I'm not saying it's not the least bad option, but it is not public school.
I agree it's not the same as in-person schooling. It does mean people who can pay can have a dedicated adult to help their children learn using space in public schools, and people who can't pay won't.
Right, although a lot of parents are already advocating for subsidies, and I think the companies will do their best to accommodate parents who can't afford full freight.
It may not necessarily be at schools, either; KAH said they've identified 11 other potential sites, in case the schools don't work out. Which is great, because working families need childcare, in some form or another, and it should be as accessible as possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
+1. My kids don't need it but good for Bar-T and the other providers for coming up with solutions. I do think MCPS or the state needs to pay part of the costs so it can be affordable to families
This is already being done. There are childcare subsidies available for lower income families.
There is going to be a massive increase in requests for subsidies and I don't know where the funding will come from. Subsidies were already very underfunded.
I definitely agree with folks that it's great these providers are creating options for families that need child care, but have huge concerns about MCPS essentially allowing private companies to charge for children to go to public school.
As one of the parents who hopes to send her kid, this is not public school. It's childcare. I don't consider DL public school. We're going to identify specific learning objectives for our kids, separate from the MCPS curriculum, and supplement to meet those goals. That's the best I think we can hope for from this year, particularly with elementary-aged kids. DL is, frankly, a way for school systems to provide the illusion of offering real education so that they can maintain their funding. I'm not saying it's not the least bad option, but it is not public school.
I agree it's not the same as in-person schooling. It does mean people who can pay can have a dedicated adult to help their children learn using space in public schools, and people who can't pay won't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
+1. My kids don't need it but good for Bar-T and the other providers for coming up with solutions. I do think MCPS or the state needs to pay part of the costs so it can be affordable to families
This is already being done. There are childcare subsidies available for lower income families.
There is going to be a massive increase in requests for subsidies and I don't know where the funding will come from. Subsidies were already very underfunded.
I definitely agree with folks that it's great these providers are creating options for families that need child care, but have huge concerns about MCPS essentially allowing private companies to charge for children to go to public school.
As one of the parents who hopes to send her kid, this is not public school. It's childcare. I don't consider DL public school. We're going to identify specific learning objectives for our kids, separate from the MCPS curriculum, and supplement to meet those goals. That's the best I think we can hope for from this year, particularly with elementary-aged kids. DL is, frankly, a way for school systems to provide the illusion of offering real education so that they can maintain their funding. I'm not saying it's not the least bad option, but it is not public school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
+1. My kids don't need it but good for Bar-T and the other providers for coming up with solutions. I do think MCPS or the state needs to pay part of the costs so it can be affordable to families
This is already being done. There are childcare subsidies available for lower income families.
There is going to be a massive increase in requests for subsidies and I don't know where the funding will come from. Subsidies were already very underfunded.
I definitely agree with folks that it's great these providers are creating options for families that need child care, but have huge concerns about MCPS essentially allowing private companies to charge for children to go to public school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
+1. My kids don't need it but good for Bar-T and the other providers for coming up with solutions. I do think MCPS or the state needs to pay part of the costs so it can be affordable to families
This is already being done. There are childcare subsidies available for lower income families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 15-year-old girl in Baltimore died from Covid. She definitely was high risk, but you can't say "0 deaths ages 0-17."
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/15-year-old-in-maryland-dies-from-coronavirus/2306892/
What is the point of posting this? It’s sad, but what does it mean?
PP, if you’re uncomfortable sending your child to aftercare, then don’t. Why are you worried about what other parents do?
Anonymous wrote:A 15-year-old girl in Baltimore died from Covid. She definitely was high risk, but you can't say "0 deaths ages 0-17."
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/15-year-old-in-maryland-dies-from-coronavirus/2306892/
Anonymous wrote:A 15-year-old girl in Baltimore died from Covid. She definitely was high risk, but you can't say "0 deaths ages 0-17."
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/15-year-old-in-maryland-dies-from-coronavirus/2306892/
Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am impressed by the ingenuity of the private sector.
+1. My kids don't need it but good for Bar-T and the other providers for coming up with solutions. I do think MCPS or the state needs to pay part of the costs so it can be affordable to families