Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The math in this post alone invalidates it. We are not going to let every student and teacher get COVID, as is assumed here. That's complete nonsense and just made up to get an emotional eaction.
We should doing everything we can to keep infection rates low in the community (#schoolsbeforebars) and aggressively react to any outbreak. We should also take all proposed measure (masks/cohortings/distancing/handwashing/cleaning) to keep any infections as contained as possible.
Students who can effectively learn from home should strongly consider taking that option. For kids who can't, regardless of the reason, we should do all we can to make school as safe as we can.
If we have such power, why are we "letting" other people get it under conditions that aren't half as bad as what attending school will entail?
It's fair to assume that most, if not all, will get it.
Anonymous wrote:NP here, and to the immediate PP, I sincerely hope you’ve advocated and continue to advocate for the lives of grocery store clerks, nursing home residents and staff, prisoners, retail and warehouse workers....the list goes on and on. I work in a clinic and no one seems to care anymore about the risks my colleagues and I have taken, nor about what’s happening to our kids.
For the people saying “well if you have to send your kid then just send them” after saying “PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE!!!”—think about what you’re saying here! Because the PP’s kid has a disability, or because a kid has parents working in restaurants or hospitals, our kids get to be the guinea pigs for this plan? How incredibly cruel.
And yes, there is actual science to refute the OP’s cited numbers. Yes, he is incredibly privileged to have a choice, not that he acknowledges this at any time in his post. And yes, my kids and the kids of all the ICU and ER nurses and doctors I know are going back into the classroom this fall, because we don’t have an alternative and no one has cared to offer us one.
Anonymous wrote:NP here, and to the immediate PP, I sincerely hope you’ve advocated and continue to advocate for the lives of grocery store clerks, nursing home residents and staff, prisoners, retail and warehouse workers....the list goes on and on. I work in a clinic and no one seems to care anymore about the risks my colleagues and I have taken, nor about what’s happening to our kids.
For the people saying “well if you have to send your kid then just send them” after saying “PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE!!!”—think about what you’re saying here! Because the PP’s kid has a disability, or because a kid has parents working in restaurants or hospitals, our kids get to be the guinea pigs for this plan? How incredibly cruel.
And yes, there is actual science to refute the OP’s cited numbers. Yes, he is incredibly privileged to have a choice, not that he acknowledges this at any time in his post. And yes, my kids and the kids of all the ICU and ER nurses and doctors I know are going back into the classroom this fall, because we don’t have an alternative and no one has cared to offer us one.
Anonymous wrote:Whoever wrote this should have reread it before posting. A lot of it is just totally wrong. And he comes off as self-righteous.
Can people who want DL just choose DL and stop feeling the need to force other people into it just so their kids aren’t left out of something? These over the top-long winded posts are getting out of hand.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you for this OP
Ok the math is wrong, but it doesn’t negate the rest of the thoughts in the post.
People keep picking one detail and then change the tenor of the conversation... wonder where they got that strategy from?
*most OR allAnonymous wrote:You think most of all students and teachers will get COVID with the hybrid option? Wow.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The math in this post alone invalidates it. We are not going to let every student and teacher get COVID, as is assumed here. That's complete nonsense and just made up to get an emotional eaction.
We should doing everything we can to keep infection rates low in the community (#schoolsbeforebars) and aggressively react to any outbreak. We should also take all proposed measure (masks/cohortings/distancing/handwashing/cleaning) to keep any infections as contained as possible.
Students who can effectively learn from home should strongly consider taking that option. For kids who can't, regardless of the reason, we should do all we can to make school as safe as we can.
If we have such power, why are we "letting" other people get it under conditions that aren't half as bad as what attending school will entail?
It's fair to assume that most, if not all, will get it.
You think most of all students and teachers will get COVID with the hybrid option? Wow.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The math in this post alone invalidates it. We are not going to let every student and teacher get COVID, as is assumed here. That's complete nonsense and just made up to get an emotional eaction.
We should doing everything we can to keep infection rates low in the community (#schoolsbeforebars) and aggressively react to any outbreak. We should also take all proposed measure (masks/cohortings/distancing/handwashing/cleaning) to keep any infections as contained as possible.
Students who can effectively learn from home should strongly consider taking that option. For kids who can't, regardless of the reason, we should do all we can to make school as safe as we can.
If we have such power, why are we "letting" other people get it under conditions that aren't half as bad as what attending school will entail?
It's fair to assume that most, if not all, will get it.