Anonymous wrote:Op here
How about this one?
https://www.neimanmarcus.com/p/rickie-freeman-for-teri-jon-sleeveless-chiffon-polka-dot-pintuck-dress-prod230280058?childItemId=NMT0PFD_
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://shop.nordstrom.com/s/dress-the-population-dana-wrap-waist-cocktail-dress-regular-plus-size/5378059?origin=category-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home%2FWomen%2FClothing%2FDresses&color=burgundy
Maybe this?
The dress is pretty but I think a bit too plain for a wedding?
Could be. May let accessories shine and likely useful after the wedding. Might be good to know more about your style (classic, minimalist, boho, etc). I tend to like simple things but that may not be right for you.
I am usually classic, but sometimes can wear some boho.
I think I would like more classic dress for a wedding, with a print, or some bright color, with interesting detail or two)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this without the jacket?
https://www.jjshouse.com/Sheath-Column-V-Neck-Knee-Length-Lace-Mother-Of-The-Bride-Dress-With-Beading-Sequins-008179224-g179224/?utm_term=179224&utm_size=06&ggsub=pl&ggntk=g&ggcid=278890379977&ggkey=&ggpos=&ggdev=c&ggdevm=&ggplm=&ggtgt=&gclid=CjwKCAjw2a32BRBXEiwAUcugiDugOQNDYpPsxaMKrt5JTEm_s6fNNGT5e8cakE0nns4qRmARuJBTIhoComcQAvD_BwE
Love this one.
But what is it on the bottom? Looks like it was hemmed.
I can't tell. It looks like the inside shell and the perhaps organza overlay are folded under at the bottom, and probably tacked inside so that there is no seam.
Or I should say no seam at the hem.
And for October upstate I would definitely ditch the little jacket and add a lightweight cashmere shawl.
Anonymous wrote:The first link is beyond hideous.
The second link is fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this without the jacket?
https://www.jjshouse.com/Sheath-Column-V-Neck-Knee-Length-Lace-Mother-Of-The-Bride-Dress-With-Beading-Sequins-008179224-g179224/?utm_term=179224&utm_size=06&ggsub=pl&ggntk=g&ggcid=278890379977&ggkey=&ggpos=&ggdev=c&ggdevm=&ggplm=&ggtgt=&gclid=CjwKCAjw2a32BRBXEiwAUcugiDugOQNDYpPsxaMKrt5JTEm_s6fNNGT5e8cakE0nns4qRmARuJBTIhoComcQAvD_BwE
Love this one.
But what is it on the bottom? Looks like it was hemmed.
I can't tell. It looks like the inside shell and the perhaps organza overlay are folded under at the bottom, and probably tacked inside so that there is no seam.
Or I should say no seam at the hem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this without the jacket?
https://www.jjshouse.com/Sheath-Column-V-Neck-Knee-Length-Lace-Mother-Of-The-Bride-Dress-With-Beading-Sequins-008179224-g179224/?utm_term=179224&utm_size=06&ggsub=pl&ggntk=g&ggcid=278890379977&ggkey=&ggpos=&ggdev=c&ggdevm=&ggplm=&ggtgt=&gclid=CjwKCAjw2a32BRBXEiwAUcugiDugOQNDYpPsxaMKrt5JTEm_s6fNNGT5e8cakE0nns4qRmARuJBTIhoComcQAvD_BwE
Love this one.
But what is it on the bottom? Looks like it was hemmed.
I can't tell. It looks like the inside shell and the perhaps organza overlay are folded under at the bottom, and probably tacked inside so that there is no seam.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How about this without the jacket?
https://www.jjshouse.com/Sheath-Column-V-Neck-Knee-Length-Lace-Mother-Of-The-Bride-Dress-With-Beading-Sequins-008179224-g179224/?utm_term=179224&utm_size=06&ggsub=pl&ggntk=g&ggcid=278890379977&ggkey=&ggpos=&ggdev=c&ggdevm=&ggplm=&ggtgt=&gclid=CjwKCAjw2a32BRBXEiwAUcugiDugOQNDYpPsxaMKrt5JTEm_s6fNNGT5e8cakE0nns4qRmARuJBTIhoComcQAvD_BwE
Love this one.
But what is it on the bottom? Looks like it was hemmed.
Anonymous wrote:How about this without the jacket?
https://www.jjshouse.com/Sheath-Column-V-Neck-Knee-Length-Lace-Mother-Of-The-Bride-Dress-With-Beading-Sequins-008179224-g179224/?utm_term=179224&utm_size=06&ggsub=pl&ggntk=g&ggcid=278890379977&ggkey=&ggpos=&ggdev=c&ggdevm=&ggplm=&ggtgt=&gclid=CjwKCAjw2a32BRBXEiwAUcugiDugOQNDYpPsxaMKrt5JTEm_s6fNNGT5e8cakE0nns4qRmARuJBTIhoComcQAvD_BwE
Anonymous wrote:The first link is beyond hideous.
The second link is fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love the first one. It’s hideous in the ivory, pretty in the other colors, and really, really pretty in the gray that you linked to. Funny how how much better or worse some colors are in that dress.
The second dress is fine but kind of generic.
Thank you![]()
So pleasant to read constructive feedback.
So awesome to read passive agressive feedback on the feedback you requested.
No one walked into your living room and told you that these dresses were ugly (they are). You came in here and asked for opinions. Opinion: the dresses you linked to are ugly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://shop.nordstrom.com/s/dress-the-population-dana-wrap-waist-cocktail-dress-regular-plus-size/5378059?origin=category-personalizedsort&breadcrumb=Home%2FWomen%2FClothing%2FDresses&color=burgundy
Maybe this?
The dress is pretty but I think a bit too plain for a wedding?
Could be. May let accessories shine and likely useful after the wedding. Might be good to know more about your style (classic, minimalist, boho, etc). I tend to like simple things but that may not be right for you.