Anonymous wrote:I love how parents are challenging teachers to come up with a solution as if the district has EVER factored our voices into any the decisions they’ve made thus far. Our own union rep had to fight to be on a reopening committee in which sat NO teachers or school professionals.
We are human capital to the district.
Even if we had a plan it wouldnt be the one the district would choose because then they’d have to admit we actually have brains and can think for ourselves as a collective teacher unit. So why bother wasting the energy hypothesizing some utopian outcome where everybody’s needs are equitably met? Won’t happen. Somebody’s getting screwed. Lube up in preparation for the May 22nd announcement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here. I imagine no one in their right mind will work as a sub. With no subs available, will a teacher who is sick feel the pressure to go into work so as not to let their colleagues down? Less teachers means more students in a class. Or more importantly, will teachers show up to school further risking the spread of the virus?
No one is talking about this. People are imagining that teachers won't get sick, subs will be plentiful.
I worked as a sub for younger kids at one school. I enjoy working with the kids, I like my colleagues a lot, and subbing works perfectly with my schedule. But I would not sub right now if schools opened up. The risks are not worth it to me. And especially not for the pay in this environment.
Anonymous wrote:NP. More complaints about being unappreciated, and yet no teacher actually is offering any solutions. You may be putting in tons of time, but it doesn't change the fact that the amount of education delivered is much less than a full day of in-class instruction. Across DCPS the students are mostly in varying degrees of falling behind where they would be expect to be at the end of this year and we have no real data on how much they are suffering in other ways. So teachers just want to continue next year exactly as we are now? That's your proposal?
Anonymous wrote:NYC schools lost close to 80 people (staff and teachers) from Covid-related deaths. They did not heed warnings and kept schools open until March 22nd, way past the time other districts closed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here. I imagine no one in their right mind will work as a sub. With no subs available, will a teacher who is sick feel the pressure to go into work so as not to let their colleagues down? Less teachers means more students in a class. Or more importantly, will teachers show up to school further risking the spread of the virus?
No one is talking about this. People are imagining that teachers won't get sick, subs will be plentiful.
I worked as a sub for younger kids at one school. I enjoy working with the kids, I like my colleagues a lot, and subbing works perfectly with my schedule. But I would not sub right now if schools opened up. The risks are not worth it to me. And especially not for the pay in this environment.
Anonymous wrote:Teacher here. I imagine no one in their right mind will work as a sub. With no subs available, will a teacher who is sick feel the pressure to go into work so as not to let their colleagues down? Less teachers means more students in a class. Or more importantly, will teachers show up to school further risking the spread of the virus?
No one is talking about this. People are imagining that teachers won't get sick, subs will be plentiful.