Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Better then the conference that DA was in.![]()
LOL. Thank you for the laugh. Is that why VDA was bottom of the barrel in the DA and then moved to middle of the pack or better in a weak ECNL Mid Atlantic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Better then the conference that DA was in.![]()
LOL. Thank you for the laugh. Is that why VDA was bottom of the barrel in the DA and then moved to middle of the pack or better in a weak ECNL Mid Atlantic?
Not sure how VDA did for the one year they played, why do you? why do you care? and how do you know the stats of VDA from what 2-3 years ago? Seem's a little obsessed that people keep bringing up VDA when no one is actually talking about them. I do know however, based on seeing the crap teams in the DA in this conference currently. Well, not.... lol because the crap DA let the league go. Most great clubs have left in the past serval years leaving most areas watered down, with the exception of the West Coast. Look at the ridiculous scores. Hate VDA all you want but they have nothing to do with the crap they called a good conference. So no your above comment still isn't valid.
Don’t associate VDA with great clubs. You haven’t earned it yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Better then the conference that DA was in.![]()
LOL. Thank you for the laugh. Is that why VDA was bottom of the barrel in the DA and then moved to middle of the pack or better in a weak ECNL Mid Atlantic?
Not sure how VDA did for the one year they played, why do you? why do you care? and how do you know the stats of VDA from what 2-3 years ago? Seem's a little obsessed that people keep bringing up VDA when no one is actually talking about them. I do know however, based on seeing the crap teams in the DA in this conference currently. Well, not.... lol because the crap DA let the league go. Most great clubs have left in the past serval years leaving most areas watered down, with the exception of the West Coast. Look at the ridiculous scores. Hate VDA all you want but they have nothing to do with the crap they called a good conference. So no your above comment still isn't valid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Better then the conference that DA was in.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Better then the conference that DA was in.![]()
LOL. Thank you for the laugh. Is that why VDA was bottom of the barrel in the DA and then moved to middle of the pack or better in a weak ECNL Mid Atlantic?
Anonymous wrote:Louisville City.....come on down!!!!!
https://www.eliteclubsnationalleague.com/2020/04/24/nwsl-louisville-academy-joins-ecnl-girls-for-2020-21-season/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Better then the conference that DA was in.![]()
Anonymous wrote:I see Girls ECNL adding 1 club in NE to make a North and South...that would be it for upcoming year
That will give enough time to align new clubs while putting together changes of conferences for less travel
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.
So I guess the ecnl MA never was that elite to begin with.
Anonymous wrote:A club is only considered "elite" if they have the "elite" player pool . Once the "elite" player pool leaves, the club becomes "non-elite"
That's what is going to happen to FCV and Top hat without the ECNL bid. They will lose their pool.