Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like they can open up stores, etc. while the majority of people work from home. I work for a massive company that has one (or more) offices in every state and I would wager that 90% of us can easily work from home, the other 10% can limit their time in the office or easily social distance while there due to the fact that many others can WFH.
Go ahead and open the stores and restaurants but they will still suffer. It's going to be a while before traffic is more than 25% of normal.
This may be a dumb question as I have no experience running a store or restaurant, but wouldn't bringing in some income be better than none? And even if they're not able to re-hire everyone, some people would be employed?
It’s not safe for the workers. Sure it’s better for the owners and landlords but the workers would be better off on unemployment so they can stay home and be safe. Don’t order from restaurants right now.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing is opening up anytime soon. My dh’s federal building just finally closed to everyone this week, and those who were in the office last week are currently quarantined because someone who was there just tested positive.
How on earth are they talking about opening up when things are still shutting down and 2,000 people in the US are dying each day? It’s too soon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing is opening up anytime soon. My dh’s federal building just finally closed to everyone this week, and those who were in the office last week are currently quarantined because someone who was there just tested positive.
How on earth are they talking about opening up when things are still shutting down and 2,000 people in the US are dying each day? It’s too soon.
The daily deaths lag behind by a week or two. Not the number to look at for this decision.
Anonymous wrote:I have a background n data analytics, modeling and actuarial science. so I've been tracking the data (cases, deaths, hospitalizations, testing) daily for the DMV - Maryland (state, county / zip level), DC, and VA (state, county). I don't profess to be an expert in this field at all - but I just like to see the trends myself and not rely on the local reporting
I can see why Hogan is saying signs to be cautiously optimistic - there are some positive trends compared to the early high rates of growth - but we are not in a downward trend overall So the 14 day clock for phase 1 can't start. IMHE predicts peak in a few days for MD- hope they are right; they have tended to be right on peak time; even if off on hospital resources. I'm not sure that Hogan uses that model - but he has the hopkins team. (Note: IMHE updates every few days).
VA data is more messy on reporting, but still no downward trend. Their IMHE predicted peak is still 11+ days off. DC no downward trend. Bowser press conference did not use the IMHE model and has a much later peak than IMHE. those are all projections anyway. The data has to show a consistent downward trend for 14 days - which make rational sense as you can't tell you had a peak until a few days post it and you don't want another wave to resurge.
One of the questions - unknown -if a state in the DMV is ready to open early, will they still do so given other peaks around them. i.e, Will Maryland fully open if DC and VA are still climbing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing is opening up anytime soon. My dh’s federal building just finally closed to everyone this week, and those who were in the office last week are currently quarantined because someone who was there just tested positive.
How on earth are they talking about opening up when things are still shutting down and 2,000 people in the US are dying each day? It’s too soon.
The daily deaths lag behind by a week or two. Not the number to look at for this decision.
Anonymous wrote:I have a background n data analytics, modeling and actuarial science. so I've been tracking the data (cases, deaths, hospitalizations, testing) daily for the DMV - Maryland (state, county / zip level), DC, and VA (state, county). I don't profess to be an expert in this field at all - but I just like to see the trends myself and not rely on the local reporting
I can see why Hogan is saying signs to be cautiously optimistic - there are some positive trends compared to the early high rates of growth - but we are not in a downward trend overall So the 14 day clock for phase 1 can't start. IMHE predicts peak in a few days for MD- hope they are right; they have tended to be right on peak time; even if off on hospital resources. I'm not sure that Hogan uses that model - but he has the hopkins team. (Note: IMHE updates every few days).
VA data is more messy on reporting, but still no downward trend. Their IMHE predicted peak is still 11+ days off. DC no downward trend. Bowser press conference did not use the IMHE model and has a much later peak than IMHE. those are all projections anyway. The data has to show a consistent downward trend for 14 days - which make rational sense as you can't tell you had a peak until a few days post it and you don't want another wave to resurge.
One of the questions - unknown -if a state in the DMV is ready to open early, will they still do so given other peaks around them. i.e, Will Maryland fully open if DC and VA are still climbing?
Anonymous wrote:Nothing is opening up anytime soon. My dh’s federal building just finally closed to everyone this week, and those who were in the office last week are currently quarantined because someone who was there just tested positive.
How on earth are they talking about opening up when things are still shutting down and 2,000 people in the US are dying each day? It’s too soon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They still can’t even form a plan to get people cloth facemasks ... as long as they are still expecting people to tie t-shirts around their faces, I’m not going to have much faith in anything happening.
What do you mean “form a plan to get people cloth face masks”?
Go online and order a face mask if you want one. Who exactly is supposed to knock on your front door with one. They are available hundreds of places online. Order them.
+1 seriously!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like they can open up stores, etc. while the majority of people work from home. I work for a massive company that has one (or more) offices in every state and I would wager that 90% of us can easily work from home, the other 10% can limit their time in the office or easily social distance while there due to the fact that many others can WFH.
Go ahead and open the stores and restaurants but they will still suffer. It's going to be a while before traffic is more than 25% of normal.
THIS. Until consumers feel safe this economy remains in neutral or first gear.
Yes. Who would go to any of those places just because it is opened. Do you remember what happened before the restaurants were issued mandatory closures? There was zero people yet they were still free to move about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like they can open up stores, etc. while the majority of people work from home. I work for a massive company that has one (or more) offices in every state and I would wager that 90% of us can easily work from home, the other 10% can limit their time in the office or easily social distance while there due to the fact that many others can WFH.
Go ahead and open the stores and restaurants but they will still suffer. It's going to be a while before traffic is more than 25% of normal.
THIS. Until consumers feel safe this economy remains in neutral or first gear.