Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I’ve seen some of that, but the kids aren’t annoying on purpose, they’re impulsive and/or anxious...
Oh, that is right. We don’t discipline or show accountability. We make excuses and turn it into something that should be tolerated by the masses.![]()
+1
It is obvious the parents on the defense here have these kids and think it is bad that other people find them problematic and are trying to turn them into victims. ALL the kids are anxious. Mine literally was diagnosed with anxiety and SPD last year. But that sure doesn't give her a free ticket to unmute herself to call out, type inappropriate messages on the chat, and disrupt in other ways as well. There is no excuse for that. And yes, I work FT and I am extremely busy since rates are so low. But I make the time to make sure I am involved with both of my kid's schooling (2nd and 4th) even if it means I work 1-2 hours after they go to bed at night. It is called parenting and many parents don't know how. They want to turn a blind eye and not deal with it.
Glad your kid responds to stress in a way that is acceptable. Not all kids do. So when you say "it's called parenting" you are just showing how ignorant and judgmental you are. Not surprisingly, you have a daughter, not a son.....
So you think if your child is stressed, they should be allowed to disrupt the class over and over again? You just allow it and say it is stress. You don't have any parental control to say you absolutely can not unmute and disrupt. You can not say no typing comments? Really? What the heck? And it shouldn't matter what sex her kids are. That means nothing and is sexist. We aren't talking about 6 hours a day anymore. 1 hour. Your kid needs to follow directions with a teacher for 1 hour and if they can't, it needs to be addressed by you, the parent. Not wait until a teacher has to roll her eyes for the millionth time and then reluctantly send you an email. Because she knows she is going to hear the same BS and excuses you are spewing here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I’ve seen some of that, but the kids aren’t annoying on purpose, they’re impulsive and/or anxious...
Oh, that is right. We don’t discipline or show accountability. We make excuses and turn it into something that should be tolerated by the masses.![]()
+1
It is obvious the parents on the defense here have these kids and think it is bad that other people find them problematic and are trying to turn them into victims. ALL the kids are anxious. Mine literally was diagnosed with anxiety and SPD last year. But that sure doesn't give her a free ticket to unmute herself to call out, type inappropriate messages on the chat, and disrupt in other ways as well. There is no excuse for that. And yes, I work FT and I am extremely busy since rates are so low. But I make the time to make sure I am involved with both of my kid's schooling (2nd and 4th) even if it means I work 1-2 hours after they go to bed at night. It is called parenting and many parents don't know how. They want to turn a blind eye and not deal with it.
Glad your kid responds to stress in a way that is acceptable. Not all kids do. So when you say "it's called parenting" you are just showing how ignorant and judgmental you are. Not surprisingly, you have a daughter, not a son.....
So you think if your child is stressed, they should be allowed to disrupt the class over and over again? You just allow it and say it is stress. You don't have any parental control to say you absolutely can not unmute and disrupt. You can not say no typing comments? Really? What the heck? And it shouldn't matter what sex her kids are. That means nothing and is sexist. We aren't talking about 6 hours a day anymore. 1 hour. Your kid needs to follow directions with a teacher for 1 hour and if they can't, it needs to be addressed by you, the parent. Not wait until a teacher has to roll her eyes for the millionth time and then reluctantly send you an email. Because she knows she is going to hear the same BS and excuses you are spewing here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I’ve seen some of that, but the kids aren’t annoying on purpose, they’re impulsive and/or anxious...
Oh, that is right. We don’t discipline or show accountability. We make excuses and turn it into something that should be tolerated by the masses.![]()
+1
It is obvious the parents on the defense here have these kids and think it is bad that other people find them problematic and are trying to turn them into victims. ALL the kids are anxious. Mine literally was diagnosed with anxiety and SPD last year. But that sure doesn't give her a free ticket to unmute herself to call out, type inappropriate messages on the chat, and disrupt in other ways as well. There is no excuse for that. And yes, I work FT and I am extremely busy since rates are so low. But I make the time to make sure I am involved with both of my kid's schooling (2nd and 4th) even if it means I work 1-2 hours after they go to bed at night. It is called parenting and many parents don't know how. They want to turn a blind eye and not deal with it.
Glad your kid responds to stress in a way that is acceptable. Not all kids do. So when you say "it's called parenting" you are just showing how ignorant and judgmental you are. Not surprisingly, you have a daughter, not a son.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I’ve seen some of that, but the kids aren’t annoying on purpose, they’re impulsive and/or anxious...
Oh, that is right. We don’t discipline or show accountability. We make excuses and turn it into something that should be tolerated by the masses.![]()
+1
It is obvious the parents on the defense here have these kids and think it is bad that other people find them problematic and are trying to turn them into victims. ALL the kids are anxious. Mine literally was diagnosed with anxiety and SPD last year. But that sure doesn't give her a free ticket to unmute herself to call out, type inappropriate messages on the chat, and disrupt in other ways as well. There is no excuse for that. And yes, I work FT and I am extremely busy since rates are so low. But I make the time to make sure I am involved with both of my kid's schooling (2nd and 4th) even if it means I work 1-2 hours after they go to bed at night. It is called parenting and many parents don't know how. They want to turn a blind eye and not deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I’ve seen some of that, but the kids aren’t annoying on purpose, they’re impulsive and/or anxious...
Oh, that is right. We don’t discipline or show accountability. We make excuses and turn it into something that should be tolerated by the masses.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Didn't MCPS just send out a letter that Zoom is down..
Anonymous wrote:OP, you do realize that many of us are also trying to work full-time with our kids in the house, right? And that we can't always request to get off a call based on our kids' Zoom schedule? Come on. Have some empathy here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't imagine Zooming the classroom in the early grades is at all productive, for anyone. A teacher relative of mine is training to stream her kindergarten class online and already says it will be like herding cats. What a waste of time! Grade schools should not be doing live online class at all.
They should have listserves for kids to communicate as a group. So much easier, and easy to control.
Somebody on DCUM has an idée fixe about listservs, because otherwise I can't imagine why someone would suggest a listserv as a way for kindergartners to communicate as a group.
I would not allow my second grader to join a list serve. Completely inappropriate - she doesn’t even have an email address!. This poster needs to realize it’s a terrible idea and move on already.
All MCPS students have email addresses. And it takes about two minutes to get a gmail address for your kid.
Just wait -- you will see MCPS going the email, group email and listerv route soon because after all this time, what they're doing still isn't working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't imagine Zooming the classroom in the early grades is at all productive, for anyone. A teacher relative of mine is training to stream her kindergarten class online and already says it will be like herding cats. What a waste of time! Grade schools should not be doing live online class at all.
They should have listserves for kids to communicate as a group. So much easier, and easy to control.
Somebody on DCUM has an idée fixe about listservs, because otherwise I can't imagine why someone would suggest a listserv as a way for kindergartners to communicate as a group.
I would not allow my second grader to join a list serve. Completely inappropriate - she doesn’t even have an email address!. This poster needs to realize it’s a terrible idea and move on already.