Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn't there widespread coronavirus testing in DC? Why can't anyone get a test? Huge failing by Bowser.
No one cares about this other stuff. Daily press conferences? "Police cars deployed at strategic sites"? Give me a break.
Testing is the only thing that matters.
I agree with you that testing is crucial and that it's a fail. I'm not clear that the failure is Bowser's or Bowser's alone. Please point me towards any large US city or any state that has what you would consider to be an appropriate access to tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the amazing thing. Certain DC agencies like the Board of Zoning Adjustment are still accepting and calendariing development applications for later in April. This may seem ok, but the filings and hearing set-down usually trigger a whole public process in which local ANCs are supposed to meet and hold public meetings and can reach a determination (which the BZA and other DC agencies are supposed to give great weight under the law.). But ANCs are not meeting, public gatherings in the interim are essentially banned, and the result is that the public could be effectively shut out out important regulatory decisions that may affect them. Some DC agencies have put off new business that would trigger a public process, but all should do this right now.
This is a tough one. I see your point, but at the same time it is pretty important to keep as much of the economy going as possible.
Of course, developers need their “special exceptions” to avoid having to comply with zoning requirements in their new projects. These are by definition a contested process where the agencies have to weigh adverse impacts. But if they can push through projects during a crisis via a truncated process from which the public is effectively cut out , what’s for a bought mayors, her crony friends, and the developers’ lobby not to like?
Not every exception is contested. That's what makes it tough. i could see some sort of process where you allow people to register an objection and if there are none the exception goes through.
Hush you NIMBY. You are the reason housing is so expensive. And FYI if you care about global warming, you are pro-density.
The reason housing is so expensive is because way, way, way more people want to live here than can be accommodated.
The reason housing is so cheap in Wyoming? No one wants to live there.
Housing is reasonably cheap in PG, right next to DC. I suppose you’ll retort that no one wants to live there, either?
Is this a serious question? Is PG County known as a highly desirable place to live? The entire reason people are pushing to increase density in DC is because they don't want to live in PG County.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the amazing thing. Certain DC agencies like the Board of Zoning Adjustment are still accepting and calendariing development applications for later in April. This may seem ok, but the filings and hearing set-down usually trigger a whole public process in which local ANCs are supposed to meet and hold public meetings and can reach a determination (which the BZA and other DC agencies are supposed to give great weight under the law.). But ANCs are not meeting, public gatherings in the interim are essentially banned, and the result is that the public could be effectively shut out out important regulatory decisions that may affect them. Some DC agencies have put off new business that would trigger a public process, but all should do this right now.
This is a tough one. I see your point, but at the same time it is pretty important to keep as much of the economy going as possible.
Of course, developers need their “special exceptions” to avoid having to comply with zoning requirements in their new projects. These are by definition a contested process where the agencies have to weigh adverse impacts. But if they can push through projects during a crisis via a truncated process from which the public is effectively cut out , what’s for a bought mayors, her crony friends, and the developers’ lobby not to like?
Not every exception is contested. That's what makes it tough. i could see some sort of process where you allow people to register an objection and if there are none the exception goes through.
Hush you NIMBY. You are the reason housing is so expensive. And FYI if you care about global warming, you are pro-density.
The reason housing is so expensive is because way, way, way more people want to live here than can be accommodated.
The reason housing is so cheap in Wyoming? No one wants to live there.
Housing is reasonably cheap in PG, right next to DC. I suppose you’ll retort that no one wants to live there, either?
Is this a serious question? Is PG County known as a highly desirable place to live? The entire reason people are pushing to increase density in DC is because they don't want to live in PG County.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn't there widespread coronavirus testing in DC? Why can't anyone get a test? Huge failing by Bowser.
No one cares about this other stuff. Daily press conferences? "Police cars deployed at strategic sites"? Give me a break.
Testing is the only thing that matters.
I agree with you that testing is crucial and that it's a fail. I'm not clear that the failure is Bowser's or Bowser's alone. Please point me towards any large US city or any state that has what you would consider to be an appropriate access to tests.
Anonymous wrote:Why isn't there widespread coronavirus testing in DC? Why can't anyone get a test? Huge failing by Bowser.
No one cares about this other stuff. Daily press conferences? "Police cars deployed at strategic sites"? Give me a break.
Testing is the only thing that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the amazing thing. Certain DC agencies like the Board of Zoning Adjustment are still accepting and calendariing development applications for later in April. This may seem ok, but the filings and hearing set-down usually trigger a whole public process in which local ANCs are supposed to meet and hold public meetings and can reach a determination (which the BZA and other DC agencies are supposed to give great weight under the law.). But ANCs are not meeting, public gatherings in the interim are essentially banned, and the result is that the public could be effectively shut out out important regulatory decisions that may affect them. Some DC agencies have put off new business that would trigger a public process, but all should do this right now.
This is a tough one. I see your point, but at the same time it is pretty important to keep as much of the economy going as possible.
Of course, developers need their “special exceptions” to avoid having to comply with zoning requirements in their new projects. These are by definition a contested process where the agencies have to weigh adverse impacts. But if they can push through projects during a crisis via a truncated process from which the public is effectively cut out , what’s for a bought mayors, her crony friends, and the developers’ lobby not to like?
Not every exception is contested. That's what makes it tough. i could see some sort of process where you allow people to register an objection and if there are none the exception goes through.
Hush you NIMBY. You are the reason housing is so expensive. And FYI if you care about global warming, you are pro-density.
The reason housing is so expensive is because way, way, way more people want to live here than can be accommodated.
The reason housing is so cheap in Wyoming? No one wants to live there.
Housing is reasonably cheap in PG, right next to DC. I suppose you’ll retort that no one wants to live there, either?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the amazing thing. Certain DC agencies like the Board of Zoning Adjustment are still accepting and calendariing development applications for later in April. This may seem ok, but the filings and hearing set-down usually trigger a whole public process in which local ANCs are supposed to meet and hold public meetings and can reach a determination (which the BZA and other DC agencies are supposed to give great weight under the law.). But ANCs are not meeting, public gatherings in the interim are essentially banned, and the result is that the public could be effectively shut out out important regulatory decisions that may affect them. Some DC agencies have put off new business that would trigger a public process, but all should do this right now.
This is a tough one. I see your point, but at the same time it is pretty important to keep as much of the economy going as possible.
Of course, developers need their “special exceptions” to avoid having to comply with zoning requirements in their new projects. These are by definition a contested process where the agencies have to weigh adverse impacts. But if they can push through projects during a crisis via a truncated process from which the public is effectively cut out , what’s for a bought mayors, her crony friends, and the developers’ lobby not to like?
Not every exception is contested. That's what makes it tough. i could see some sort of process where you allow people to register an objection and if there are none the exception goes through.
Hush you NIMBY. You are the reason housing is so expensive. And FYI if you care about global warming, you are pro-density.
The reason housing is so expensive is because way, way, way more people want to live here than can be accommodated.
The reason housing is so cheap in Wyoming? No one wants to live there.
Anonymous wrote:Why isn't there widespread coronavirus testing in DC? Why can't anyone get a test? Huge failing by Bowser.
No one cares about this other stuff. Daily press conferences? "Police cars deployed at strategic sites"? Give me a break.
Testing is the only thing that matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the amazing thing. Certain DC agencies like the Board of Zoning Adjustment are still accepting and calendariing development applications for later in April. This may seem ok, but the filings and hearing set-down usually trigger a whole public process in which local ANCs are supposed to meet and hold public meetings and can reach a determination (which the BZA and other DC agencies are supposed to give great weight under the law.). But ANCs are not meeting, public gatherings in the interim are essentially banned, and the result is that the public could be effectively shut out out important regulatory decisions that may affect them. Some DC agencies have put off new business that would trigger a public process, but all should do this right now.
This is a tough one. I see your point, but at the same time it is pretty important to keep as much of the economy going as possible.
Of course, developers need their “special exceptions” to avoid having to comply with zoning requirements in their new projects. These are by definition a contested process where the agencies have to weigh adverse impacts. But if they can push through projects during a crisis via a truncated process from which the public is effectively cut out , what’s for a bought mayors, her crony friends, and the developers’ lobby not to like?
Not every exception is contested. That's what makes it tough. i could see some sort of process where you allow people to register an objection and if there are none the exception goes through.
Hush you NIMBY. You are the reason housing is so expensive. And FYI if you care about global warming, you are pro-density.
The reason housing is so expensive is because way, way, way more people want to live here than can be accommodated.
The reason housing is so cheap in Wyoming? No one wants to live there.