Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You don't know what you're talking about. You have no clue about the protocol for when to use cover, so please stop talking as though you do.
![]()
Ok, how about you enlighten us as to how and when cover is used. Go ahead.
Frankly, lady, you’ve already undercut your own supposed point that you CAN’T provide verification. You can but your agency would “hate/despise” it, but they already allow reporting to your doctor. Basically it’s fine, but you are basking in a culture of oh-my-god-we’re-so-important. As you said, tons of people in this area work in national security. I’d be more impressed by you if you were a nurse or an Amazon delivery person in the present circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You’re a moron. There are CIA Chiefs of Station who are declared and overt. Stop BSing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You don't know what you're talking about. You have no clue about the protocol for when to use cover, so please stop talking as though you do.
![]()
Ok, how about you enlighten us as to how and when cover is used. Go ahead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You don't know what you're talking about. You have no clue about the protocol for when to use cover, so please stop talking as though you do.
DP. In that case, you shouldn’t be posting about this on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You don't know what you're talking about. You have no clue about the protocol for when to use cover, so please stop talking as though you do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You don't know what you're talking about. You have no clue about the protocol for when to use cover, so please stop talking as though you do.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
You don't know what you're talking about. You have no clue about the protocol for when to use cover, so please stop talking as though you do.
Anonymous wrote:DC. Closed until April 1. Does anyone know if daycares that serve families with vouchers (in DC) are opened or closed?
Anonymous wrote:For places reopening next week, do you think that will actually happen given projections for the region? Do you think they are doing it so they can get tuition knowing many people won't show up (and unlikely they could be fully staffed anyway)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.
If you were that important, they’d have a cover agency you would use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Edited to add: I can’t provide employment verification. I work in national security, as do many in this area.
Oh get over yourself. I worked in intelligence and yes, your agency will verify your employment generally. They don’t have to give the details.
My agency would DESPISE it. They already hate the fact that we have to tell doctors where we work if we test positive for this, for tracking purposes.