The Duke lax case was blown off the rails because the DA (Mike Nifong) tried to use the school and the lax team to advance his political career. He was a dirt bag.

Perhaps it may not be PC, but if a woman reports a rape or assault, I would hope every institution has the appropriate protocols in place to launch an investigation that protects the identity and rights of all parties involved.

But, good luck to the kids still hoping to hear from UVA and W&M.

Anonymous wrote:How is the rape hoax an example of political correctness? A woman said she was gang raped and the community leapt I to action. When it was determined it was a lie, they still examined policies and procedures to improve them. Seems rational and appropriate.

Yeah, just like the Duke lacrosse case wasn't a hoax. Kids' lives and reputations were destroyed, but mistakes will be made....

Let me make it simple for you: political correctness is the affliction that caused the administrations of two supposedly great institutions of higher learning to embrace -- immediately, wholeheartedly, and gullibly -- hoaxes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.

Sounds as if Virginia parents have to put up with a lot of nonsense in order to take advantage of in-state tuition!

They are excellent schools. Sorry you were rejected.

How is the rape hoax an example of political correctness? A woman said she was gang raped and the community leapt I to action. When it was determined it was a lie, they still examined policies and procedures to improve them. Seems rational and appropriate.

PP is classless and tasteless. Slurpees are fabulous and I respect my local mini-mart manager who is currently working tirelessly to keep his shelves stocked for his customers. Many of his customers are seniors, single mothers and people with disabilities.

I enjoy talking with him because he is a kind, responsible person. Oh, he's an immigrant too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.

Sounds as if Virginia parents have to put up with a lot of nonsense in order to take advantage of in-state tuition!

Do you have examples of that "nonsense"? Yeah, I thought so. Bet your kid's degree from Podunk U will serve them well when they're managing the local Mini Mart.

Two examples are embedded in the very post you've quoted, you ninny.

I'd refrain from making disparaging comments about others (and their children), when it seems you can't even read.

Now, do the right thing, and apologize.

Apologize? You should apologize - the slurpee machine is STILL broken. (BTW your examples don't demonstrate anything except that you need to do more reading.)

I didn't really expect you to apologize. I just wanted to give you another chance to demonstrate your lack of class.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.

Sounds as if Virginia parents have to put up with a lot of nonsense in order to take advantage of in-state tuition!

Do you have examples of that "nonsense"? Yeah, I thought so. Bet your kid's degree from Podunk U will serve them well when they're managing the local Mini Mart.

Two examples are embedded in the very post you've quoted, you ninny.

I'd refrain from making disparaging comments about others (and their children), when it seems you can't even read.

Now, do the right thing, and apologize.

Apologize? You should apologize - the slurpee machine is STILL broken. (BTW your examples don't demonstrate anything except that you need to do more reading.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.

Sounds as if Virginia parents have to put up with a lot of nonsense in order to take advantage of in-state tuition!

Do you have examples of that "nonsense"? Yeah, I thought so. Bet your kid's degree from Podunk U will serve them well when they're managing the local Mini Mart.

Two examples are embedded in the very post you've quoted, you ninny.

I'd refrain from making disparaging comments about others (and their children), when it seems you can't even read.

Now, do the right thing, and apologize.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.

Sounds as if Virginia parents have to put up with a lot of nonsense in order to take advantage of in-state tuition!

Do you have examples of that "nonsense"? Yeah, I thought so. Bet your kid's degree from Podunk U will serve them well when they're managing the local Mini Mart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.

Sounds as if Virginia parents have to put up with a lot of nonsense in order to take advantage of in-state tuition!

Anonymous wrote:Of the two, which is more politically correct?

I know UVA had that notorious rape hoax a couple of years ago. And W&M ran off a president several years ago after he decided that the crucifix on the altar of the college chapel needed to be covered, so as not to offend non-believers. Sheesh!

It's a tough choice.

They are both solidly liberal places with healthy doses of political correctness. The last vestiges of centrist Dem establishmentarianism are gone.