Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Virus is 10 times more deadly than common flu folks (per CDC). Take it seriously. Don't be the one with dead child weeks down the road.
+1. Watch Dr. Fauci's testimony yesterday
Anonymous wrote:Op, either decision is reasonable. I'm sorry you posted and brought out the crazies on this board. Maybe take it day by day .. well really every few days
Anonymous wrote:Virus is 10 times more deadly than common flu folks (per CDC). Take it seriously. Don't be the one with dead child weeks down the road.
Anonymous wrote:There's no "letting" her stay if she's an adult. I think staying where she is sounds safer for you and her--if the goal is to minimize contact then bringing her into your house just increases risk for both of you.
Encourage her to restrict contact and know that she will probably be fine. Talk to her regularly. If she does get extremely sick you would not necessarily be able to treat her at home either--especially if you got sick yourself. I get the urge to have your whole family under one roof but as kids grow up parents don't always get that. I mean, if your parents are alive they aren't asking you to move back in with them during this, are they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
I work with low income college students and am really frustrated with schools that are completely closing dorms. I'm near Boston, and we are expecting it get bad, but, to me, shelter in place seems like the better strategy.
My rough understanding is that the universities were informed by some government entity (can't remember which, maybe state dept of health) that they needed to lower density ASAP. BU and Northeastern allowed kids to stay on campus, though I wonder if they have a smaller portion of kids dorming compared to H, MIT, BC. I would have much preferred my kid to have stayed in the dorm, though someone must have really freaked out the colleges for them to make this decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
I work with low income college students and am really frustrated with schools that are completely closing dorms. I'm near Boston, and we are expecting it get bad, but, to me, shelter in place seems like the better strategy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.
Oh man. I'd be worried to, and would also rather have my kid stay put than get on a plane.
Anonymous wrote:I would let my kid stay in an apt off campus. I can't think of a reason not to.
Instead, my kid is getting on an airplane tomorrow at Logan, kicked out of the dorms. Not thrilled about the airport, as I'm guessing that airports are among the most germy public places. And coming home to.... siblings with more germs. It's never dull around here.