Anonymous wrote:You're going to be really tired with 2 under 2, but you're also going to be really, really tired with a newborn in your early 40s. So it's six and one half dozen.
Anonymous wrote:If you were 35+ with your first child, when did you have a second child? What age gap worked for you? My husband and I have a 4-month-old. I’m 38 ( turning 39 in a couple of months) and he is 40. Our plan is to start trying for a second child when our first is a year old, but now I’m not sure if we should start trying sooner or wait longer. I know the ideal age gap is 3-4 years, but we can’t wait that long. I’m starting to worry that having a child 2 and under with a newborn will be very tough. I have a friend with a newborn and a 20 month old, and she said it’s very hard. What age do you think is he best time to start trying?
Anonymous wrote:35-#1
39-#2
No issues
Anonymous wrote:I had mine at 36 and 39. I was lucky in that I was able to get pregnant very easily both times. It's been hard, but only in that DH and I both work full time, which would have been an issue 10 years ago, too. Personally, because I've been with my employer for 15 years and am in a senior position, I have more flexibility than I probably would have 10 years ago (less people to impress, my bosses know I'm dedicated).
I will say that I am DEFINITELY more tired than I would have been if I had my kids in my 20s, but I also am able to afford them now! Daycare costs so much and we can easily afford the cost of daycare + school aftercare + extracurriculars + summer camp. 10+ years ago, DH and I were making half of what we make now, I don't know how we would have done it!!