Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latin can teach all the Spanish it wants without altering the reality that white and AA EotP UMC families (who aren't standard bearers for Latino culture) flood Latin with applications every year. Latino families do not.
The arrangement leads to the admission of predominantly UMC and increasingly white student body. The parents of these kids are only too happy to pay for a private bus service from their EotP neighborhoods to the school.
As long as DCPS continues to dig in its heels in opposition to most forms of academic tracking at neighborhood middle schools EotP, and won't take bold steps to improve order and discipline either, nothing will change.
In effect, Latin is being held accountable for public school system failures beyond its control.
As long as Latin continues to allow sibling preference, nothing will change.
Latin could choose to backfill mid-year and for upper grades. The fact thay they continue to choose not to shows that they do not actually want more at-risk kids.
They have lost, at most, a total of 4 students from the HS the last few years and 1 from the MS. Backfilling will not change much, and given who applies, is more likely to result in another white student getting in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latin can teach all the Spanish it wants without altering the reality that white and AA EotP UMC families (who aren't standard bearers for Latino culture) flood Latin with applications every year. Latino families do not.
The arrangement leads to the admission of predominantly UMC and increasingly white student body. The parents of these kids are only too happy to pay for a private bus service from their EotP neighborhoods to the school.
As long as DCPS continues to dig in its heels in opposition to most forms of academic tracking at neighborhood middle schools EotP, and won't take bold steps to improve order and discipline either, nothing will change.
In effect, Latin is being held accountable for public school system failures beyond its control.
As long as Latin continues to allow sibling preference, nothing will change.
Latin could choose to backfill mid-year and for upper grades. The fact thay they continue to choose not to shows that they do not actually want more at-risk kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latin can teach all the Spanish it wants without altering the reality that white and AA EotP UMC families (who aren't standard bearers for Latino culture) flood Latin with applications every year. Latino families do not.
The arrangement leads to the admission of predominantly UMC and increasingly white student body. The parents of these kids are only too happy to pay for a private bus service from their EotP neighborhoods to the school.
As long as DCPS continues to dig in its heels in opposition to most forms of academic tracking at neighborhood middle schools EotP, and won't take bold steps to improve order and discipline either, nothing will change.
In effect, Latin is being held accountable for public school system failures beyond its control.
As long as Latin continues to allow sibling preference, nothing will change.
Anonymous wrote:Latin can teach all the Spanish it wants without altering the reality that white and AA EotP UMC families (who aren't standard bearers for Latino culture) flood Latin with applications every year. Latino families do not.
The arrangement leads to the admission of predominantly UMC and increasingly white student body. The parents of these kids are only too happy to pay for a private bus service from their EotP neighborhoods to the school.
As long as DCPS continues to dig in its heels in opposition to most forms of academic tracking at neighborhood middle schools EotP, and won't take bold steps to improve order and discipline either, nothing will change.
In effect, Latin is being held accountable for public school system failures beyond its control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Diverse by design means intentionally choosing locations that are accessible to all wards of the District of Columbia. The current campus is located within walking distance of major north/south and east/west bus lines and also a metro stop. Latin also runs multiple bus/shuttle lines, over and above regular DCPS transportation options. The school-run bus is free of charge to any student qualifying for free and reduced meals.
Diverse by design requires a lot more than that. Which is probably why Latin has less and less at-risk kids.
Anonymous wrote:Diverse by design means intentionally choosing locations that are accessible to all wards of the District of Columbia. The current campus is located within walking distance of major north/south and east/west bus lines and also a metro stop. Latin also runs multiple bus/shuttle lines, over and above regular DCPS transportation options. The school-run bus is free of charge to any student qualifying for free and reduced meals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This idea that charter schools need to be all things for all students is a misreading of the intent of charters. Charters were intended to allow for the creation of specialty programs and curriculum diversity---a chinese immersion program (Yu Ying), a classics based program (Latin), a experiential learning model (Cap City), a model targeting kids from struggling neighborhoods and socio-economic strata (KIPP). Charters were never intended to be a parallel general education school system for the District of Columbia. Yet, because DCPS refuses to respond to parental desires for differentiated classes and disciplinary policies that facilitate orderly learning environments---over 47% of the parents utilizing public education in DC have chosen to go charter. So it is unrealistic to expect each and every charter school to offer the perfect program for each and every kid---charters were not intended to work that way.
The way statistics are kept in the District regarding the socio-economic status of students does not present an accurate picture of socio-economically diverse schools. There are a significant number of students---both at Latin and elsewhere---that are not "at risk"---defined as on public assistance, in foster care, homeless, or a year behind their chronological peers. Yet those students are also not "affluent" ---they may have parents who are teachers, police officers, government workers. They may not qualify for free and reduced meals but neither are their families capable of paying for private school or purchasing a $1M house zoned for Wilson. It would be much more illuminating if the public school system collected data which would show the distribution of income levels within a school.
Latin is intentionally diverse by design. One of the school's principles is that society is better served when children from all walks of life share an educational experience with each other. I think that is a laudable goal, as America will be ethnically pluralistic within my lifetime.
How is it diverse by design?
Anonymous wrote:This idea that charter schools need to be all things for all students is a misreading of the intent of charters. Charters were intended to allow for the creation of specialty programs and curriculum diversity---a chinese immersion program (Yu Ying), a classics based program (Latin), a experiential learning model (Cap City), a model targeting kids from struggling neighborhoods and socio-economic strata (KIPP). Charters were never intended to be a parallel general education school system for the District of Columbia. Yet, because DCPS refuses to respond to parental desires for differentiated classes and disciplinary policies that facilitate orderly learning environments---over 47% of the parents utilizing public education in DC have chosen to go charter. So it is unrealistic to expect each and every charter school to offer the perfect program for each and every kid---charters were not intended to work that way.
The way statistics are kept in the District regarding the socio-economic status of students does not present an accurate picture of socio-economically diverse schools. There are a significant number of students---both at Latin and elsewhere---that are not "at risk"---defined as on public assistance, in foster care, homeless, or a year behind their chronological peers. Yet those students are also not "affluent" ---they may have parents who are teachers, police officers, government workers. They may not qualify for free and reduced meals but neither are their families capable of paying for private school or purchasing a $1M house zoned for Wilson. It would be much more illuminating if the public school system collected data which would show the distribution of income levels within a school.
Latin is intentionally diverse by design. One of the school's principles is that society is better served when children from all walks of life share an educational experience with each other. I think that is a laudable goal, as America will be ethnically pluralistic within my lifetime.