Anonymous wrote:Yes, pp is absolutely correct! Language changes and maybe some of us are nostalgic for the old ways of saying something but that doesn't mean that the new ways are dumber. They're just different. I don't like change either but I rarely assume that means the change is dumb.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, American English is absolutely getting “dumber” every day. Common usage puts the misused word in the dictionary and then we’re done. We’re losing key distinctions by accepting misuse.
Or languages always evolve. Ask a linguist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keyboarding simply refers to a computer keyboard vs typewriter keys. It's a different skill, although similar. Learning touch typing is the focus of both.
Lots of nouns are now also used as verbs:
Parenting
Googling
Emailing
texting
Ubering
It's actually called "verbing" when it happens.
We called them gerunds. Don't get me started on dangling participles.

Anonymous wrote:I think the change makes more sense. To me, Typing is a verb. It represented hitting the keys on the typewriter. Keyboarding is a noun and is more inclusive of eboverything kesrned today - turning on the computer, using the mouse, opening the program, etc.
Not exactly parallel, but...... When you draw, you create a drawing. When you type on a keyboard, you have learned keyboarding. Tpwhen you workout, you completed training.
Anonymous wrote:Keyboarding simply refers to a computer keyboard vs typewriter keys. It's a different skill, although similar. Learning touch typing is the focus of both.
Lots of nouns are now also used as verbs:
Parenting
Googling
Emailing
texting
Ubering
It's actually called "verbing" when it happens.
Anonymous wrote:How old are you, OP? I took keyboarding in the ninth grade back in '96.
Yes, pp is absolutely correct! Language changes and maybe some of us are nostalgic for the old ways of saying something but that doesn't mean that the new ways are dumber. They're just different. I don't like change either but I rarely assume that means the change is dumb.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, American English is absolutely getting “dumber” every day. Common usage puts the misused word in the dictionary and then we’re done. We’re losing key distinctions by accepting misuse.
Or languages always evolve. Ask a linguist.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, American English is absolutely getting “dumber” every day. Common usage puts the misused word in the dictionary and then we’re done. We’re losing key distinctions by accepting misuse.
At least some of us still know the difference between lose and loose! Thanks PP.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, American English is absolutely getting “dumber” every day. Common usage puts the misused word in the dictionary and then we’re done. We’re losing key distinctions by accepting misuse.
Or languages always evolve. Ask a linguist.
Of course languages evolve to include more words and terms, not they laziness and misuse. Take nauseous/nauseated. We lost nauseated and use nauseous for both something that will make you feel like vomiting and feeling like vomiting. Why? Laziness. And don’t get me started on turning every noun into a verb!
We’re losing language precision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, American English is absolutely getting “dumber” every day. Common usage puts the misused word in the dictionary and then we’re done. We’re losing key distinctions by accepting misuse.
Or languages always evolve. Ask a linguist.
Of course languages evolve to include more words and terms, not they laziness and misuse. Take nauseous/nauseated. We lost nauseated and use nauseous for both something that will make you feel like vomiting and feeling like vomiting. Why? Laziness. And don’t get me started on turning every noun into a verb!
We’re losing language precision.
Maybe worry about your own typing and clunky grammar first.
Well you just admitted that you had no counter-argument and the PP was correct. Way to embarrass yourself! Next time just don’t respond.
No I didn't. I have no interest in arguing with an internet pedant, but I couldn't resist the urge to point out PP's apparent inability to operate a keyboard. Particularly in the context of a thread about the word "keyboarding."
No, Dude. You resorted to “grammar policing” when you had no other defense. Give it up and stop embarrassing yourself more.
I see that you don't understand. PP was claiming that other people are lazy for using certain words, but didn't bother to proofread her own post. She demonstrates the very laziness that she's bitching about. It wasn't intended to be a hard-hitting response to her argument; it was intended to be funny.
But while we're on the subject of language precision, I'm not embarrassing myself, because I don't feel any sense of shame or self-consciousness (at least not as a result of this interaction). The word "embarrass" doesn't mean "doing something that makes others think you're dumb."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This makes perfect sense because the skill is most useful on a keyboard rather than a typewriter. It was typing when people used typewriters, now it’s keyboarding for keyboards. Language changes, it’s not a sign of being dumbed down, but exemplifies how language adapts to be most useful to the people communicating with it.
Do you know that the keyboard of a typewriter is identical to the keyboard on a computer? And where the keys are located on a typewriter has always been called a keyboard.
NP. Where is the Ctrl key on a typewriter? How about Alt or function keys? How do you copy and paste on a typewriter? Undo?
The letter placement is the exact same. All the keys of a typewriter are on a computer keyboard but not all the keys of a keyboard are on a typewriter.
And the PP is correct - way back in the 1950’s touch-typing book my grandmother gave me, the instructions were to “put your hands on the keyboard as illustrated”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, American English is absolutely getting “dumber” every day. Common usage puts the misused word in the dictionary and then we’re done. We’re losing key distinctions by accepting misuse.
Or languages always evolve. Ask a linguist.
Of course languages evolve to include more words and terms, not they laziness and misuse. Take nauseous/nauseated. We lost nauseated and use nauseous for both something that will make you feel like vomiting and feeling like vomiting. Why? Laziness. And don’t get me started on turning every noun into a verb!
We’re losing language precision.
Maybe worry about your own typing and clunky grammar first.
Well you just admitted that you had no counter-argument and the PP was correct. Way to embarrass yourself! Next time just don’t respond.
No I didn't. I have no interest in arguing with an internet pedant, but I couldn't resist the urge to point out PP's apparent inability to operate a keyboard. Particularly in the context of a thread about the word "keyboarding."
No, Dude. You resorted to “grammar policing” when you had no other defense. Give it up and stop embarrassing yourself more.