Anonymous wrote:National percentile really provides zero information for the high end. An almost full score might not be much different from 1-3 wrongs, but should be quite different from 10-15 wrongs, yet we can see the national percentiles are the same at 99%.
Anonymous wrote:A cohort of 20 "highly able" kids seems too small. Some of them would appeal and get in, so the cohort number might reduce to teens. 30 or above seems to be a more reasonable number.
Also, does "highly able" mean 99%? If it is 95%, the pool is very big.
Anonymous wrote:A cohort of 20 "highly able" kids seems too small. Some of them would appeal and get in, so the cohort number might reduce to teens. 30 or above seems to be a more reasonable number.
Also, does "highly able" mean 99%? If it is 95%, the pool is very big.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As per one of the forums here, 7300 kids out of 12000 kids in county have attended the Magnet Cogat test. does it mean that 73 kids have 99 percentile?
Will all these 73 kids will get into the magnet program?
I think those numbers are wrong. I think there are 7300 5th graders and guessing about 4000 were tested. The 4000 number comes from last year.
Meaning about 1333 kids in each SES grouping and the percentiles are assigned by grouping. 13 99th percentile in each group or 39 in the county. But that assumes more of an even distribution. I think based on numbers I've seen before for high school that it's not an even distribution.
If there are lots of kids with the same score like if a whole bunch (10 percent of the total) got a perfect verbal score a perfect verbal score might only be 90th percentile. All of those kids would have gotten 90th percentile.
Except that would be local percentile, which still hasn’t come out yet. They would all be 99th percentile nationally, which is what we have now.
Agreed. Local percentiles are yet to be seen -- and I think those are the most interesting - while, nationally, 99% is not that hard of a bar to clear.
I just feel lucky that DD crosses that bar. The FARM rate is above 40% for DD's school, so that would help, I guess.
I just want to prepare you for all outcomes. The first year they did the cohort thing (but they didn’t do the MCPS percentiles), my 99 percentile kid who barely missed any questions on Q and V and a few on NV, going to a school with 50 percent FARMS, was rejected from both magnets. Not even waitlisted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As per one of the forums here, 7300 kids out of 12000 kids in county have attended the Magnet Cogat test. does it mean that 73 kids have 99 percentile?
Will all these 73 kids will get into the magnet program?
I think those numbers are wrong. I think there are 7300 5th graders and guessing about 4000 were tested. The 4000 number comes from last year.
Meaning about 1333 kids in each SES grouping and the percentiles are assigned by grouping. 13 99th percentile in each group or 39 in the county. But that assumes more of an even distribution. I think based on numbers I've seen before for high school that it's not an even distribution.
If there are lots of kids with the same score like if a whole bunch (10 percent of the total) got a perfect verbal score a perfect verbal score might only be 90th percentile. All of those kids would have gotten 90th percentile.
Except that would be local percentile, which still hasn’t come out yet. They would all be 99th percentile nationally, which is what we have now.
Agreed. Local percentiles are yet to be seen -- and I think those are the most interesting - while, nationally, 99% is not that hard of a bar to clear.
I just feel lucky that DD crosses that bar. The FARM rate is above 40% for DD's school, so that would help, I guess.
I just want to prepare you for all outcomes. The first year they did the cohort thing (but they didn’t do the MCPS percentiles), my 99 percentile kid who barely missed any questions on Q and V and a few on NV, going to a school with 50 percent FARMS, was rejected from both magnets. Not even waitlisted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As per one of the forums here, 7300 kids out of 12000 kids in county have attended the Magnet Cogat test. does it mean that 73 kids have 99 percentile?
Will all these 73 kids will get into the magnet program?
I think those numbers are wrong. I think there are 7300 5th graders and guessing about 4000 were tested. The 4000 number comes from last year.
Meaning about 1333 kids in each SES grouping and the percentiles are assigned by grouping. 13 99th percentile in each group or 39 in the county. But that assumes more of an even distribution. I think based on numbers I've seen before for high school that it's not an even distribution.
If there are lots of kids with the same score like if a whole bunch (10 percent of the total) got a perfect verbal score a perfect verbal score might only be 90th percentile. All of those kids would have gotten 90th percentile.
Except that would be local percentile, which still hasn’t come out yet. They would all be 99th percentile nationally, which is what we have now.
Agreed. Local percentiles are yet to be seen -- and I think those are the most interesting - while, nationally, 99% is not that hard of a bar to clear.
I just feel lucky that DD crosses that bar. The FARM rate is above 40% for DD's school, so that would help, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious about the "student profile" on the score report- is it depending on each question the student did right or wrong? sound like the CogAT is pretty powerful test.
Anonymous wrote:
It's boilerplate and depends on the difference between areas. Was verbal much higher than quant? And the number they got right. I think it's useful but I wouldn't have too much faith in it. Group tests can be misleading for some kids. Use it as part of the whole picture of grades and other performance factors. DD is a good example. She had one score lower than others but when she has taken other tests (due to an LD) that has same area has consistently been an area of strength. This includes the 3rd grade Cogat screener, Inview, WPPSI and Woodcock Johnson achievement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, this post sounds very professional. I hope MCPS could post something like this for parents- whoever want to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, no intention for competition at all, just want to have an idea where DD is in the whole map.
Now seems 9B is better than 9A.
9B is not better or worse than 9A.
A means that the child’s scores are consistent across all three tests.
B means that two of the scores are consistent and there is a relative outlier, either lower or higher than the other two.
C means that the three scores are spread out with a clear low, middle, and high score.
E is an extreme example of either B (outlier) or C (spread).
Read the pdf with your results. There is a link for more info about the profiles and it’s all there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid did very well. It’s not a competition.
Except it is. Competitive magnet admissions depend on these scores.
I'd say, out of all the scores above, 20:35 has the best shot. My own child got 54, 50, 45 and I'm positive she won't get into any magnets but will, most likely, be picked for enriched MS courses. We'll see in about a week.![]()