Anonymous wrote:OP I'm sorry you experienced this, you might enjoy the book "Small Animals" It's about the shifts in recent years of people's perception of "safety" when kids aren't next to our sides 24/7 (OP you're doing the right thing! This is good for your kids). It's about a mom who experienced something similar to you, though hers went much farther. It's very interesting and will invalidate some of the fear mongering going on in this thread. The person who said "they could trip and fall in the low light and that's a risk you don't want to take" particularly captures the author's concerns in how things have shifted.. very interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty surprised by all of those vilifying this neighbor and assuming he's some kind of nefarious crackpot who needs to be reported to the police. (Also may be some sexism going on here - if it were a woman who did this would your reaction have been the same?)
Being a neighbor who shows concern for kids' safety is now something to be reported to the police? So maybe he wasn't nice about it but he did bring his concerns to your attention.
Guess when anyone sees something amiss we should just keep their mouths shut, walk on by and "mind our own business" lest someone accuse you of being a busy body or much worse.
Yep. That sounds like it will work for the benefit of kids.
He basically threatened her. That's a bit more than "concern".
"If you don't do something about your unmown lawn I'm going to call the county."
"If you keep leaving your dog outside for days at a time, I am calling the county."
"If you keep blasting your music outside, I am going to call the county."
Threats? If you want to call it that. I consider it fair warning. For all we know, despite her protestations otherwise, OP may frequently leave her kids alone outside after dark and neighbor has seen enough of it to speak out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty surprised by all of those vilifying this neighbor and assuming he's some kind of nefarious crackpot who needs to be reported to the police. (Also may be some sexism going on here - if it were a woman who did this would your reaction have been the same?)
Being a neighbor who shows concern for kids' safety is now something to be reported to the police? So maybe he wasn't nice about it but he did bring his concerns to your attention.
Guess when anyone sees something amiss we should just keep their mouths shut, walk on by and "mind our own business" lest someone accuse you of being a busy body or much worse.
Yep. That sounds like it will work for the benefit of kids.
He basically threatened her. That's a bit more than "concern".
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty surprised by all of those vilifying this neighbor and assuming he's some kind of nefarious crackpot who needs to be reported to the police. (Also may be some sexism going on here - if it were a woman who did this would your reaction have been the same?)
Being a neighbor who shows concern for kids' safety is now something to be reported to the police? So maybe he wasn't nice about it but he did bring his concerns to your attention.
Guess when anyone sees something amiss we should just keep their mouths shut, walk on by and "mind our own business" lest someone accuse you of being a busy body or much worse.
Yep. That sounds like it will work for the benefit of kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it's a rule in moco. Children under 8 must have someone 13 or older with them.
No, it’s a MARYLAND law.
http://dhs.maryland.gov/documents/Child%20Protective%20Services/Brochures/Unattended-Childre-Brochure-2016.pdf
These children were not unattended. That law is not applicable.
Mom was inside and did not come out, while this man made numerous passes back and forth. The 10 year old isn’t old enough to qualify as a babysitter yet. He could make a case; unlikely to win, but OP wanted to know if there could be trouble.
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty surprised by all of those vilifying this neighbor and assuming he's some kind of nefarious crackpot who needs to be reported to the police. (Also may be some sexism going on here - if it were a woman who did this would your reaction have been the same?)
Being a neighbor who shows concern for kids' safety is now something to be reported to the police? So maybe he wasn't nice about it but he did bring his concerns to your attention.
Guess when anyone sees something amiss we should just keep their mouths shut, walk on by and "mind our own business" lest someone accuse you of being a busy body or much worse.
Yep. That sounds like it will work for the benefit of kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you are in the wrong regardless of the law. It’s dark out, your kids should not be out on the street by themselves. It blows my mind that you saw a man you don’t know walk by several times and you didn’t think to go out.
I was outside after dark all the time growing up. These kids were right in front of their own home. People walk by with dogs all the time in most neighborhoods.
Quit the hysteria. OP did nothing wrong.
Anonymous wrote:I think you are in the wrong regardless of the law. It’s dark out, your kids should not be out on the street by themselves. It blows my mind that you saw a man you don’t know walk by several times and you didn’t think to go out.
Anonymous wrote:OP I'm sorry you experienced this, you might enjoy the book "Small Animals" It's about the shifts in recent years of people's perception of "safety" when kids aren't next to our sides 24/7 (OP you're doing the right thing! This is good for your kids). It's about a mom who experienced something similar to you, though hers went much farther. It's very interesting and will invalidate some of the fear mongering going on in this thread. The person who said "they could trip and fall in the low light and that's a risk you don't want to take" particularly captures the author's concerns in how things have shifted.. very interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it's a rule in moco. Children under 8 must have someone 13 or older with them.
No, it’s a MARYLAND law.
http://dhs.maryland.gov/documents/Child%20Protective%20Services/Brochures/Unattended-Childre-Brochure-2016.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it's a rule in moco. Children under 8 must have someone 13 or older with them.
No, it’s a MARYLAND law.
http://dhs.maryland.gov/documents/Child%20Protective%20Services/Brochures/Unattended-Childre-Brochure-2016.pdf
These children were not unattended. That law is not applicable.