Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html
Yes, it clearly was.
I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.
The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.
Shades of Diana (who I really liked but...) encouraging the press to do something and then playing the innocent victim.
Huh? Are you saying Harry and Meghan asked Daily Mail to photoshop the card they released and then fabricate a story about then photoshopping their own card in order to look like victims when people finally figured out that the Daily Mail version was different from the official version?
Anonymous wrote:Some of you are extremely hateful individuals. Period. Whatever you have to say to justify your nastiness, go right ahead. But deep down, you are truly terrible people. Meghan Markle will NEVER be able to do anything to please most of the previous posters on this thread. You can blame whatever sham reason you have but the truth is very obvious. What is her heinous crime this time? What has she done to deserve the vitriol being thrown her family’s way? Shameful.
That baby is cute. He’s not the best looking child to ever be born but he’s perfectly fine. The picture they released wasn’t photoshopped, Daily Mail altered it in order to make it seem as if Meghan was focused and Harry was blurry. In reality both adults are a little blurry so that the baby can be the primary focus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html
Yes, it clearly was.
I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.
The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.
Shades of Diana (who I really liked but...) encouraging the press to do something and then playing the innocent victim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html
Yes, it clearly was.
I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.
The Daily Mail version was altered from the original issued by Meghan and Harry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html
Yes, it clearly was.
I’m not a big fan of jumping in her for some things, but in this case her face was clearly photoshopped. Look at the fuzziness of her sweater compared to her face. It is clearly two different pictures. It is unfortunate because they get so much unnecessary heat, but this is just so vain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html
Yes, it clearly was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Archie is a cutie - wtf saying he's "breathtaking"?
If you don’t get the reference, you don’t get the reference.
Anonymous wrote:Archie is a cutie - wtf saying he's "breathtaking"?
Anonymous wrote:I’m a big fan of them but I don’t like this picture. The giant baby face is weird to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of questions on whether Meghan’s face is photoshopped. What do you think?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7824523/Was-Meghan-Markles-face-PHOTOSHOPPED-Christmas-e-card.html
Daily Mail altered Meghan’s face on the card to make it look photoshopped. Here’s the real one, where her face is just as blurry as Harry’s:
https://mobile.twitter.com/queenscomtrust/status/1209241848411303941
Wow. That's downright evil.
Well, it is a racist rag that hates Meghan for being black and hates Harry for marrying someone black.
But like...they aren’t concerned with being sued again?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That is not a flattering picture of their child. Not a fan.
This. If you’re a Seinfeld fan, you’ll agree that this baby is...breathtaking.