Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I love your post. Redistricting SAT scores- I'd laugh out loud except I want to cry because it's what they are doing but it impacts me.
It only impacts you if your house is so crappy that the only way you can justify the asking price is by convincing someone stupid that their child can get into HYPS if they are zoned for your HS.
Anonymous wrote:OP I love your post. Redistricting SAT scores- I'd laugh out loud except I want to cry because it's what they are doing but it impacts me.
Anonymous wrote:OP I love your post. Redistricting SAT scores- I'd laugh out loud except I want to cry because it's what they are doing but it impacts me.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give it a rest, OP.
When your kid applies to college, they use their own, individual SAT score. They don't apply to college with their high school's average SAT score.
Ok really slowly so you can understand
Would you rather have your kid grow up and be around kids who score 900 on SATs or 1400 on SATs get it
It's about the environment, you want an environment with a higher performing cohort
Ok so which one is your kids in? That's the one I want my kids to stay away from. Your willful ignorance may rub off
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give it a rest, OP.
When your kid applies to college, they use their own, individual SAT score. They don't apply to college with their high school's average SAT score.
Ok really slowly so you can understand
Would you rather have your kid grow up and be around kids who score 900 on SATs or 1400 on SATs get it
It's about the environment, you want an environment with a higher performing cohort
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You misinterpret the data about SAT scores. SAT scores are not reflective of quality of school teaching, nor are they linked to community or school average income level (as reflected by FARMS rate).
SAT scores *are* highly correlated to the family income of the student. The wealthier your family, the more likely you are to do well on the SAT. This is because wealthy families generally access private tutoring for SAT/ACT and class support. Particularly in HS, many students are getting tutors to make up for poor classroom teaching. Wealthy families also access more enrichment activities, etc., for their kids.
They're much more highly correlated to the educational attainment of the parents. When this is added into the mix, SES influence drops almost to zero. I'd bet if you were able to add parental IQ, educational attainment would in turn become much less relevant.
OP I agree that there is at least a grain in truth in this. Then why are we trying to move kids around again if the actual impact is almost entirely related to the parents and not the school again.
1. because it's not just about SAT scores
2. because schools are overcrowded and boundaries need to be redrawn
3. because schools with high FARMS rate have issues that are difficult to address with limited resources
4. because kids of all backgrounds benefit from being exposed to diversity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reason AA are not as educated as white people is that they were kicked down every single time they tried to get up. Still are, by liberal dcum apparently. As are Hispanic people.
Very true. Just look at how amazingly people of African descent are doing outside the US. The difference is astounding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The reason AA are not as educated as white people is that they were kicked down every single time they tried to get up. Still are, by liberal dcum apparently. As are Hispanic people.
but mostly by white-nationalists AKA the GOP
Anonymous wrote:The reason AA are not as educated as white people is that they were kicked down every single time they tried to get up. Still are, by liberal dcum apparently. As are Hispanic people.
Anonymous wrote:The reason AA are not as educated as white people is that they were kicked down every single time they tried to get up. Still are, by liberal dcum apparently. As are Hispanic people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redlining kept black people out of white neighborhoods for decades. White schools were better. White people continued to buy in white neighborhoods and since white people had the money, prices went up there the most. Most white people dont want to live in a formerly redlined mostly black neighborhood. Since the white schools got more resources, white kids did better. They had the wealth and could afford the outside help for their kids. Now today there is a history of better performance in traditionally white neighborhoods that keeps the middle class and wealthy moving there.
First, the resources in all MCPS schools are allocated using the same formula, with extra funding for schools with more FARM students. The ‘good’ schools have less resources than the not so good schools.
Second, it is human nature that parents want to find a neighborhood that is safe. Please notice where UMC and MC AA families live. They don't live in NE or SE DC. Most of UMC AA families in DC live in NW.. Will you accuse them racists sts?