Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Martin O’Malley. He had a fundraiser at The Dubliner on Wednesday night but it was ruined when a Republican showed up.
If O’Malley runs I will certainly vote in a Republican. Rain tax??!?!?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Martin O’Malley. He had a fundraiser at The Dubliner on Wednesday night but it was ruined when a Republican showed up.
If O’Malley runs I will certainly vote in a Republican. Rain tax??!?!?
Anonymous wrote:Martin O’Malley. He had a fundraiser at The Dubliner on Wednesday night but it was ruined when a Republican showed up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, Peter Franchot just declared that he will run for Governor, but he has not actually filed yet.
I predict that it will be Boyd Rutherford vs Peter Franchot for the next election and that Peter Franchot will probably win, but narrowly. Lt Governors have not done well in MD for some time. In part, it is due to the fact that most Lt Governors do virtually nothing and then have one or two detractions against them (like Anthony Brown's debacle of rolling out the MD marketplace for ACA health care). Boyd Rutherford does get the benefit of having no failures in his term, but he also doesn't seem to have any successes either. There has been very little news about what he's done as Lt Governor for 7 years now and that doesn't look good. Peter Franchot has had a lot more news about him and his successes in the news and that will probably lead to him having an advantage in the general election.
I agree with this. Franchot has a big machine behind him, and Rutherford will use Hogan's machine. If the election is a referendum on Hogan's performance, Rutherford has a decent chance. I'd vote Rutherford in that scenario, but would be fine with Franchot winning.
Having Hogan in place to counter-balance Elrich in MoCo has been crucial when it comes to reopening schools and overriding other leadership failures on the side of Elrich.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, Peter Franchot just declared that he will run for Governor, but he has not actually filed yet.
I predict that it will be Boyd Rutherford vs Peter Franchot for the next election and that Peter Franchot will probably win, but narrowly. Lt Governors have not done well in MD for some time. In part, it is due to the fact that most Lt Governors do virtually nothing and then have one or two detractions against them (like Anthony Brown's debacle of rolling out the MD marketplace for ACA health care). Boyd Rutherford does get the benefit of having no failures in his term, but he also doesn't seem to have any successes either. There has been very little news about what he's done as Lt Governor for 7 years now and that doesn't look good. Peter Franchot has had a lot more news about him and his successes in the news and that will probably lead to him having an advantage in the general election.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, Peter Franchot just declared that he will run for Governor, but he has not actually filed yet.
I predict that it will be Boyd Rutherford vs Peter Franchot for the next election and that Peter Franchot will probably win, but narrowly. Lt Governors have not done well in MD for some time. In part, it is due to the fact that most Lt Governors do virtually nothing and then have one or two detractions against them (like Anthony Brown's debacle of rolling out the MD marketplace for ACA health care). Boyd Rutherford does get the benefit of having no failures in his term, but he also doesn't seem to have any successes either. There has been very little news about what he's done as Lt Governor for 7 years now and that doesn't look good. Peter Franchot has had a lot more news about him and his successes in the news and that will probably lead to him having an advantage in the general election.
The Democrats in general don't like Peter Franchot. In fact, a lot actively dislike him.
There will be a primary and someone super progressive will run against him and lose. Then Franchot will win.
Anonymous wrote:No way it will be Calvin Ball. Howard County had a moderate (Republican) County Executive, but voted Democratic and are now outraged with what they got.
He is so unpopular in HoCo because of development and redistricting, I can't see him as a viable Gubernatorial candidate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calling it now, Calvin Ball will be our next Governor.
He's a fairly inexperienced county executive with no real name or reputation. And with a problematic and highly unpopular school redistricting happening under his watch. It could backfire spectacularly. I'm not sure what advantages he could bring over more established Democratic potentials.
Anonymous wrote:I moved to Maryland about 16 years ago and don't understand how a state dominated by Democrats for so long manages to have such a short bench of qualified candidates for governor. Ehrlich and Hogan aren't amazing politicians but even I (die hard liberal) had a hard time pulling the lever for Katherine Kennedy Townsend ("I have Kennedy in my name") or Anthony Brown or Ben Jealous.
Seems like I should be prepared for another candidate from the Democratic establishment who has spent their life in government and has all the inspiration of a dish towel. My wife will join a million other Democrats who vote for the Republican businessman who will be our next governor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, Peter Franchot just declared that he will run for Governor, but he has not actually filed yet.
I predict that it will be Boyd Rutherford vs Peter Franchot for the next election and that Peter Franchot will probably win, but narrowly. Lt Governors have not done well in MD for some time. In part, it is due to the fact that most Lt Governors do virtually nothing and then have one or two detractions against them (like Anthony Brown's debacle of rolling out the MD marketplace for ACA health care). Boyd Rutherford does get the benefit of having no failures in his term, but he also doesn't seem to have any successes either. There has been very little news about what he's done as Lt Governor for 7 years now and that doesn't look good. Peter Franchot has had a lot more news about him and his successes in the news and that will probably lead to him having an advantage in the general election.
The Democrats in general don't like Peter Franchot. In fact, a lot actively dislike him.
There will be a primary and someone super progressive will run against him and lose. Then Franchot will win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, Peter Franchot just declared that he will run for Governor, but he has not actually filed yet.
I predict that it will be Boyd Rutherford vs Peter Franchot for the next election and that Peter Franchot will probably win, but narrowly. Lt Governors have not done well in MD for some time. In part, it is due to the fact that most Lt Governors do virtually nothing and then have one or two detractions against them (like Anthony Brown's debacle of rolling out the MD marketplace for ACA health care). Boyd Rutherford does get the benefit of having no failures in his term, but he also doesn't seem to have any successes either. There has been very little news about what he's done as Lt Governor for 7 years now and that doesn't look good. Peter Franchot has had a lot more news about him and his successes in the news and that will probably lead to him having an advantage in the general election.
The Democrats in general don't like Peter Franchot. In fact, a lot actively dislike him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, Peter Franchot just declared that he will run for Governor, but he has not actually filed yet.
I predict that it will be Boyd Rutherford vs Peter Franchot for the next election and that Peter Franchot will probably win, but narrowly. Lt Governors have not done well in MD for some time. In part, it is due to the fact that most Lt Governors do virtually nothing and then have one or two detractions against them (like Anthony Brown's debacle of rolling out the MD marketplace for ACA health care). Boyd Rutherford does get the benefit of having no failures in his term, but he also doesn't seem to have any successes either. There has been very little news about what he's done as Lt Governor for 7 years now and that doesn't look good. Peter Franchot has had a lot more news about him and his successes in the news and that will probably lead to him having an advantage in the general election.
The Democrats in general don't like Peter Franchot. In fact, a lot actively dislike him.
That's a good sign. Maybe I'll vote for him. I like that he worked with Hogan on the 270/495 improvement project.